Literature DB >> 29932359

Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: an anterior approach and clinical outcomes with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Eiichi Murakami1, Daisuke Kurosawa1, Toshimi Aizawa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The authors evaluated the outcomes of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthrodesis via an original anterior approach to the upper anterior surface of the SIJ in patients with a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. METHODS The authors performed anterior SIJ arthrodesis in 45 patients between 2001 and 2015. Of these patients, 27 (11 men and 16 women; mean age at surgery 49 [24-86] years) were followed up for a minimum of 5 years (average 113 months, range 61-157 months). In the 14 patients in the earlier period of this study, the authors used an anterior approach to expose the SIJ by separating the iliac muscle from the iliac bone and performed internal fixation. In the 13 patients later in the study, the authors changed to a pararectal approach, which involved an incision along the lateral border of the rectus abdominal muscle. Then, extraperitoneally, the upper anterior surface of the SIJ was exposed between the psoas major muscle and the iliac muscle. RESULTS Among the 27 patients, 21 had unilateral anterior arthrodesis alone, 4 required additional posterior arthrodesis, and 2 required pelvic ring arthrodesis because of later pain on the opposite side. In the 21 patients with a unilateral anterior arthrodesis, outcome according to the modified Macnab criteria was excellent in 7, good in 11, and fair in 3. Outcomes were excellent, good, fair, and poor in 1 patient each among the 4 with additional posterior fusion. Outcomes were good and poor for 1 patient each among those with pelvic ring arthrodesis. All 27 patients demonstrated bone union of the SIJ on CT. Lateral femoral cutaneous neuralgia developed in 7 of the 27 patients; 6 patients had undergone the initial anterior method and 1 the later method. CONCLUSIONS Anterior SIJ arthrodesis was effective in most patients with severe SIJ pain resistant to conservative therapy. This approach has the advantage of direct curettage and bone graft into the wide area of the SIJ, which result in good bone union. In particular, the authors' current pararectal approach could decrease the potential risk of lateral cutaneous injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RDQ = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; ROM = range of motion; SIJ = sacroiliac joint; VAS = visual analog scale; anterior approach; arthrodesis; clinical outcome; sacral; sacroiliac joint; surgical technique

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29932359     DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  9 in total

1.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aazad Abbas; Jin Tong Du; Jay Toor; Anne Versteeg; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 3.  Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mayank Aranke; Grace McCrudy; Kelsey Rooney; Kunaal Patel; Christopher A Lee; Jamal Hasoon; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry-based investigation on subchondral bone plate alterations in sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Authors:  A Poilliot; T Doyle; D Kurosawa; M Toranelli; M Zhang; J Zwirner; M Müller-Gerbl; N Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Three-Year Clinical Outcomes after Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Using Triangular Implants in Japan: A Pilot Study of Five Cases.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Hiroaki Koga; Hiroshi Ozawa
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-11

6.  Clinical features and surgical management of tuberculous arthritis of the sacroiliac joint: a retrospective analysis of 33 patients.

Authors:  Qi Tian; Linhao Na; Shicong Cao; Zheng Tian; Zheng Guo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.030

7.  Efficacy analysis of anterior debridement and bone graft fusion in the treatment of sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis: a retrospective analysis of 17 patients.

Authors:  Qi Tian; Cong Peng; Kai Liu; Haopeng Luan; Xiaokang Liu; Linhao Na; Shicong Cao; Zheng Tian
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Surgical Outcomes of Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain: An Analysis of Patients with Poor Results Regarding Activities of Daily Living.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Toshimi Aizawa; Takashi Watanabe
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-21

9.  Pitfalls during Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis for Patients with Severe Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Report of Three Cases with Sacral Dysmorphism Induced by Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae.

Authors:  Daisuke Kurosawa; Eiichi Murakami; Toshimi Aizawa; Takashi Watanabe; Hiroshi Ozawa
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2019
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.