Literature DB >> 18590754

How spatial and feature-based attention affect the gain and tuning of population responses.

Sam Ling1, Taosheng Liu, Marisa Carrasco.   

Abstract

How does attention optimize our visual system for the task at hand? Two mechanisms have been proposed for how attention improves signal processing: gain and tuning. To distinguish between these two mechanisms we use the equivalent-noise paradigm, which measures performance as a function of external noise. In the present study we explored how spatial and feature-based attention affect performance by assessing their threshold-vs-noise (TvN) curves with regard to the signature behavioral effects of gain and tuning. Furthermore, we link our psychophysical results to neurophysiology by implementing a simple, biologically-plausible model to show that attention affects the gain and tuning of population responses differentially, depending on the type of attention being deployed: Whereas spatial attention operates by boosting the gain of the population response, feature-based attention operates by both boosting the gain and sharpening the tuning of the population response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18590754      PMCID: PMC2696585          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  46 in total

1.  Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Julio C Martinez-Trujillo; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-13       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Covert attention enhances letter identification without affecting channel tuning.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Denis G Pelli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Tori Williford; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; K H Britten; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST.

Authors:  S Treue; J H Maunsell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  56 in total

1.  Attention improves encoding of task-relevant features in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Janneke F M Jehee; Devin K Brady; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Mindfulness meditation training alters cortical representations of interoceptive attention.

Authors:  Norman A S Farb; Zindel V Segal; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Similar effects of feature-based attention on motion perception and pursuit eye movements at different levels of awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Suppression effects in feature-based attention.

Authors:  Yixue Wang; James Miller; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren E Vucovich; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  Acting without seeing: eye movements reveal visual processing without awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 10.  Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness.

Authors:  Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.