Laura K Certain1, Russell J Benefield2, Michael Newman3, Mingyuan Zhang3, Frank O Thomas4. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 2. Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 3. Data Science Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 4. Value Engineering, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Abstract
Background: Patients discharged from the hospital on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) require close monitoring, including weekly blood tests and an early posthospital follow-up visit. However, because patients often receive OPAT in a separate healthcare system from where they received inpatient care, the OPAT plan often fails, with less than 75% of OPAT patients receiving the recommended laboratory monitoring. We sought to determine whether changing our inpatient OPAT documentation method would improve postdischarge care. Methods: As a quality improvement initiative, we conducted 2 Plan-Do-Study-Act interventions on our OPAT documentation. Our first intervention was to create a standardized OPAT Progress Note, and our second was to turn that note into a SmartForm (Epic) with discrete fields for the key information. We examined the effects of these changes on the rate of completion of recommended laboratory monitoring, attendance at outpatient follow-up visits, and 30-day readmission rates. Results: Changing our documentation to a standardized Progress Note and then to a SmartForm with discrete fields led to an increase in the proportion of patients with a serum creatinine checked within 10 days of discharge (from 63% to 71% to 73%) and who attended an infectious disease clinic visit within 3 weeks of discharge (from 21% to 36% to 47%). However, the rate of readmissions for OPAT-related problems did not change, nor did a composite outcome of 30-day mortality/unplanned readmission. Conclusions: Changes in how and where care plans are documented in the inpatient medical record can have significant effects on patient care outcomes after discharge.
Background: Patients discharged from the hospital on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) require close monitoring, including weekly blood tests and an early posthospital follow-up visit. However, because patients often receive OPAT in a separate healthcare system from where they received inpatient care, the OPAT plan often fails, with less than 75% of OPAT patients receiving the recommended laboratory monitoring. We sought to determine whether changing our inpatient OPAT documentation method would improve postdischarge care. Methods: As a quality improvement initiative, we conducted 2 Plan-Do-Study-Act interventions on our OPAT documentation. Our first intervention was to create a standardized OPAT Progress Note, and our second was to turn that note into a SmartForm (Epic) with discrete fields for the key information. We examined the effects of these changes on the rate of completion of recommended laboratory monitoring, attendance at outpatient follow-up visits, and 30-day readmission rates. Results: Changing our documentation to a standardized Progress Note and then to a SmartForm with discrete fields led to an increase in the proportion of patients with a serum creatinine checked within 10 days of discharge (from 63% to 71% to 73%) and who attended an infectious disease clinic visit within 3 weeks of discharge (from 21% to 36% to 47%). However, the rate of readmissions for OPAT-related problems did not change, nor did a composite outcome of 30-day mortality/unplanned readmission. Conclusions: Changes in how and where care plans are documented in the inpatient medical record can have significant effects on patient care outcomes after discharge.
Authors: Alan D Tice; Susan J Rehm; Joseph R Dalovisio; John S Bradley; Lawrence P Martinelli; Donald R Graham; R Brooks Gainer; Mark J Kunkel; Robert W Yancey; David N Williams Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-05-26 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Laura K Certain; Russell J Benefield; Michael Newman; Mingyuan Zhang; Frank O Thomas Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 4.423
Authors: Barbara J King; Andrea L Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Rachel A Roiland; Brock E Polnaszek; Barbara J Bowers; Amy J H Kind Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sara C Keller; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alejandra Salinas; Deborah Williams; Jennifer Townsend; Sara E Cosgrove Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Daisy Goodman; Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; G Ross Baker; Jane Barnsteiner; Tina C Foster; Kari Gali; Joanne Hilden; Leora Horwitz; Heather C Kaplan; Jerome Leis; John C Matulis; Susan Michie; Rebecca Miltner; Julia Neily; William A Nelson; Matthew Niedner; Brant Oliver; Lori Rutman; Richard Thomson; Johan Thor Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Jennifer Townsend; Sara Keller; Martin Tibuakuu; Sameer Thakker; Bailey Webster; Maya Siegel; Kevin J Psoter; Omar Mansour; Trish M Perl Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Laura K Certain; Russell J Benefield; Michael Newman; Mingyuan Zhang; Frank O Thomas Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 4.423