| Literature DB >> 31297014 |
Mayadah Shehadeh1, Nidal Jaradat2, Motasem Al-Masri3, Abdel Naser Zaid2, Fatima Hussein2, Ahmad Khasati4, Ghadeer Suaifan1, Rula Darwish5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Origanum syriacum (O. syriacum) is a very popular edible and medicinal plant in the East Mediterranean countries. The aims of the current study were to use microwave-ultrasonic assisted hydrodistillation (MUAHD) method to produce essential oils (EOs) from wild O. syriacum samples collected from four different geographical areas in The West Bank using water as a solvent, determine the phytochemical profile using GC-MS analysis and assess their antioxidant and antibacterial potential.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial; Antioxidant; Essential oil; GC-MS; Microwave-ultrasonic assisted hydrodistillation; Origanum syriacum
Year: 2019 PMID: 31297014 PMCID: PMC6598215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.03.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.330
O. syriacum EOs yield obtained by conventional and microwave ultrasonic assisted hydrodistillation.
| Origin | Yield (% V/W) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HD | MUAHD | ||
| Palestine | 1.1 – 1.3 | 1.7–3.3 | ( |
| Jordan | 0.6–1.6 | NA | ( |
| Lebanon | 1.3 – 4.4 | NA | ( |
| Turkey | 0.8–3.5 | NA | ( |
| Iran | 0.9–1.7 | NA | ( |
| Morocco | 0.8.2–2.61 | NA | ( |
HD: Hydrodistillation.
MUAHD: Microwave Ultrasonic Assisted Hydrodistillation.
: Current study.
GC-MS analysis of wild O. syriacum leaves EO samples from The West Bank/Palestinian Authority.
| No | Compound | Molecular Formula | Molecular Weight | Retention Time | RI | Relative Content (%) of EOs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q* | J* | T* | B* | ||||||
| 1 | α-Thujene | C10H16 | 136 | 5.893 | 930 | 1.04 | 0.74 | 1.35 | 2.86 |
| 2 | α- Pinene | C10H16 | 136 | 6.115 | 939 | 1.37 | 1.35 | 1.15 | 2.00 |
| 3 | β-Pinene | C10H16 | 136 | 7.740 | 979 | 2.57 | 2.11 | 1.18 | 2.16 |
| 4 | 1-Phellandrene | C10H16 | 136 | 8.352 | 1003 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.31 | 0.60 |
| 5 | α-Terpinene | C10H16 | 136 | 8.718 | 1017 | 12.97 | 27.95 | 21.97 | 36.80 |
| 6 | tert-Butyl benzene | C10H14 | 134 | 9.225 | – | 1.36 | 0.97 | 0.68 | 1.27 |
| 7 | γ-Terpinene | C10H16 | 136 | 10.237 | 1060 | 3.05 | 21.14 | 6.70 | 10.51 |
| 8 | α-Terpinolene | C10H16 | 136 | 11.290 | 1086 | 0.47 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.94 |
| 9 | 4-Terpineol | C10H18O | 154 | 15.281 | 1177 | 2.10 | 0.99 | 0.62 | 0.83 |
| 10 | Thymoquinone | C10H12O2 | 164 | 18.274 | 1252 | 2.17 | 1.28 | 1.24 | 2.10 |
| 11 | Thymol | C10H14O | 150 | 20.104 | 1290 | 19.99 | 11.74 | 39.87 | 5.90 |
| 12 | Carvacrol | C10H14O | 150 | 20.461 | 1299 | 18.99 | 13.64 | 15.44 | 21.40 |
| 13 | Caryophyllene | C15H24 | 204 | 25.382 | 1419 | 12.89 | 6.38 | 1.93 | 2.20 |
| 14 | α-Amorphene | C15H24 | 150 | 28.130 | 1483 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 0.21 | – |
| 15 | delta-Cadinene | C15H24 | 204 | 29.389 | 1522 | – | 0.39 | – | – |
| 16 | Caryophyllene oxide | C15H24O | 220 | 31.861 | 1583 | 2.19 | 0.92 | 0.43 | 0.50 |
| 17 | Octahydro-tetramethyl- phenanthrene | C18H26 | 242 | 43.799 | – | 0.82 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.51 |
| Identified Phytochemical Groups | |||||||||
| Monoterpene hydrocarbons | 22.15 | 54.77 | 33.41 | 55.87 | |||||
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | 43.25 | 27.65 | 57.17 | 30.23 | |||||
| Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | 13.53 | 7.14 | 2.11 | 2.20 | |||||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 2.19 | 0.92 | 0.43 | 0.50 | |||||
| Non terpene hydrocarbons | 2.18 | 1.34 | 1.13 | 1.78 | |||||
| Total of phytochemical groups | 83.3 | 91.82 | 94.28 | 90.58 | |||||
Q*: Qalqilya, J*: Jerusalem, T*: Tulkarem, B*: Bethlehem.
Compounds are listed based on their elution order identified according to WILEY, NIST and ADAMS-2007 libraries.
= Monoterpene.
= Oxygynated monoterpene.
= Sesquiterpene.
= Oxygenated sesquiterpene.
= Non terpene hydrocarbons.
RI: (Retention Indices) linear (arithmetic) retention index calculated on a DB-5 equivalent column.
Fig. 1Major terpenes detected in O. syriacum EOs.
In vitro antioxidant activity of O. syriacum leaves EOs and the standard Trolox.
| Concentration (µg/mL) | DPPH Percentage Inhibition Induced by | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | |||||
| Trolox | Jerusalem | Bethlehem | Tulkarem | Qalqilya | |
| 1 | 50.72 ± 0.29 | 9.65 ± 1.77 | 17.30 ± 0.00 | 12.35 ± 2.34 | 22.80 ± 0.76 |
| 2 | 51.00 ± 0.58 | 13.40 ± 2.60 | 20.80 ± 1.67 | 12.85 ± 0.85 | 25.00 ± 1.25 |
| 3 | 70.20 ± 1.22 | 13.80 ± 0.00 | 22.80 ± 1.09 | 15.50 ± 1.45 | 27.56 ± 2.50 |
| 5 | 76.34 ± 1.62 | 13.90 ± 2.80 | 25.90 ± 1.34 | 20.22 ± 0.00 | 30.14 ± 1.66 |
| 7 | 83.95 ± 2.10 | 13.90 ± 1.06 | 35.12 ± 0.55 | 26.75 ± 2.42 | 30.14 ± 2.34 |
| 10 | 95.99 ± 1.52 | 16.20 ± 1.90 | 37.00 ± 1.50 | 31.01 ± 1.14 | 33.50 ± 1.08 |
| 20 | 96.00 ± 2.20 | 24.00 ± 0.00 | 40.90 ± 1.75 | 31.81 ± 2.22 | 37.14 ± 0.00 |
| 30 | 97.50 ± 1.44 | 24.80 ± 1.85 | 44.00 ± 2.21 | 38.20 ± 1.85 | 40.90 ± 1.99 |
| 40 | 97.50 ± 1.82 | 38.00 ± 2.52 | 48.50 ± 0.00 | 38.20 ± 2.12 | 43.56 ± 0.85 |
| 50 | 98.10 ± 2.50 | 78.10 ± 0.75 | 55.00 ± 0.57 | 55.00 ± 1.23 | 44.80 ± 0.57 |
| 80 | 98.66 ± 2.25 | 64.30 ± 1.34 | 56.30 ± 0.00 | 58.12 ± 0.57 | |
| 1.90 ± 1.59 | 39.80 ± 1.60 | 31.60 ± 1.09 | 63.10 ± 1.42 | 61.70 ± 1.23 | |
Values are means ± SD of three experiments carried out in triplicates.
IC50 were calculated by using Bio Data Fit edition 1.02.
Maximum DPPH inhibitory effect.
In vitro antibacterial activity of EOs of O. syriacum leaves, collected from Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Qalqilya and Tulkarem regions.
| Bacterial isolate | MIC (µg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerusalem | Bethlehem | Qalqilya | Tulkarem | |
| 97 | 930 | 390 | 390 | |
| MRSA | 6250 | 780 | 780 | 390 |
| 97 | 190 | 780 | 780 | |
| >25,000 | 1560 | 3130 | ≥25,000 | |
| ≥25,000 | 3130 | 3130 | 6250 | |
Values are means for three experiments carried out in triplicates.
Fig. 2In vitro antioxidant capacity of Trolox (standard) and the four O. syriacum EOs values shown represent the means ± SD for three experiments carried out in triplicates.