Literature DB >> 30247061

Attention and choice across domains.

Stephanie M Smith1, Ian Krajbich1.   

Abstract

When people are faced with a decision, they tend to choose the option that draws their attention. In recent years, correlations between attention and choice have been documented in a variety of domains. This leads to the question of whether there is a general, stable relationship between attention and choice. Here, we examined choice behavior in tasks with and without risk and social considerations, using food or monetary rewards, within a single experiment. This allowed us to test the consistency of the decision-making process across domains. In the aggregate, we identified remarkable consistency in the attention-choice link. At the individual level, subjects with strong attentional effects in one task were likely to have strong attentional effects in the others. The strength of these effects also correlated with individuals' degree of tunnel vision. Thus, the attention-choice relationship appears to be a stable individual trait that is linked to more general attentional constraints. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30247061     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  12 in total

1.  Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.

Authors:  Anthony I Jang; Ravi Sharma; Jan Drugowitsch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation predicts multi-alternative risky choice behaviour.

Authors:  Felix Molter; Armin W Thomas; Scott A Huettel; Hauke R Heekeren; Peter N C Mohr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Yenti Pavri; Jenny Le; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  Attentional mechanisms drive systematic exploration in young children.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Blanco; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-05-25

5.  The formation of preference in risky choice.

Authors:  Moshe Glickman; Orian Sharoni; Dino J Levy; Ernst Niebur; Veit Stuphorn; Marius Usher
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  GLAMbox: A Python toolbox for investigating the association between gaze allocation and decision behaviour.

Authors:  Felix Molter; Armin W Thomas; Hauke R Heekeren; Peter N C Mohr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.

Authors:  Frederick Callaway; Antonio Rangel; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A causal role for the right frontal eye fields in value comparison.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Andres Mitsumasu; Christian C Ruff; Ernst Fehr; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Systematic exploration and uncertainty dominate young children's choices.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Blanco; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-08-24

10.  The gaze bias effect in toddlers: Preliminary evidence for the developmental study of visual decision-making.

Authors:  Toshiki Saito; Ryunosuke Sudo; Yuji Takano
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.