| Literature DB >> 35807517 |
Joelle Mesmar1, Rola Abdallah1, Adnan Badran2, Marc Maresca3, Elias Baydoun1.
Abstract
Herbal medicine has been gaining special interest as an alternative choice of treatment for several diseases, being generally accessible, cost-effective and safe, with fewer side-effects compared to chemically synthesized medicines. Over 25% of drugs worldwide are derived from plants, and surveys have shown that, when available, herbal medicine is the preferred choice of treatment. Origanum syriacum (Lamiaceae) is a widely used medicinal plant in the Middle East, both as a home and a folk remedy, and in the food and beverage industry. Origanum syriacum contains numerous phytochemical compounds, including flavonoids, phenols, essential oils, and many others. Because of its bioactive compounds, O. syriacum possesses antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antiparasitic capacities. In addition, it can be beneficial in the treatment of various diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and peptic ulcers. In this review, the chemical compositions of different types of extracts and essential oils from this herb will first be specified. Then, the pharmacological uses of these extracts and essential oils in various contexts and diseases will be discussed, putting emphasis on their efficacy and safety. Finally, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of O. syriacum phytochemicals in disease treatment will be described as a basis for further investigation into the plant's pharmacological role.Entities:
Keywords: Lamiaceae; Origanum syriacum; anticancer; antimicrobial; antioxidant; herbal medicine; pharmacology; phytochemistry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807517 PMCID: PMC9268277 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27134272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Major phytochemical components of Origanum Syriacum extracts. (A): Aqueous, (B): Ethanolic, and (C): Methanolic extracts.
Summary of phytochemical composition of Origanum Syriacum extracts.
| Plant Part | Extract Type | Technique | Main Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerial parts | Ethanolic extract | MS | Isolation of 5 compounds: thymoquinol 2,5-O- β-diglucopyranoside, carvacrol 2-O- β-glucopyranosyl-(1->2)- β-glucopyranoside, | [ |
| Aerial parts | Methanolic extract | EI-MS | Identification of 5 compounds: 5-hydroxy-6,7-(2′′-isopropanol-dihydrofuran)-flavonyl-(4′-7′′′) 5′′′,4′′′′, dihydroxy flavone, as well as vicenin, vitexin, isovitexin, and isoorientin | [ |
| Aerial parts | Methanolic extract | UV | Isolation of 11 flavonoids: | [ |
| Aerial parts | Methanolic extract | LC-MS | Isolation of rosmarinic acid, oleanolic acid, and ursolic acid | [ |
| Leaves | Ethanolic extract | HPLC | Isolation of 11 phenolic compounds (catechol was the major one), 9 flavonoids (rutin was the major one) and 24 volatile essential oils (carvacrol and thymol were the major ones) | [ |
| Leaves | Ethanolic and Aqueous extracts | GC-MS | 12 phytochemicals were isolated in the ethanolic extract with carvacrol and thymol found in high amounts. | [ |
Figure 2Major phytochemical components of Origanum syriacum essential oil.
Figure 3Major metabolites reported from various parts of Origanum syriacum. (A): Aerial parts, (B): Leaves, (C): Flowers.
Summary of the essential-oil composition and the volatiles profile from different parts of Origanum syriacum plants from different areas.
| Plant Part | Technique | Location | Main Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerial parts | GC-MS | Egypt | 45 constituents were identified; carvacrol is the main component. The carvacrol variety found on Mt. Sinai is noticeably different due to the presence of geraniol, geranyl esters, and ethyl cinnamate | [ |
| Leaves and flowers | GLC | Lebanon | Essential oil component was about 3% (wt/vol) and the major components of this oil were carvacrol and thymol | [ |
| Herbal parts | GC | Egypt | 40 constituents were collected; thymol was the main component and interestingly, | [ |
| Leaves | GC | Dortyol district at an altitude of 200 m, Southern Turkey | 13 components were characterized. The major components were: γ-terpinene (27.79%), carvacrol (26.97%), | [ |
| Flowering aerial parts | GC | Baskinta Mountain at an altitude of up to 1500 m, Lebanon | 36 compounds were found, representing 90.6% of the total oil. The most abundant components were thymol (24.7%), carvacrol (17.6%), γ-terpinene (12.6%), | [ |
| Leaves | GC-MS | Amman | 30 constituents were found; carvacol (41.1%), | [ |
| Entire plant (stems, leaves, and flowers) | GC-MS | Sekem company plantation in the city of Bilbeis in the Sharkea region, northeastern Cairo, Egypt | 23 compounds were identified, representing 94.5% of the total oil, the major constituents being thymol (21.04%) and γ-terpinene (18.96%) | [ |
| Leaves | GC-MS | Arabsalim, South Lebanon | 5 constituents were reported; carvacrol (78.4%), thymol (17.9%), and thymoquinone (2.5%) were the most abundant | [ |
| Aerial parts | GC | Al-Husn cultivar in Sinai (AlAbtal village), Egypt | 23 constituents were found; carvacrol (76.06%), thymol (13.29%), | [ |
| Entire plant | GC-MS | Wild plants: Wadi-Firan | 50 constituents were found and differences between constituents of wild and cultivated plants were reported; carvacrol (81.38%) was the most abundant in the cultivated type and thymol (31.73%) in the wild type | [ |
| Aerial parts | GC | Lebanon | 27 constituents were found; carvacol (60.8%), | [ |
| Stems and leaves | GC-MS | Lebanon | 34 compounds were found; carvacrol (60.1%) was the most abundant | [ |
| The branches (leaves and buds) | GC | Western and coastal governorates of Syria | 15 constituents were found; β–myrcene (21.93%), carvacol (19.23%), | [ |
| Leaves | GC-MS | West Bank, Palestine | 17 constituents were found; thymol (19.99%) (39.87%) in Qalqilya and Tulkarm, respectively, and α-terpinene (27.95%) (36.8%) in Jerusalem and Bethlehem, respectively | [ |
| Aerial parts | GC | South Lebanon | 35 constituents were found; α | [ |
Antioxidant activities of Origanum syriacum.
| Method of Study | Main Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)-radical scavenging activity | The deodorized and non-deodorized methanolic extracts as well as the deodorized hot-water extract had high antioxidant and free-radical scavenging activity with IC50 values of 21.40, 26.98 and 42.80 µg/mL, respectively, while the essential oil showed weaker activity with an IC50 value of 134.00 µg/mL | [ |
| The essential oil showed a significant scavenging ability in a concentration-dependent manner and had an IC50 value of 1.7 μg/mL | [ | |
| The water-soluble extract was capable of scavenging DDPH radicals in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 value of about 400 μg/mL | [ | |
| The essential oil showed a strong free-radical-scavenging effect with an IC50 value of 6.6 mg/mL | [ | |
| The essential oils showed a strong inhibitory effect on DPPH free-radical production in a dose-dependent manner with IC50 values ranging from 31.60 to 63.10 μg/mL, depending on the region the plant was taken from in the West Bank area of Palestine | [ | |
| The essential oil exhibited a radical-scavenging activity in a concentration-dependent manner, with 17.12% DPPH-radical scavenging at 500 mg/mL | [ | |
| The ethanolic extract showed high free-radical scavenging in a concentration-dependent manner, with 50% inhibition at 200 μg/mL and a scavenging capacity IC50 of 145 μg/mL | [ | |
| DPPH by TLC | The essential oil revealed at least three spots with the DPPH reagent: carvacrol, thymol (which had IC50 values of 245.00 and 161.70 μg/mL) and | [ |
| β-carotene-linoleic acid bleaching inhibition | The inhibition of linoleic acid oxidation was observed with all extracts: deodorized hot water (93.1%), deodorized methanol (88.3%) and methanol (81.6%), dichloromethane (80.5%), hexane (71.5%), and essential oil (58.8%), in accordance with the total phenolic content of each extract | [ |
| The essential oil inhibited the oxidation of linoleic acid after 30 min and 60 min incubation with an IC50 value of 33.6 μg/mL and 58.9 μg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| The ethanolic extract showed high bleaching inhibition at 63.1% | [ | |
| Ascorbate-iron (III)-catalyzed phospholipid peroxidation | The water-soluble extract showed strong hydroxyl-radical scavenging activity as it was able to inhibit the formation of 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) by scavenging hydroxyl radicals generated by ascorbate-iron (III) in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 of about 600 μg/mL | [ |
| Ferric-reducing antioxidant capacity (FRAC) | The essential oil showed strong ferric-reducing capacity in a concentration-dependent manner with a Trolox concentration of 2.87 mmol/L at 50 g/L | [ |
| Iron (II) chelation activity | The water-soluble extract also was shown to be an effective chelator of iron in a dose-dependent manner with approximate IC50 value of 0.9 mg/mL | [ |
| The essential oil was capable of chelating iron (II) in a concentration-dependent manner with an EC50 value of 0.89 mg/mL, better than ascorbic acid and BHT | [ | |
| Iron (III) to iron (II) reducing activity | The water-soluble extract was able to reduce iron (III) in a concentration-dependent manner | [ |
| Inhibition of lipid peroxidation of buffered egg yolk by the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS) assay | The essential oil showed a strong lipid peroxidation inhibitory ability with an EC50 value of 3.99 mg/mL, similar to that of the ascorbic acid control | [ |
| Nonsite-specific hydroxyl radical-mediated 2-deoxy-D-ribose degradation | The water-soluble extract was capable of inhibiting TBARS formation with an IC50 value of about 1.8 mg/mL by scavenging hydroxyl radicals before reacting with the 2-deoxy-D-ribose substrate | [ |
| Site-specific hydroxyl radical-mediated 2-deoxy-D-ribose degradation | The extract was capable of preventing the oxidative degradation of 2-deoxy-D-ribose by interrupting the generation of hydroxyl radicals at an IC50 value of about 0.2 mg/mL through iron (III) chelation and deactivation | [ |
| Oxidative stability of fat by the Rancimat assay | The essential oil showed some oxidative stability of lard, with an antioxidant activity index (AAI) of 1.1, lower than that of ascorbic acid (1.44) and BHT (2.42) | [ |
| Reducing power by the method of Oyaizu | The essential oils showed some reducing power in a dose-dependent manner with an absorbance of 0.77 at 500 mg/mL, lower than that of ascorbic acid (0.96 at 10 mg/mL) | [ |
| Thiocyanate method | The essential oil showed an antioxidant activity, as measured by the formation of peroxides, in a concentration-dependent manner that was similar to that of the BHT control | [ |
Antimicrobial and pesticidal activities of Origanum syriacum. MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration.
| Organisms | Used Extract | Main Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| Ethanolic | Inhibition zone of 40.00 mm and an MIC of 0.13 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 0.28 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 37 mm at 4 µg/disc, much higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (14 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (16 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 30.60 mm and an MIC of 0.13 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 0.14 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 44 mm at 4 µg/disc, much higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (11 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (17 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 39 mm at 4 µg/disc, much higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (15 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (18 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 34.25 mm and an MIC of 0.13 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 0.06 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 26.50 mm and an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 36 mm at 4 µg/disc, much higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (16 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (17 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 19.00 and 11.00 mm for the cultivated and wild-type | [ | |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 30 mm at 4 µg/disc, much higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (11 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 26.25 mm and an MIC of 2.25 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol and the positive control netilmicin had MICs of 0.56 mg/mL and 1 × 10−2 mg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 25.00 and 17.00 mm for the cultivated and wild-type | [ | |
| Ethanolic | MIC value of 780 µg/mL and an inhibition zone of 14.5 mm using a concentration of 100 mg/mL. In comparison the positive control gentamycin had an inhibition zone of 23.8 mm | [ | |
| Essential oil | MIC value of 256 µg/mL | [ | |
|
| Ethanolic | Moderate activity against two | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 21 mm at 4 µg/disc, higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (15 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (14 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 21.75 mm and an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol and the positive control netilmicin had MICs of 2.25 mg/mL and 1 × 10−2 mg/mL, respectively | [ |
| Ethanolic | MIC value of 390 µg/mL and an inhibition zone of 15.5 mm using a concentration of 100 mg/mL. In comparison the positive control gentamycin had an inhibition zone of 24.8 mm | [ | |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 29.00 mm at 100% dose, attributed to thymol, citral, 1,8-cineole, γ-terpinene, | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 24.50 mm and an MIC of 0.13 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 0.28 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 24 mm at 4 µg/disc, higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (19 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (15 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ -terpinene in its oil | [ |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of >60.00 mm and an MIC of 0.54 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 0.14 mg/mL | [ | |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 26.00 mm and an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 34 mm at 4 µg/disc. In comparison the positive controls used ampicillin (10 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (13 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
| Methanolic | MIC value of 2 mg/mL using a saturated solution of extract in DMSO | [ | |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 10.50 mm and an MIC of 9.00 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol and the positive control netilmicin had MICs of 4.5 mg/mL and 1 × 10−2 mg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Ethanolic | MIC value of 780 µg/mL and an inhibition zone of 14.7 mm using a concentration of 100 mg/mL. In comparison the positive control gentamycin had an inhibition zone of 24.5 mm | [ | |
|
| Ethanolic | MIC value of 390 µg/mL and an inhibition zone of 13.8 mm using a concentration of 100 mg/mL. In comparison the positive control gentamycin had an inhibition zone of 23.3 mm | [ |
|
| Ethanolic | MIC value of 780 µg/mL and an inhibition zone of 12.8 mm using a concentration of 100 mg/mL. In comparison the positive control gentamycin had an inhibition zone of 23.2 mm | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 36 mm at 4 µg/disc, much higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (16 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (21 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 26.50 mm and an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol and the positive control netilmicin had MICs of 0.28 mg/mL and 8 × 10−3 mg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 28–36 mm, depending on the strain used. In comparison, control antibiotics used had inhibition zones ranging from 8 to 32 mm | [ | |
| Essential oil | MIC value ranging from 0.781 to 3.132 mg/mL, depending on the ecotype. | [ | |
| Essential oil | MIC value of 128 µg/mL | [ | |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 32.00 and 24.50 mm for the cultivated and wild-type | [ | |
| Ethanolic | MIC value of 780 µg/mL and an inhibition zone of 15.0 mm using a concentration of 100 mg/mL. In comparison the positive control gentamycin had an inhibition zone of 23.7 mm | [ | |
| Methanolic | MIC value of 1 mg/mL using a saturated solution of extract in DMSO | [ | |
|
| Essential oil | MIC value ranging from 0.049 to 3.132 mg/mL, depending on the ecotype | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 44.00 mm and an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol had an MIC of 0.28 mg/mL | [ |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 18–25 mm, depending on the strain used. In comparison, control antibiotics used had inhibition zones ranging from 6 to 20 mm | [ | |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 25 mm at 4 µg/disc, higher than the positive controls used, ampicillin (13 mm at 10 µg/disc) and streptomycin (17 mm at 10 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Essential oil | MICs of 0.25–2.5 mg/mL and 0.25–5.0 mg/mL for cultivated and wild-type | [ |
|
| Essential oil | MICs of 0.25–2.5 mg/mL and 0.25–5.0 mg/mL for cultivated and wild-type | [ |
|
| Essential oil | MICs of 1.25 mg/mL and 5.0 mg/mL for cultivated and wild-type | [ |
| Essential oil | At 0.1 µL/mL, the oil completely inhibited mycelial growth of the fungus. An effect was also observed at 0.02 and 0.05 µL/mL with 22.98 and 54.23% inhibition, respectively | [ | |
|
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of 32–38 mm, depending on the strain used. In comparison, control antibiotics used had an inhibition zone of 6 mm | [ |
| Essential oil | Inhibition zone of >60.00 mm and an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol and the positive control Amphotericin B had MICs of 0.28 mg/mL and 1 × 10−3 mg/mL, respectively | [ | |
| Essential oil | MIC values ranging from 0.024 to 1.563, depending on the ecotype | [ | |
| Essential oil | MIC value of 128 µg/mL | [ | |
| Ethanolic | MIC values ranging between 150 and 625 µg/mL and inhibition zones of 22.5 and 29.5 mm, respectively, depending on the isolate used and using a crude extract concentration of 100 mg/mL (in comparison the positive control, Amphotericin B had an inhibition zone between 29.5 and 33.5 mm) | [ | |
| Methanolic | MIC value of 1 mg/mL using a saturated solution of extract in DMSO | [ | |
|
| Essential oil | Strong activity with an inhibition zone of >60.00 mm and an MIC of 1.12 mg/mL (in comparison, carvacrol and the positive control Amphotericin B had MICs of 0.28 mg/mL and 1 × 10−3 mg/mL, respectively) | [ |
|
| Essential oil | At 0.1 µL/mL, the oil completely inhibited mycelial growth of the fungus. An effect was also observed at 0.02 and 0.05 µL/mL with 31.02 and 66.02% inhibition, respectively | [ |
|
| Ethanolic | 84.3% inhibition at a 45 μg/mL, comparable to the positive control Econazole with a 100% inhibition at 5 μg/mL | [ |
|
| Essential oil | At 0.1 µL/mL, the oil completely inhibited mycelial growth of the fungus. An effect of was also observed at 0.02 and 0.05 µL/mL with 41.99 and 93.48% inhibition, respectively | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Strong activity with an inhibition zone of 28 mm at 4 µg/disc, much higher than the positive controls used, Nystatin (18 mm at 30 µg/disc), attributed to the carvacrol and γ-terpinene in its oil | [ |
|
| Essential oil | MIC value of 64 µg/mL | [ |
| Ethanolic | 93.6% inhibition at a 45 μg/mL, comparable to the positive control Econazole with a 100% inhibition at 5 μg/mL | [ | |
|
| |||
|
| Methanolic | A concentration of 32 mg/mL killed all trophozoites within 3 h and cysts within 24 h. The effect was concentration dependent. | [ |
|
| Essential oil | The oil was active against the larvae with LC50 values of 0.087 and 0.067 mg/mL after 24 and 48 h treatment, respectively | [ |
|
| |||
|
| Essential oil | LC50/LD50 of 58.7 μg/adult, consistent with that of carvacrol with a value of 59.3 μg/adult | [ |
|
| Essential oil | LC50 of 36 mg/mL. In comparison carvacrol and thymol had LC50 values of 36 mg/L and 37.6 mg/L | [ |
|
| Essential oil | LC50 of 36 mg/mL. In comparison, carvacrol and thymol had LC50 values of 37.6 and 36 mg/mL, respectively | [ |
|
| Essential oil | Moderate adult mortality at a 500 ppm, with 60% after 7 days of exposure. At 1000 ppm, adult mortality was 93.3% after 4 h, and 97.8% after 6 days of exposure. | [ |
|
| Essential oil | LC50/LD50 of 2.1 mg/L. In comparison carvacrol had a value of 1.6 mL/L | [ |
|
| Essential oil | LC50/LD50 of 103.3 μg/larva. In comparison that of carvacrol was 38.3 μg/larva | [ |
Figure 4Origanum syriacum modulates the inflammatory response. Origanum syriacum blocks the hydrolysis of arachidonic acid from phospholipid membranes by the phospholipase A2 sPLA2-GV, which is normally released by inflammatory stimuli resulting from pathogen infection and oxidative stress. Origanum syriacum also blocks the conversion of arachidonic acid to pro-inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes by inhibiting COX-1 and 5-LOX enzymes, respectively, in addition to inhibiting the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-10, therefore playing a major role in the pathophysiology of inflammation. OS: Origanum syriacum; sPLA2-GV: Secretory phospholipase A2-Group V; COX-1: cyclooxygenase-1; 5-LOX: 5-lipooxygenase; IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-10: interleukin-10.
Figure 5Origanum syriacum exhibits neuroprotective activities on fast excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. Origanum syriacum regulates the glutamatergic neurotransmission system by stabilizing the desensitized/deactivated conformation of the glutamate receptor AMPAR, thus reducing its activity and decreasing the risk of neurotoxicity. Origanum syriacum also restores cholinergic neurotransmission by inhibiting the activity of AChE and preventing the hydrolysis of acetylcholine to choline and acetate. OS: Origanum syriacum; AMPAR: α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor; AChE: acetylcholinesterase enzyme.
Figure 6Origanum syriacum exhibits antimelanogenic properties by blocking melanogenesis. Origanum syriacum reduced the production of melanin by blocking the activity of the tyrosinase enzyme in a competitive inhibition model. OS: Origanum syriacum.