Literature DB >> 35793388

Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation predicts multi-alternative risky choice behaviour.

Felix Molter1,2,3, Armin W Thomas2,4,5, Scott A Huettel6,7, Hauke R Heekeren2,8, Peter N C Mohr1,2,3.   

Abstract

Choices are influenced by gaze allocation during deliberation, so that fixating an alternative longer leads to increased probability of choosing it. Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation provides a parsimonious account of choices, response times and gaze-behaviour in many simple decision scenarios. Here, we test whether this framework can also predict more complex context-dependent patterns of choice in a three-alternative risky choice task, where choices and eye movements were subject to attraction and compromise effects. Choices were best described by a gaze-dependent evidence accumulation model, where subjective values of alternatives are discounted while not fixated. Finally, we performed a systematic search over a large model space, allowing us to evaluate the relative contribution of different forms of gaze-dependence and additional mechanisms previously not considered by gaze-dependent accumulation models. Gaze-dependence remained the most important mechanism, but participants with strong attraction effects employed an additional similarity-dependent inhibition mechanism found in other models of multi-alternative multi-attribute choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35793388      PMCID: PMC9292127          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.779


  58 in total

1.  Theoretical developments in decision field theory: comment on Tsetsos, Usher, and Chater (2010).

Authors:  Jared M Hotaling; Jerome R Busemeyer; Jiyun Li
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice.

Authors:  R Blythe Towal; Milica Mormann; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attention and choice across domains.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Ian Krajbich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09-24

Review 4.  The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice.

Authors:  Jennifer S Trueblood; Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Competing theories of multialternative, multiattribute preferential choice.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Dan R Schley; Carly Muller; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsetsos; Nick Chater; Marius Usher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Thomas V Wiecki; Angad Kochar; Michael J Frank
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-02-17

8.  Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Dianna R Amasino; Nicolette J Sullivan; Rachel E Kranton; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-02-25

9.  Multialternative decision by sampling: A model of decision making constrained by process data.

Authors:  Takao Noguchi; Neil Stewart
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.

Authors:  Frederick Callaway; Antonio Rangel; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.