| Literature DB >> 35790929 |
Qi Tian1, Cong Peng1, Kai Liu1, Haopeng Luan1, Xiaokang Liu1, Linhao Na1, Shicong Cao1, Zheng Tian2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis is a relatively rare site of tuberculosis infection, but it can lead to severe sacroiliac joint destruction and dysfunction. Since there are few studies on the surgical methods of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis (SJT), we adopted three different surgical methods based on different degrees of destruction of sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis. While revealing its clinical symptoms to improve the diagnostic accuracy, and to determine the safety and feasibility of this surgical approach in the treatment of sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior approach; Joint fusion; Joint tuberculosis; Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35790929 PMCID: PMC9254578 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05600-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Patient’s basic information
| value | Gender | Age | Infected Side | other infected sites | abscessus | Kim’s Type | Treatment of surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 28 | L | No | N | III | A |
| 2 | M | 25 | R | No | Y | IV | A |
| 3 | M | 25 | L | No | Y | IV | C |
| 4 | F | 17 | L | No | Y | IV | B |
| 5 | F | 21 | R | No | Y | IV | A |
| 6 | F | 20 | R | No | Y | IV | C |
| 7 | F | 16 | L | No | Y | IV | A |
| 8 | M | 19 | L | No | Y | IV | C |
| 9 | M | 15 | R | No | Y | IV | C |
| 10 | F | 32 | L | No | Y | IV | A |
| 11 | F | 13 | R | No | Y | IV | C |
| 12 | F | 26 | R | Kidney | Y | IV | A |
| 13 | M | 23 | R | No | Y | IV | B |
| 14 | M | 16 | L | No | N | III | A |
| 15 | F | 36 | R | No | Y | IV | B |
| 16 | F | 69 | R | Urinary system | Y | IV | C |
| 17 | M | 34 | R | No | Y | IV | B |
Fig. 1Preoperative X-ray, CT and MRI of the patient, as well as X-ray at 3 months, 6 months after operation and CT at 12 months after operation of NO.4. a-d Preoperative X-rays, CT and MRI: the right sacroiliac joint space is indistinct and part of the bone is destroyed; the left iliac muscle and the front of the hip joint can be seen with irregular and mixed density soft tissue shadows; the psoas major muscle can be seen with patchy slightly Long T2 signal. e X-ray at 3 months after operation: it can be seen that the bone graft is not fused with the joint. f X-ray at 6 months after operation shows the fusion of the bone graft and the joint. g-h There is no bone resorption in the bone graft part, and the joint part is fused in the CT at 12 months after operation
Fig. 2Preoperative CT, X-ray at 3 months after operation, X-ray at 6 months after operation, and CT at 12 months after operation of NO.6. a The right sacroiliac joint space is widened, the articular surface is not smooth and tidy, the band-like bone density is increased, and the articular surface of the iliac flank is destroyed by insects. b The implanted autologous ilium did not see obvious bone resorption occurred 3 months after surgery. c Part of the bone in the operation area can be seen fused 6 months after the operation, and the bone density in the operation area is not uniform. d-h Three-dimensional reconstruction imaging of the sacroiliac joint showed that a relatively stable arthrodesis had been achieved 12 months postoperatively
Results of 17 patients
| outcome | Surgical management ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | 361.8 ± 630.2 | ||
| Intraoperative blood transfusion (case) | 4 | ||
| operation time (min) | 105.6 ± 39.8 | ||
| ESR | Preoperative | 7 days after surgery | 3 months after surgery |
| 58.6 ± 13.7 | 38.7 ± 8.8 | 10.4 ± 6.1 | |
The normal reference value of ESR in our hospital: < 15 mm/h (male), < 20 mm/h (female)
VAS and ODI results of 16 patients
| outcome | VAS and ODI( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAS | Preoperative | 3 months after surgery | 6 months after surgery | 12 months after surgery |
| 6.6 ± 1.5 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | |
| ODI | 56.1 ± 4.2 | 39 ± 4.8 | 27.6 ± 5.7 | 4.3 ± 1.6 |