Literature DB >> 24548281

Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes.

James F Cavanagh1, Thomas V Wiecki1, Angad Kochar1, Michael J Frank1.   

Abstract

Can you predict what people are going to do just by watching them? This is certainly difficult: it would require a clear mapping between observable indicators and unobservable cognitive states. In this report, we demonstrate how this is possible by monitoring eye gaze and pupil dilation, which predict dissociable biases during decision making. We quantified decision making using the drift diffusion model (DDM), which provides an algorithmic account of how evidence accumulation and response caution contribute to decisions through separate latent parameters of drift rate and decision threshold, respectively. We used a hierarchical Bayesian estimation approach to assess the single trial influence of observable physiological signals on these latent DDM parameters. Increased eye gaze dwell time specifically predicted an increased drift rate toward the fixated option, irrespective of the value of the option. In contrast, greater pupil dilation specifically predicted an increase in decision threshold during difficult decisions. These findings suggest that eye tracking and pupillometry reflect the operations of dissociated latent decision processes. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24548281      PMCID: PMC4114997          DOI: 10.1037/a0035813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  48 in total

1.  Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

2.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Thomas V Wiecki; Michael X Cohen; Christina M Figueroa; Johan Samanta; Scott J Sherman; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Wolfram Schultz; Colin F Camerer; John P O'Doherty; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  On the interpretation of removable interactions: a survey of the field 33 years after Loftus.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Amy H Criss; Geoff Iverson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 6.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution.

Authors:  Stefan M Wierda; Hedderik van Rijn; Niels A Taatgen; Sander Martens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The decision value computations in the vmPFC and striatum use a relative value code that is guided by visual attention.

Authors:  Seung-Lark Lim; John P O'Doherty; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline's Role in Decision Making.

Authors:  Kerstin Preuschoff; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Katherine M Rumsey; Robert C Wilson; Kinjan Parikh; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  68 in total

1.  Irrational time allocation in decision-making.

Authors:  Bastiaan Oud; Ian Krajbich; Kevin Miller; Jin Hyun Cheong; Matthew Botvinick; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Modeling the interaction of numerosity and perceptual variables with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Inhan Kang; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Value-Based Choice, Contingency Learning, and Suicidal Behavior in Mid- and Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Michael N Hallquist; Vanessa M Brown; Jonathan Wilson; Katalin Szanto
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

6.  fMRI and EEG predictors of dynamic decision parameters during human reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Michael J Frank; Chris Gagne; Erika Nyhus; Sean Masters; Thomas V Wiecki; James F Cavanagh; David Badre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Taming the beast: extracting generalizable knowledge from computational models of cognition.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10

8.  The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Mads Lund Pedersen; Michael J Frank; Guido Biele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 9.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value.

Authors:  Pradyumna Sepulveda; Marius Usher; Ned Davies; Amy A Benson; Pietro Ortoleva; Benedetto De Martino
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.