| Literature DB >> 35807677 |
Ana Rita F Coelho1,2, José Cochicho Ramalho2,3, Fernando Cebola Lidon1,2, Ana Coelho Marques1,2, Diana Daccak1,2, Cláudia Campos Pessoa1,2, Inês Carmo Luís1,2, Mauro Guerra4, Roberta G Leitão4, José Manuel N Semedo2,5, Maria Manuela Silva2,6, Isabel P Pais2,5, Nuno Leal1,2, Carlos Galhano1,2, Ana Paula Rodrigues3, Paulo Legoinha1,2, Maria José Silva2,3, Maria Simões1,2, Paula Scotti Campos2,5, Maria Fernanda Pessoa1,2, Fernando Henrique Reboredo1,2.
Abstract
Calcium is essential for plants, yet as its mobility is limited, the understanding of the rate of Ca2+ accumulation and deposition in tissues of tubers, as well as the interactions with other critical nutrients prompted this study. To assess the interactions and differential accumulation of micro and macronutrients in the tissues of tubers, Solanum tuberosum L. varieties Agria and Rossi were cultivated and, after the beginning of tuberization, four foliar sprayings (at 8-10 day intervals) with CaCl2 (3 and 6 kg ha-1) or Ca(NO3)2 (2 and 4 kg ha-1) solutions were performed. It was found that both fertilizers increased Ca accumulation in tubers (mostly in the parenchyma tissues located in the center of the equatorial region). The functioning of the photosynthetic apparatus was not affected until the 3rd application but was somewhat affected when approaching the end of the crop cycle (after the 4th application), although the lower dose of CaCl2 seemed to improve the photochemical use of energy, particularly when compared with the greater dose of Ca(NO3)2. Still, none of these impacts modified tuber height and diameter. Following the increased accumulation of Ca, in the tubers of both varieties, the mean contents of P, K, Na, Fe, and Zn revealed different accumulation patterns. Moreover, accumulation of K, Fe, Mn, and Zn prevailed in the epidermis, displaying a contrasting pattern relative to Ca. Therefore, Ca accumulation revealed a heterogeneous trend in the different regions analyzed, and Ca enrichment of tubers altered the accumulation of other nutrients.Entities:
Keywords: Solanum tuberosum L.; accumulation of nutrients; calcium; photosynthesis; potato biofortification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807677 PMCID: PMC9269299 DOI: 10.3390/plants11131725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Leaf chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in S. tuberosum L. cv. Agria after the 3rd (2 August) and 4th (14 August) calcium applications. Parameters include the maximum (Fv/Fm) and actual (Fv′/Fm′) PSII photochemical efficiency, photochemical quenching coefficient (qL), and non-photochemical quenching (qN). For each parameter, the different letters after the mean values ± S.E. (n = 5) express significant differences between Ca treatments within each date (A, B), or between dates for each Ca treatment (a, b).
Figure 2Leaf chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in S. tuberosum L. cv. Agria after the 3rd (2 August) and 4th (14 August) calcium applications. Parameters include: the estimate of quantum yields of non-cyclic electron transport (Y(II)) of regulated energy dissipation in PSII (Y(NPQ)) and of non-regulated energy dissipation in PSII (Y(NO)). For each parameter, the different letters after the mean values ± S.E. (n = 5) express significant differences between Ca treatments within each date (A, B), or between dates for each Ca treatment (a, b).
Figure 3Calcium concentration in S. tuberosum L. cv. Agria and Rossi at harvest, submitted to four foliar spraying applications (at 8–10 day intervals) of CaCl2 (3 and 6 kg ha−1) or Ca(NO3)2 (2 and 4 kg ha−1). Different letters after the mean values ± S.E. (three replicates of three independent series) express significant differences between Ca treatments in Agria variety (A, B), or between Ca treatments in Rossi variety (a, b). There was only a significant difference in Ca content between Agria and Rossi varieties in CaCl2 (3 kg ha−1), with Rossi content being significantly lower (*).
Mineral element concentrations in S. tuberosum L. cv. Agria and Rossi at harvest, submitted to four foliar sprayings (at 8–10 day intervals) with CaCl2 (3 and 6 kg ha−1) or Ca(NO3)2 (2 and 4 kg ha−1). Mean values ± S.E. (three replicates of three independent series).
| Treatments | P | K | Na | Fe | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ppm | ppm | ppm | ||
| Agria | ||||||
| Control | 0.588 ± 0.209a | 0.272 ± 0.006c | 87.5 ± 1.81a | 114 ± 2.97a | 53.6 ± 9.29a | |
| Ca(NO3)2 | 2 kg ha−1 | 0.845 ± 0.053a | 0.312 ± 0.003b | 76.6 ± 0.81b | 135 ± 3.22a | 31.8 ± 1.55b |
| 4 kg ha−1 | 0.448 ± 0.196a | 0.337 ± 0.010ab | 69.1 ± 2.79b | 134 ± 6.32a | 29.9 ± 1.83b | |
| CaCl2 | 3 kg ha−1 | 0.903 ± 0.114a | 0.370 ± 0.009a | 58.2 ± 1.38c | 123 ± 6.52a | 33.9 ± 0.81ab |
| 6 kg ha−1 | 1.08 ± 0.26a | 0.368 ± 0.004a | 63.9 ± 0.84b | 131 ± 5.35a | 31.4 ± 3.51b | |
|
| ||||||
| Control | 0.433 ± 0.096a | 0.270 ± 0.006b | 86.0 ± 2.47a | 71 ± 15.8b | 26.5 ± 0.39a | |
| Ca(NO3)2 | 2 kg ha−1 | 0.820 ± 0.052a | 0.279 ± 0.006b | 80.9 ± 1.76ab | 106 ± 6.13b | 27.2 ± 1.39a |
| 4 kg ha−1 | 0.451 ± 0.064a | 0.286 ± 0.007b | 71.5 ± 1.57b | 107 ± 4.48b | 27.6 ± 0.43a | |
| CaCl2 | 3 kg ha−1 | 0.811 ± 0.140a | 0.340 ± 0.009a | 72.6 ± 1.58b | 108 ± 3.31b | 26.8 ± 0.72a |
| 6 kg ha−1 | 0.705 ± 0.284a | 0.362 ± 0.016a | 39.5 ± 3.25c | 183 ± 27.7a | 31.0 ± 1.59a | |
Letters a–c represent significant differences between treatments for each variety (statistical analysis using the single factor ANOVA test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4Ca/Mg ratio in the epidermis and center, in the equatorial region of tubers of S. tuberosum L. cv. Agria and Rossi at harvest, after four foliar sprayings with Ca(NO3)2 (4 kg ha−1) and CaCl2 (6 kg ha−1). The mean values (±S.E.) of Mg in Agria after spraying with Ca(NO3)2 (4 kg ha−1) and CaCl2 (6 kg ha−1) were 192 ± 8 and 192 ± 2 ppm, respectively, and in Rossi were 194 ± 4 and 194 ± 6 ppm, respectively. For each variety and treatment, corresponds to the mean of 3 replicates from 3 independent series ± S.E. Letters a, b represent significant differences between the epidermis and center of tubers of each variety and treatment (statistical analysis using the single factor ANOVA test, p ≤ 0.05).
Chemical element content in different parts of the equatorial region, ranging from the epidermis (1) to the center (3) in tubers of S. tuberosum L. cv. Agria and Rossi at harvest, submitted to four foliar sprayings (at 8–10 day intervals) with CaCl2 (3 and 6 kg ha−1) or Ca(NO3)2 (2 and 4 kg ha−1). Mean values ± S.E. (three replicates of three independent series).
| Treatments | Regions | C | H | O | K | Fe | Mn | Zn | Cu | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g kg−1 | mg kg−1 | |||||||||
| Agria | ||||||||||
| Control | 1 | 419 ± 21Aa | 58.6 ± 2.9Aa | 465 ± 23Aa | 40.1 ± 2.0Bb | 1.12 ± 0.10Aa | 35.7 ± 1.8Ab | 17.5 ± 0.9Bc | 5.74 ± 0.29Cc | |
| 2 | 392 ± 20Aa | 54.8 ± 2.7Aa | 435 ± 22Aa | 74.2 ± 3.7Ab | 0.15 ± 0.00Ba | 6.10 ± 0.31Cb | 22.6 ± 1.1Bb | 7.03 ± 0.35Bbc | ||
| 3 | 386 ± 19Aa | 54.0 ± 2.7 Aa | 429 ± 21Aa | 72.4 ± 3.6Ab | 0.10 ± 0.00Ca | 8.43 ± 0.42Bc | 27.9 ± 1.4Ab | 9.90 ± 0.49Aab | ||
| Ca(NO3)2 | 2 kg ha−1 | 1 | 428 ± 21Aa | 59.9 ± 3.0Aa | 475 ± 24Aa | 27.9 ± 1.4Bc | 0.40 ± 0.00Ac | 37.23 ± 0.36Ab | 12.9 ± 0.7Bc | 4.17 ± 0.21Bc |
| 2 | 418 ± 21Aa | 58.4 ± 2.9Aa | 464 ± 23Aa | 50.2 ± 2.5Ac | 0.10 ± 0.00Bb | 3.27 ± 0.16Cc | 23.4 ± 1.2Ab | 8.01 ± 0.40Ab | ||
| 3 | 404 ± 20Aa | 56.4 ± 2.8 Aa | 448 ± 22Aa | 56.9 ± 2.9Ac | 0.10 ± 0.00Ba | 10.1 ± 0.5Bbc | 30.9 ± 1.5Ab | 10.1 ± 0.50Aab | ||
| 4 kg ha−1 | 1 | 400 ± 20Aa | 56.0 ± 2.8Aa | 445 ± 22Aa | 76.2 ± 3.8Aa | 1.42 ± 0.10Aa | 52.1 ± 2.6Aa | 37.4 ± 1.9Aa | 9.67 ± 0.48Ab | |
| 2 | 328 ± 16Bb | 45.9 ± 2.3Aa | 365 ± 18Aa | 85.5 ± 4.3Ab | 0.10 ± 0.00Bb | 4.41 ± 0.22Cc | 25.1 ± 1.3Bb | 5.33 ± 0.27Bc | ||
| 3 | 369 ± 19Bab | 51.6 ± 2.6 Aa | 410 ± 21Aa | 72.1 ± 3.6Ab | 0.10 ± 0.00Ba | 6.71 ± 0.34Bc | 18.2 ± 0.9Cc | 7.83 ± 0.39Bc | ||
| CaCl2 | 3 kg ha−1 | 1 | 375 ± 19Aa | 52.5 ± 2.6Aa | 416 ± 21ABa | 50.0 ± 2.5Bb | 0.50 ± 0.00Ab | 22.1 ± 1.1Ac | 25.3 ± 1.3ABb | 7.45 ± 0.37Bb |
| 2 | 416 ± 21Aa | 58.3 ± 2.9Aa | 462 ± 23Aa | 55.1 ± 2.8Bc | 0.10 ± 0.00Bb | 10.7 ± 0.5Ba | 19.7 ± 1.0Bb | 8.67 ± 0.43Bb | ||
| 3 | 363 ± 18Aa | 50.7 ± 2.5 Aa | 402 ± 20Ba | 76.0 ± 3.8Ab | 0.10 ± 0.00Ba | 12.1 ± 0.6Bb | 29.8 ± 1.5Ab | 13.1 ± 0.70Aa | ||
| 6 kg ha−1 | 1 | 383 ± 19Aa | 53.6 ± 2.7Aa | 426 ± 21Aa | 78.2 ± 3.9Ba | 0.80 ± 0.00Ab | 38.0 ± 1.9Ab | 40.1 ± 2.0Aa | 25.0 ± 1.30Aa | |
| 2 | 363 ± 18Aab | 50.8 ± 2.5Aa | 403 ± 20Aa | 99.2 ± 5.0AABa | 0.12 ± 0.01Bb | 9.37 ± 0.5Ca | 37.6 ± 1.9Aa | 26.7 ± 1.30Aa | ||
| 3 | 344 ± 17Aa | 49.1 ± 2.4 Aa | 382 ± 19Aa | 110 ± 50BAa | 0.12 ± 0.01Ba | 18.3 ± 0.9Ba | 37.9 ± 1.9Aa | 10.7 ± 0.50Bab | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| Control | 1 | 425 ± 21Aa | 59.5 ± 3.0Aa | 472 ± 24Aa | 30.4 ± 1.5Cc | 0.70 ± 0.03Ab | 13.8 ± 0.7Ad | 8.77 ± 0.4Cd | n.d. | |
| 2 | 394 ± 20Aa | 55.1 ± 2.8Aa | 438 ± 22Aa | 65.4 ± 3.3Bb | 0.07 ± 0.01Bb | 11.5 ± 0.6Ac | 23.7 ± 1.2Bb | 0.14 ± 0.01c | ||
| 3 | 379 ± 19Aa | 53.1 ± 2.7 Aa | 421 ± 21Aa | 103 ± 5.0Aa | 0.06 ± 0.01 Ba | 13.2 ± 0.7Ab | 35.5 ± 1.8Aa | n.d. | ||
| Ca(NO3)2 | 2 kg ha−1 | 1 | 426 ± 21Aa | 59.5 ± 3.0Aa | 472 ± 24Aa | 36.5 ± 1.8Bc | 0.63 ± 0.03Ab | 28.9 ± 1.4Ac | 18.3 ± 0.9ABc | 6.42 ± 0.32Bc |
| 2 | 420 ± 21Aa | 58.8 ± 3.0Aa | 467 ± 23Aa | 48.5 ± 2.4Bc | 0.04 ± 0.01Bb | 5.7 ± 0.28Cd | 15.6 ± 0.8Bc | 6.20 ± 0.31Bb | ||
| 3 | 371 ± 19a | 51.8 ± 2.6Aa | 411 ± 21Aa | 60.0 ± 3.0Ab | 0.08 ± 0.01Ba | 21.8 ± 1.1Ba | 25.6 ± 1.3Aa | 9.25 ± 0.46Aa | ||
| 4 kg ha−1 | 1 | 350 ± 18Aa | 49.0 ± 2.5Aa | 389 ± 19Aa | 88.0 ± 4.4Aa | 1.34 ± 0.07Ab | 71.1 ± 3.6Aa | 68.7 ± 3.4Aa | 23.00 ± 1.2Ab | |
| 2 | 370 ± 19Aa | 51.7 ± 2.6Aa | 410 ± 21Aa | 29.4 ± 1.5Bd | 0.08 ± 0.01Bb | 19.7 ± 1.0Bb | 16.3 ± 0.8Bc | 5.83 ± 0.29Bb | ||
| 3 | 371 ± 19Aa | 51.9 ± 2.6 Aa | 412 ± 21Aa | 28.1 ± 1.4Bd | 0.09 ± 0.01Ba | 25.9 ± 1.3Ba | 14.3 ± 0.7Bb | 7.67 ± 0.38Ba | ||
| CaCl2 | 3 kg ha−1 | 1 | 362 ± 18Aa | 50.6 ± 2.5Aa | 401 ± 20Aa | 80.1 ± 4.0Ba | 2.26 ± 0.11Aa | 53.2 ± 2.7Ab | 61.1 ± 3.1Aa | 32.60 ± 1.6Aa |
| 2 | 363 ± 18Aa | 50.7 ± 2.5Aa | 403 ± 20Aa | 117.0 ± 6.0Aa | 0.15 ± 0.01Ba | 57.0 ± 2.9Aa | 53.1 ± 2.7Aa | 21.10 ± 1.1Ba | ||
| 3 | 390 ± 20Aa | 54.6 ± 2.7 Aa | 433 ± 22Aa | 38.5 ± 1.9Ca | 0.06 ± 0.01Ca | 8.98 ± 0.45Bc | 18.5 ± 0.9Bb | 9.07 ± 0.50Ca | ||
| 6 kg ha−1 | 1 | 413 ± 21Aa | 57.8 ± 2.9Aa | 458 ± 23Aa | 51.3 ± 2.6Ab | 0.11 ± 0.01Ac | 13.0 ± 0.7Ad | 25.3 ± 0.0Ab | 9.83 ± 0.46Ac | |
| 2 | 363 ± 18Aa | 50.8 ± 2.5Aa | 403 ± 20Aa | 30.6 ± 1.5Bd | 0.09 ± 0.01Aab | 4.9 ± 0.25Cd | 13.3 ± 4.4Bc | 8.61 ± 0.43Ab | ||
| 3 | 382 ± 19Aa | 53.4 ± 2.7 Aa | 423 ± 21Aa | 36.1 ± 1.8Bc | 0.10 ± 0.01Aa | 8.9 ± 0.44Bc | 14.2 ± 0.7Bb | 9.22 ± 0.46Aa | ||
Different letters express significant differences (p < 0.05) among different tissues of each treatment (A, B, C), or within each tissue from different treatments of the same genotype (a–d). “n.d.” means not detected.
Height, diameter, and colorimeter parameters of the fresh pulp from tubers of S. tuberosum L. cv. Agria and Rossi at harvest, submitted to four foliar sprayings (at 8–10 day intervals) with CaCl2 (3 and 6 kg ha−1) or Ca(NO3)2 (2 and 4 kg ha−1). Mean values ± S.E. (10 randomized tubers per treatment (10 samples of each treatment) and from three independent plant series).
| Treatments | Height | Diameter | Color Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | a* | b* | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Control | 9.30 ± 0.19a | 5.60 ± 0.09a | 54.4 ± 1.31a | −2.89 ± 0.17a | 20.5 ± 0.22a | |
| Ca(NO3)2 | 2 kg ha−1 | 11.80 ± 0.31a | 5.47 ± 0.13a | 56.8 ± 0.86a | −2.90 ± 0.13a | 21.3 ± 0.49a |
| 4 kg ha−1 | 11.40 ± 0.91a | 4.77 ± 0.15a | 59.5 ± 0.36a | −3.31 ± 0.07a | 22.3 ± 0.33a | |
| CaCl2 | 3 kg ha−1 | 9.50 ± 0.19a | 5.70 ± 0.12a | 58.8 ± 0.50a | −2.95 ± 0.21a | 22.0 ± 0.29a |
| 6 kg ha−1 | 9.90 ± 0.68a | 4.73 ± 0.28a | 55.8 ± 1.29a | −2.85 ± 0.08a | 21.7 ± 1.39a | |
|
| ||||||
| Control | 9.60 ± 0.32a | 6.24 ± 0.15a | 65.9 ± 1.19a | −2.52 ± 0.14c | 16.3 ± 0.30a | |
| Ca(NO3)2 | 2 kg ha−1 | 7.03 ± 0.53a | 4.50 ± 0.22a | 63.3 ± 0.73a | −2.64 ± 0.12c | 14.2 ± 0.27a |
| 4 kg ha−1 | 9.32 ± 1.58a | 5.50 ± 0.26a | 63.3 ± 1.12a | −2.75 ± 0.07c | 15.7 ± 0.24a | |
| CaCl2 | 3 kg ha−1 | 9.30 ± 0.32a | 5.65 ± 0.21a | 59.9 ± 2.55a | −2.15 ± 0.09a | 15.1 ± 0.77a |
| 6 kg ha−1 | 8.91 ± 1.17a | 5.61 ± 0.49a | 61.4 ± 1.88a | −2.34 ± 0.05b | 15.1 ± 0.65a | |
Letters a–c represent significant differences between treatments for each variety (statistical analysis using the single-factor ANOVA test, p ≤ 0.05).
Planting, foliar application, and harvest dates in Agria and Rossi varieties.
| Varieties | Planting | Foliar Applications | Harvest | Treatments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1° | 2° | 3° | 4° | ||||
| Agria | 4 May 2018 | 6 July 2018 | 16 July 2018 | 26 July 2018 | 3 August 2018 | 4 September 2018 | CaCl2 (3 and 6 kg ha−1) or, Ca(NO3)2 (2 and 4 kg ha−1) |
| Rossi | 11 May 2018 | 25 July 2018 | 3 August 2018 | 14 August 2018 | 24 September 2018 | 24 September 2018 | |
Figure 5Orthophoto maps of the fields in which the varieties were implemented and the biofortification treatments were carried out (Agria—(A); Rossi—(B)). The images were obtained by UAV on 18 May 2018 and 12 May 2018, respectively, for fields A and B.