Literature DB >> 26420634

Photoreduction of Hg(ii) and photodemethylation of methylmercury: the key role of thiol sites on dissolved organic matter.

Jeffrey D Jeremiason1, Joshua C Portner1, George R Aiken2, Amber J Hiranaka3, Michelle T Dvorak3, Khuyen T Tran3, Douglas E Latch3.   

Abstract

This study examined the kinetics of photoreduction of Hg(ii) and photodemethylation of methylmercury (MeHg(+)) attached to, or in the presence of, dissolved organic matter (DOM). Both Hg(ii) and MeHg(+) are principally bound to reduced sulfur groups associated with DOM in many freshwater systems. We propose that a direct photolysis mechanism is plausible for reduction of Hg(ii) bound to reduced sulfur groups on DOM while an indirect mechanism is supported for photodemethylation of MeHg(+) bound to DOM. UV spectra of Hg(ii) and MeHg(+) bound to thiol containing molecules demonstrate that the Hg(ii)-S bond is capable of absorbing UV-light in the solar spectrum to a much greater extent than MeHg(+)-S bonds. Experiments with chemically distinct DOM isolates suggest that concentration of DOM matters little in the photochemistry if there are enough reduced S sites present to strongly bind MeHg(+) and Hg(ii); DOM concentration does not play a prominent role in photodemethylation other than to screen light, which was demonstrated in a field experiment in the highly colored St. Louis River where photodemethylation was not observed at depths ≥ 10 cm. Experiments with thiol ligands yielded slower photodegradation rates for MeHg(+) than in experiments with DOM and thiols; rates in the presence of DOM alone were the fastest supporting an intra-DOM mechanism. Hg(ii) photoreduction rates, however, were similar in experiments with only DOM, thiols plus DOM, or only thiols suggesting a direct photolysis mechanism. Quenching experiments also support the existence of an intra-DOM photodemethylation mechanism for MeHg(+). Utilizing the difference in photodemethylation rates measured for MeHg(+) attached to DOM or thiol ligands, the binding constant for MeHg(+) attached to thiol groups on DOM was estimated to be 10(16.7).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26420634     DOI: 10.1039/c5em00305a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  5 in total

1.  Factors controlling the photochemical degradation of methylmercury in coastal and oceanic waters.

Authors:  Brian P DiMento; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Mar Chem       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.807

2.  Development of a Novel Equilibrium Passive Sampling Device for Methylmercury in Sediment and Soil Porewaters.

Authors:  James P Sanders; Alyssa McBurney; Cynthia C Gilmour; Grace E Schwartz; Spencer Washburn; Susan B Kane Driscoll; Steven S Brown; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 3.  A survey of photogeochemistry.

Authors:  Timothy A Doane
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.737

4.  Gaseous Mercury Exchange from Water-Air Interface in Differently Impacted Freshwater Environments.

Authors:  Federico Floreani; Alessandro Acquavita; Nicolò Barago; Katja Klun; Jadran Faganeli; Stefano Covelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Methylmercury Production and Degradation under Light and Dark Conditions in the Water Column of the Hells Canyon Reservoirs, USA.

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Todd P Luxton; Christopher D Knightes; Vishal Shah
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.218

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.