Literature DB >> 35799043

The early attentional pancake: Minimal selection in depth for rapid attentional cueing.

Ryan E O'Donnell1, Kyrie H Murawski2, Ella Herrmann3, Jesse Wisch4, Garrett D Sullivan3, Brad Wyble3.   

Abstract

There have been conflicting findings on the degree to which rapidly deployed visual attention is selective for depth, and this issue has important implications for attention models. Previous findings have attempted to find depth-based cueing effects on such attention using reaction time (RT) measures for stimuli presented in stereo goggles with a display screen. Results stemming from such approaches have been mixed, depending on whether target/distractor discrimination was required. To help clarify the existence of such depth effects, we have developed a paradigm that measures accuracy rather than RT in an immersive virtual-reality environment, providing a more appropriate context of depth. Three modified Posner Cueing paradigms were run to test for depth-specific rapid attentional selectivity. Participants fixated a cross while attempting to identify a rapidly masked black letter preceded by a red cue that could be valid in depth, side, or both. In Experiment 1a, a potent cueing effect was found for lateral cueing validity, but a weak effect was found for depth despite an extreme difference in virtual depth (1 vs. 300 m). In Experiment 1b, a near-replication of 1a, the lateral effect replicated while the depth effect did not. Finally, in Experiment 2, to increase the depth cue's effectiveness, the letter matched the cue's color, and the presentation duration was increased; however, again only a minimal depth-based cueing effect - no greater than that of Experiment 1a - was observed. Thus, we conclude that rapidly deployed attention is driven largely by spatiotopic rather than depth-based information.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular disparity; Depth; Rapid attention; Spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35799043     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02529-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  21 in total

1.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Variation of stereoscopic acuity with observation distance.

Authors:  G AMIGO
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1963-05

3.  Spatial orienting of attention in stereo depth.

Authors:  Dieter Bauer; Axel Plinge; Walter H Ehrenstein; Gerhard Rinkenauer; Marc Grosjean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-26

4.  Perceptual distance and the constancy of size and stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Lloyd Kaufman; James H Kaufman; Richard Noble; Stefan Edlund; Sunhee Bai; Teresa King
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2006

5.  Binocular depth discrimination and estimation beyond interaction space.

Authors:  Robert S Allison; Barbara J Gillam; Elia Vecellio
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Allocation of attention in the visual field.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; Y Y Yeh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of "neutral" cues.

Authors:  L de Gonzaga Gawryszewski; L Riggio; G Rizzolatti; C Umiltá
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Shifting visual attention in stereographic displays: a time course analysis.

Authors:  H P Iavecchia; C L Folk
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Accuracy of absolute visual distance and size estimation in space as a function of stereopsis and motion parallax.

Authors:  J W Dees
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-09

10.  How spatial and feature-based attention affect the gain and tuning of population responses.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Taosheng Liu; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.