| Literature DB >> 35801089 |
Yiming Zhang1,2, Mo Su1, Zheng Wang1, Jens Nielsen1,3,4, Zihe Liu1.
Abstract
The respiro-fermentative metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, also called the Crabtree effect, results in lower energy efficiency and biomass yield which can impact yields of chemicals to be produced using this cell factory. Although it can be engineered to become Crabtree negative, the slow growth and glucose consumption rate limit its industrial application. Here the Crabtree effect in yeast can be alleviated by engineering the transcription factor Mth1 involved in glucose signaling and a subunit of the RNA polymerase II mediator complex Med2. It was found that the mutant with the MTH1 A81D&MED2*432Y allele could grow in glucose rich medium with a specific growth rate of 0.30 h-1, an ethanol yield of 0.10 g g-1, and a biomass yield of 0.21 g g-1, compared with a specific growth rate of 0.40 h-1, an ethanol yield of 0.46 g g-1, and a biomass yield of 0.11 g g-1 in the wild-type strain CEN.PK 113-5D. Transcriptome analysis revealed significant downregulation of the glycolytic process, as well as the upregulation of the TCA cycle and the electron transfer chain. Significant expression changes of several reporter transcription factors were also identified, which might explain the higher energy efficiencies in the engineered strain. We further demonstrated the potential of the engineered strain with the production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid at a titer of 2.04 g L-1, i.e., 5.4-fold higher than that of a reference strain, indicating that the alleviated glucose repression could enhance the supply of mitochondrial acetyl-CoA. These results suggested that the engineered strain could be used as an efficient cell factory for mitochondrial production of acetyl-CoA derived chemicals.Entities:
Keywords: 3-Hydroxypropionic acid; Crabtree effect; Respiro-fermentation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Year: 2022 PMID: 35801089 PMCID: PMC9241035 DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.06.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Synth Syst Biotechnol ISSN: 2405-805X
Plasmids and strains used and constructed in this study.
| Plasmid/Strain | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| pCas | [ | |
| pScURA | [ | |
| pCas9_M226 | pCas, | This study |
| pCas9_M226s | pCas, | This study |
| pCas9_MED2 | pCas, | This study |
| pCas9_MED2_N | pCas, | This study |
| pCas9_MTH1p | pCas, | This study |
| pUGG1 | [ | |
| pYC1 | [ | |
| pMCR1 | pUGG1, | This study |
| pMCR2 | pUGG1, | This study |
| CEN.PK 113-5D | [ | |
| ZS_mth1 | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| ZS_mth1_2 | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| ZS_mth1_3 | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| ZS_mth1_4 | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| ZS_med2 | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| ZS_mm | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| MTH1_HXT1p | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| mth1_ HXT1p | ZS_mth1, | This study |
| MTH1_PGK1p | CEN.PK 113-5D, | This study |
| mth1_PGK1p | ZS_mth1, | This study |
| 5D_pMCR1 | CEN.PK 113-5D, pMCR1 | This study |
| 5D_3HP | CEN.PK 113-5D, pMCR2 | This study |
| mm_3HP | ZS_mm, pMCR2 | This study |
Fig. 1Growth, glucose and ethanol profiles of the wild-type strain (A) and the mutants with MTH1A81D (B), MED2*432Y (C) and MTH1A81D&MED2*432Y (D), respectively. The cultivations were performed in minimal medium with 2% glucose in bioreactors in duplicate and error bars represent ±standard errors.
Physiological parameters of the wild-type strain (WT) and the mutants with MED2*432Y (ZS_med2), MTH1A81D (ZS_mth1), and MTH1A81D&MED2*432Y (ZS_mm), respectively. The cultivations were performed in minimal medium with 2% glucose in bioreactors in replicate. Error bars represent ±standard errors.
| μmax | YSX | qGlu | YGluEth | qEth | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h−1 | gDCW gGlc−1 | g L−1 gDCW−1 h−1 | gEth gGlc−1 | g L−1 gDCW−1 h−1 | ||||||
| WT | 0.40 | ±0.01 | 0.11 | ±0.02 | 3.32 | ±0.01 | 0.46 | ±0.01 | 1.52 | ±0.04 |
| ZS_med2 | 0.42 | ±0.01 | 0.14 | ±0.00 | 3.13 | ±0.10 | 0.45 | ±0.01 | 1.39 | ±0.08 |
| ZS_mth1 | 0.21 | ±0.00 | 0.15 | ±0.01 | 1.46 | ±0.08 | 0.13 | ±0.03 | 0.18 | ±0.03 |
| ZS_mm | 0.30 | ±0.01 | 0.21 | ±0.01 | 1.47 | ±0.07 | 0.10 | ±0.01 | 0.15 | ±0.01 |
Fig. 2Transcriptional analysis of the mutant strains. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of the transcription data in triplicates. (B) Venn diagram of significantly regulated genes of mutant strains in comparison with the WT strain (p-adj < 0.01). (C) Gene set enrichment analysis of the 245 commonly regulated genes. Fold enrichment indicated the magnitude of enrichment against the genome background of the strain S288C analyzed via DAVID. (D) Venn diagram of highly scored (p-value<0.01) reporter GO terms through analyzing significantly regulated genes of the mutants compared with the WT strain (p-adj < 0.05). (E) The common high scored reporter GO terms in distinct-directional up and down class presented by their significance in the mutants. (F) The high scored reporter transcription factors (TFs) in distinct-directional up and down class presented by their significance. (G) Expression levels of reporter TFs in the mutant strains compared with the wildtype strain.
Fig. 3Transcriptional representation of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism. All data was made in comparisons with the WT strain.
Fig. 4Effects of MTH1 and MED2 mutations on cell respiration. (A) Expression fold changes of the genes involved in mitochondrial electron transport chains. All data were made in comparisons with WT strain. (B) Oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) of the wild-type strain (WT) and mutant strains under two different glucose levels using a Seahorse XF96 analyzer. The measurements were performed in replicate and error bars represent ±standard errors.
Fig. 5The growth, glucose and ethanol profiles of the wild-type strain (A) and the mutants ZS_mth1(B), ZS_med2 (C) and ZS_mm (D) with (red line) and without (black line) mitochondrial pyruvate transporter inhibitor UK-5099. The cultivations were performed in minimal medium with 2% glucose in shake flasks in triplicate and error bars represent ±standard errors.
Fig. 6The growth, glucose, ethanol and 3-HP profiles of the strains without (A) and with (B) the mutations of MTH1A81D&MED2*432Y. The cultivations were performed in minimal medium with 2% glucose in shake flasks in triplicate and error bars represent ±standard errors.