Literature DB >> 35813542

Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Hybrid Surgery and Fusion Application with Peek Cage in Patients Undergoing Three-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy.

Güray Bulut1, Aziz Çataltepe2, Mevlüt Özgür Taşkapılıoğlu3.   

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare patients with degenerative cervical disc herniation (CDH) who had undergone three-level anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) and fusion with a peek cage supported by synthetic bone graft in all levels to the cases with CDH with hybrid surgery (HS) regarding their radiological findings and surgical results. Materials and
Methods: The patients who had undergone three-level ACD were evaluated retrospectively. The cases who were followed up for 2 years and longer were evaluated regarding gender, age, radiological findings, and patient satisfaction. A radiological assessment was made by calculating the Cobb angle on lateral cervical radiographs. Clinical assessment was performed by the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
Results: In the first group, 13 patients had undergone ACD and fusion with peek cage and bone graft, and in the hybrid group, there were 11 patients in whom fusion with peek cage and bone graft were made in two levels, and cervical disc arthroplasty was performed throughout the distance in-between. In the hybrid group, the 1-month and 24-month changes in cervical range of motion in hyperflexion were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In both groups, significant improvements of NDI were determined postoperatively (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared, the 1-month and 24-month improvements were statistically significantly increased in the hybrid surgery group compared to the group that underwent fusion surgery with a cage (p < 0.05). Conclusions: HS is a reliable and effective treatment method in the three-level cervical disk disease for preserving and improving cervical ROM, particularly in the flexion position. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical anterior fusion; Cervical arthrodesis; Cervical disk herniation; Cervical disk prosthesis; Cervical diskectomy; Cervical hybrid surgery; Degenerative cervical disc herniation; Hybrid surgery; Multiple level disk herniation; Peek cage

Year:  2022        PMID: 35813542      PMCID: PMC9232667          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00630-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  23 in total

1.  Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; S Craig Humphreys; Tae-Hong Lim; Soon Tack Jeong; Jesse G Kim; Scott D Hodges; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Lin Nie; Li Zhang; Yong Hou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Artificial disk replacement combined with midlevel ACDF versus multilevel fusion for cervical disk disease involving 3 levels.

Authors:  Liangqi Kang; Dasheng Lin; Zhenqi Ding; Bowei Liang; Kejian Lian
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; Pierce Dalton Nunley; Kee D Kim; Michael S Hisey; Robert J Jackson; Hyun W Bae; Gregory A Hoffman; Steven E Gaede; Guy O Danielson; Charles Gordon; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-01

5.  Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Mario J Cardoso; Michael K Rosner
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study.

Authors:  Emine Aslan Telci; Ayse Karaduman; Yavuz Yakut; Bahar Aras; Ibrahim E Simsek; Naciye Yagli
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.

Authors:  Dong Ah Shin; Seong Yi; Do Heum Yoon; Keung Nyun Kim; Hyun Cheol Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation.

Authors:  Shiuh-Lin Hwang; Chih-Lung Lin; Ann-Shung Lieu; Kung-Shing Lee; Tai-Hung Kuo; Yan-Fen Hwang; Yu-Feng Su; Shen-Long Howng
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-09

9.  Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages.

Authors:  Ahmed Elsawaf; Luciano Mastronardi; Raffaelino Roperto; Alessandro Bozzao; Manuela Caroli; Luigi Ferrante
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ting-Kui Wu; Bei-Yu Wang; Ming-Dan Deng; Ying Hong; Xin Rong; Hua Chen; Yang Meng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.