Literature DB >> 32123652

Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Anatomy, Function, Biomechanics, Sexual Dimorphism, and Causes of Pain.

Ali Kiapour1,2, Amin Joukar1, Hossein Elgafy1, Deniz U Erbulut1, Anand K Agarwal1, Vijay K Goel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sacroiliac joints (SIJs), the largest axial joints in the body, sit in between the sacrum and pelvic bones on either side. They connect the spine to the pelvis and thus facilitate load transfer from the lumbar spine to the lower extremities. The majority of low back pain (LBP) is perceived to originate from the lumbar spine; however, another likely source of LBP that is mostly overlooked is the SIJ. This study (Parts I and II) aims to evaluate the clinical and biomechanical literature to understand the anatomy, biomechanics, sexual dimorphism, and causes and mechanics of pain of the SIJ leading to conservative and surgical treatment options using instrumentation. Part II concludes with the mechanics of the devices used in minimal surgical procedures for the SIJ.
METHODS: A thorough review of the literature was performed to analyze studies related to normal SIJ mechanics, as well as the effects of sex and pain on SIJ mechanics.
RESULTS: A total of 65 studies were selected related to anatomy, biomechanical function of the SIJ, and structures that surround the joints. These studies discussed the effects of various parameters, gender, and existence of common physiological disorders on the biomechanics of the SIJ.
CONCLUSIONS: The SIJ lies between the sacrum and the ilium and connects the spine to the pelvic bones. The SIJ transfers large bending moments and compression loads to lower extremities. However, the joint does not have as much stability of its own against the shear loads but resists shear due the tight wedging of the sacrum between hip bones on either side and the band of ligaments spanning the sacrum and the hip bones. Due to these, sacrum does not exhibit much motion with respect to the ilium. The SIJ range of motion in flexion-extension is about 3°, followed by axial rotation (about 1.5°), and lateral bending (about 0.8°). The sacrum of the female pelvis is wider, more uneven, less curved, and more backward tilted, compared to the male sacrum. Moreover, women exhibit higher mobility, stresses/loads, and pelvis ligament strains compared to male SIJs. Sacroiliac pain can be due to, but not limited to, hypo- or hypermobility, extraneous compression or shearing forces, micro- or macro-fractures, soft tissue injury, inflammation, pregnancy, adjacent segment disease, leg length discrepancy, and prior lumbar fusion. These effects are well discussed in this review. This review leads to Part II, in which the literature on mechanics of the treatment options is reviewed and synthesized. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; biomechanics; causes of pain; sacroiliac joint; sexual dimorphism; surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32123652      PMCID: PMC7041664          DOI: 10.14444/6077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  54 in total

1.  A radiostereometric analysis of movements of the sacroiliac joints during the standing hip flexion test.

Authors:  B Sturesson; A Uden; A Vleeming
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Relationship between limb length discrepancy and load distribution across the sacroiliac joint--a finite element study.

Authors:  Ali Kiapour; Amr A Abdelgawad; Vijay K Goel; Adham Souccar; Tomoya Terai; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Biomechanical testing of a concept of posterior pelvic reconstruction in rotationally and vertically unstable fractures.

Authors:  O Berber; A A Amis; A C Day
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

4.  Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs Part 1: Biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise.

Authors:  C J Snijders; A Vleeming; R Stoeckart
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Experimental study of the sacroiliac joint micromotion in pelvic disruption.

Authors:  Franck H Dujardin; Xavier Roussignol; Mickael Hossenbaccus; Jean M Thomine
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Percutaneous computed tomographic stabilization of the pathologic sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Nabil A Ebraheim; Ashok Biyani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.

Authors:  Alexander A Ivanov; Ali Kiapour; Nabil A Ebraheim; Vijay Goel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Matthew Robbins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Exercise-related stress reaction of the sacroiliac joint. An unusual cause of low back pain in athletes.

Authors:  J V Marymont; M A Lynch; C E Henning
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Ligamentous contributions to pelvic stability.

Authors:  M Vrahas; T C Hern; D Diangelo; J Kellam; M Tile
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  16 in total

1.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mayank Aranke; Grace McCrudy; Kelsey Rooney; Kunaal Patel; Christopher A Lee; Jamal Hasoon; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Distribution of Acute and Chronic Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Churong Lin; Dong Liu; Budian Liu; Jieruo Gu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 4.  Successful Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  Patrick Buchanan; Shashank Vodapally; David W Lee; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Christopher Bovinet; Natalie Strand; Dawood Sayed; Timothy Deer
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Change in Pelvic Incidence Associated With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Case Report.

Authors:  Eric Chun Pu Chu; Arnold Yu Lok Wong
Journal:  J Med Cases       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur.

Authors:  Guo-Liang Lu; Song-Jun Li; Wen-Xue Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

7.  A Tribological Comparison of Facet Joint, Sacroiliac Joint, and Knee Cartilage in the Yucatan Minipig.

Authors:  Rachel C Nordberg; M Gabriela Espinosa; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  The Five Diaphragms in Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine: Myofascial Relationships, Part 1.

Authors:  Bruno Bordoni
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-23

9.  Impact of age, sex, and joint form on degenerative lesions of the sacroiliac joints on CT in the normal population.

Authors:  Katharina Ziegeler; Virginie Kreutzinger; Torsten Diekhoff; Robert Roehle; Denis Poddubnyy; Matthias Pumberger; Bernd Hamm; Kay Geert A Hermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Anatomical Joint Form Variation in Sacroiliac Joint Disease: Current Concepts and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Katharina Ziegeler; Kay Geert A Hermann; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.