| Literature DB >> 35805807 |
Federico Floreani1,2, Alessandro Acquavita3, Nicolò Barago1, Katja Klun4, Jadran Faganeli4, Stefano Covelli1.
Abstract
Gaseous exchanges of mercury (Hg) at the water-air interface in contaminated sites strongly influence its fate in the environment. In this study, diurnal gaseous Hg exchanges were seasonally evaluated by means of a floating flux chamber in two freshwater environments impacted by anthropogenic sources of Hg, specifically historical mining activity (Solkan Reservoir, Slovenia) and the chlor-alkali industry (Torviscosa dockyard, Italy), and in a pristine site, Cavazzo Lake (Italy). The highest fluxes (21.88 ± 11.55 ng m-2 h-1) were observed at Solkan, coupled with high dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) and dissolved Hg (THgD) concentrations. Conversely, low vertical mixing and saltwater intrusion at Torviscosa limited Hg mobility through the water column, with higher Hg concentrations in the deep layer near the contaminated sediments. Consequently, both DGM and THgD in surface water were generally lower at Torviscosa than at Solkan, resulting in lower fluxes (19.01 ± 12.65 ng m-2 h-1). However, at this site, evasion may also be limited by high atmospheric Hg levels related to dispersion of emissions from the nearby chlor-alkali plant. Surprisingly, comparable fluxes (15.56 ± 12.78 ng m-2 h-1) and Hg levels in water were observed at Cavazzo, suggesting a previously unidentified Hg input (atmospheric depositions or local geology). Overall, at all sites the fluxes were higher in the summer and correlated to incident UV radiation and water temperature due to enhanced photo production and diffusivity of DGM, the concentrations of which roughly followed the same seasonal trend.Entities:
Keywords: Idrija mercury mine; chlor-alkali plant; dissolved gaseous mercury; flux chamber; mercury evasion; water-air exchange
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805807 PMCID: PMC9266016 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Study area and selected study sites.
Figure 2Variation in UV radiation, DGM concentration, and gaseous Hg flux during sampling periods in the different selected sites.
Comparison of gaseous Hg fluxes obtained in this study and over various freshwater systems. n.a. = not available, n.s. = not specified.
| Measurement Site | Main Hg Source | Gaseous Hg Flux | Method | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Min–Max | ||||
| Solkan Reservoir (SLO) | Hg mining | 21.88 ± 11.55 | 9.96–46.77 | DFC | This study |
| Torviscosa dockyard (ITA) | CAP discharge | 19.01 ± 12.65 | 6.21–52.71 | DFC | This study |
| Lake of Cavazzo (ITA) | Unknown | 15.56 ± 12.78 | 0–37.59 | DFC | This study |
| Baihua Reservoir (CHI) | Organic chemical plant | 7.6 ± 2.1 | 0–50.5 | DFC | [ |
| Hongfeng Reservoir (CHI) | Atmospheric depositions | 5.4 ± 2.3 | 0.002–36.1 | DFC | [ |
| Wujiangdu Reservoir (CHI) | Wastewater discharge | - | −11.2–67.2 | DFC | [ |
| Suofengying Reservoir (CHI) | Wastewater discharge | - | −6.7–23.9 | DFC | [ |
| Big Dam West (CAN) | Atmospheric depositions | 5.4 ± n.a. | 0.8–43.8 | DFC | [ |
| North Cranberry (CAN) | Atmospheric depositions | 1.1 ± n.a. | −2.0–13.5 | DFC | [ |
| Lake Lacawac (USA) | Atmospheric depositions | - | 0.14–20.95 | DFC | [ |
| Puzzle Lake (CAN) | Atmospheric depositions | 3.8 ± 2.6 | −4.55–9.00 | DFC | [ |
| Lake Velenje (SLO) | Atmospheric depositions | 5.9 ± n.a. | 5.3–6.6 | DFC | [ |
| Lake Ontario (CAN-USA) | n.s. | - | 0–9.07 | MM | [ |
| Lake Michigan (USA) | n.s. | - | 0.6–1.6 | MM | [ |
| Cane Creek Lake (USA) | n.s. | - | 0.6–1.2 | DFC | [ |
| Arbutus Lake (USA) | n.s. | 1.6 ± 0.7 | - | MM | [ |
| Swedish River (SWE) | (Remote area) | 11 ± n.a. | −2.5–88.9 | DFC | [ |
| Lake Gardsjon (SWE) | n.s. | 8.5 ± 6.5 | - | DFC | [ |
| Florida Everglades (USA) | n.s. | 1.2 ± 4.9 | - | DFC | [ |
Figure 3Average diurnal values over the various seasons and selected sampling sites of (a) gaseous Hg fluxes, (b) DGM concentrations.
Figure 4Correlation between DGM concentrations and gaseous Hg fluxes for the selected sampling sites. Kendall’s rank correlation coefficients (τ) and 95% confidence intervals are reported.
Figure 5Correlation between water temperature and gaseous Hg fluxes for the selected sampling sites. Kendall’s rank correlation coefficients (τ) and 95% confidence intervals are reported.