| Literature DB >> 35807945 |
Buthaina E Alathari1,2, David A Nyakotey3,4, Abdul-Malik Bawah3, Julie A Lovegrove1,5, Reginald A Annan3, Basma Ellahi6, Karani S Vimaleswaran1,5,7.
Abstract
The Ghanaian population is experiencing an upsurge in obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to rapid urbanization. Besides dietary factors, vitamin D-related genetic determinants have also been shown to contribute to the development of obesity and T2D. Hence, we aimed to examine the interactions between dietary factors and vitamin D-related genetic variants on obesity and T2D related outcomes in a Ghanaian population. Three hundred and two healthy Ghanaian adults (25-60 years old) from Oforikrom, Municipality in Kumasi, Ghana were randomly recruited and had genetic tests, dietary consumption analysis, and anthropometric and biochemical measurements of glucose, HbA1c, insulin, cholesterol, and triglycerides taken. A significant interaction was identified between vitamin D-GRS and fiber intake (g/day) on BMI (pinteraction = 0.020) where those who were consuming low fiber (≤16.19 g/d) and carrying more than two risk alleles for vitamin D deficiency (p = 0.01) had a significantly higher BMI. In addition, an interaction between vitamin D-GRS and fat intake (g/day) on HbA1c (total fat, pinteraction = 0.029) was found, where participants who had a lower total fat intake (≤36.5 g/d), despite carrying more than two risk alleles, had significantly lower HbA1c (p = 0.049). In summary, our study has identified novel gene-diet interactions of vitamin D-GRS with dietary fiber and fat intakes on metabolic traits in Ghanaian adults.Entities:
Keywords: Ghana; fat; fiber; genetic risk score; gene–diet interaction; metabolic traits
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807945 PMCID: PMC9269445 DOI: 10.3390/nu14132763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow chart showing the recruitment of the study participants.
Baseline characteristics of study participants.
|
| Total |
| Men |
| Women | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 279 | 38 ± 10 | 115 | 36 ± 9 | 164 | 40 ± 10 | 0.003 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 279 | 26.6 ± 4.91 | 115 | 23.6 ± 3.02 | 164 | 28.7 ± 4.92 | <0.001 |
| WC (cm) | 279 | 88.4 ± 12.22 | 115 | 81.8 ± 9.92 | 164 | 93 ± 11.59 | <0.001 |
| WHR | 279 | 1.5 ± 7.24 | 115 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 164 | 1.9 ± 9.43 | 0.15 |
| BFP (%) | 279 | 32.9 ± 13.55 | 115 | 20.5 ± 10.01 | 164 | 41.6 ± 7.58 | <0.001 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 278 | 4.4 ± 0.91 | 115 | 4.3 ± 0.59 | 163 | 4.4 ± 1.09 | 0.33 |
| HbA1c (%) | 275 | 5.3 ± 0.58 | 111 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 164 | 5.3 ± 0.62 | 0.94 |
| Fasting Insulin (µIU/mL) | 270 | 12.6 ± 14.38 | 109 | 13.1 ± 16.08 | 161 | 12.3 ± 13.15 | 0.62 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 276 | 212.7 ± 58 | 113 | 208.8 ± 41.76 | 163 | 216.6 ± 39.06 | 0.07 |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 276 | 69.6 ± 7.70 | 113 | 69.6 ± 7.35 | 163 | 65.7 ± 0.7.73 | 0.12 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 276 | 127.6 ± 41.76 | 113 | 123.7 ± 42.54 | 163 | 131.5 ± 40.99 | 0.06 |
| Serum Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 276 | 87.3 ± 32.78 | 113 | 86.8 ± 29.23 | 163 | 87.7 ± 36.32 | 0.98 |
| Total Energy Intake (kcal) | 279 | 1645 ± 688 | 115 | 1901 ± 714 | 164 | 1465 ± 610 | <0.001 |
| Protein (g) | 279 | 53 ± 23 | 115 | 63 ± 24 | 164 | 46 ± 19 | <0.001 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 279 | 240 ± 98 | 115 | 281 ± 104 | 164 | 211 ± 81 | <0.001 |
| Fat (g) | 279 | 51 ± 27 | 115 | 57 ± 29 | 164 | 47 ± 24 | 0.001 |
| Saturated fat (g) | 279 | 16 ± 10 | 115 | 18 ± 11 | 164 | 15 ± 9 | 0.006 |
| Monounsaturated fat (g) | 279 | 18 ± 10 | 115 | 20 ± 11 | 164 | 16 ± 9 | 0.002 |
| Polyunsaturated fat (g) | 279 | 9 ± 5 | 115 | 10 ± 6 | 164 | 8 ± 5 | 0.002 |
| Dietary Fibre (g) | 279 | 22 ± 11 | 115 | 25 ± 12 | 164 | 19 ± 10 | <0.001 |
Data are presented as means ± SD, p values for the differences in the means between the two groups were calculated by using the independent samples t-test, Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index, WC: waist circumference, WHR: waist–hip ratio; BFP: body fat percentage; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HDL-c: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 2(A) Interaction between vitamin D-GRS and total dietary fiber intake (g) on log BMI (pinteraction = 0.020); Participants who consumed lower fiber (≤16.19 g/d) and carried ≥2 risk alleles (mean ± SE: 1.45 ± 0.009) had significantly higher BMI than participants with <2 vitamin D risk alleles (mean ± SE: 1.40 ± 0.015). (B) Interaction between vitamin D-GRS and total fat intake (g) on log HbA1c (pinteraction = 0.020); Participants who consumed lower fat intake (≤36.47 g/d) and carried ≥2 risk alleles (mean ± SE: 0.72 ± 0.005) had significantly lower HbA1c than participants with <2 risk alleles (mean ± SE: 0.74 ± 0.010).
Interaction between dietary factors and vitamin D-GRS on clinical and metabolic traits.
| Carbohydrates (g) | Protein (g) | Fat (g) | Fibre (g) | SFA (g) | PUFA (g) | MUFA (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.99 | 0.02 | |||
| WC (cm) | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.13 | |||
| WHR | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.87 | |||
| BFP (%) | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.12 | |||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.52 | |||
| HbA1c (ng/mL) | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Fasting Insulin (µIU/mL) | 0.35 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.13 |
GLM was used to perform interaction analysis. All variables were log transformed. All associations were adjusted for age, gender, BMI (except BMI which was not adjusted for when the outcome was BMI) and total energy. The analysis was conducted on log-transformed variables. Abbreviations: GRS: genetic risk score, BMI: body mass index, WC: waist circumference, WHR: waist–hip ratio, BFP: body fat percentage, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin.