Literature DB >> 12383365

Spinal cord mapping as an adjunct for resection of intramedullary tumors: surgical technique with case illustrations.

Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa1, Mittul Gulati, Russell Lyon, Nalin Gupta, Charles Yingling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors may result in transient or permanent neurological deficits. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials are commonly used to limit complications. We used both antidromically elicited SSEPs for planning the myelotomy site and direct mapping of spinal cord tracts during tumor resection to reduce the risk of neurological deficits and increase the extent of tumor resection.
METHODS: In two patients, 3 and 12 years of age, with tumors of the thoracic and cervical spinal cord, respectively, antidromically elicited SSEPs were evoked by stimulation of the dorsal columns and were recorded with subdermal electrodes placed at the medial malleoli bilaterally. Intramedullary spinal cord mapping was performed by stimulating the resection cavity with a handheld Ojemann stimulator (Radionics, Burlington, MA). In addition to visual observation, subdermal needle electrodes inserted into the abductor pollicis brevis-flexor digiti minimi manus, tibialis anterior-gastrocnemius, and abductor halluces-abductor digiti minimi pedis muscles bilaterally recorded responses that identified motor pathways.
RESULTS: The midline of the spinal cord was anatomically identified by visualizing branches of the dorsal medullary vein penetrating the median sulcus. Antidromic responses were obtained by stimulation at 1-mm intervals on either side of the midline, and the region where no response was elicited was selected for the myelotomy. The anatomic and electrical midlines did not precisely overlap. Stimulation of abnormal tissue within the tumor did not elicit electromyographic activity. Approaching the periphery of the tumor, stimulation at 1 mA elicited an electromyographic response before normal spinal cord was visualized. Restimulation at lower currents by use of 0.25-mA increments identified the descending motor tracts adjacent to the tumor. After tumor resection, the tracts were restimulated to confirm functional integrity. Both patients were discharged within 2 weeks of surgery with minimal neurological deficits.
CONCLUSION: Antidromically elicited SSEPs were important in determining the midline of a distorted cord for placement of the myelotomy incision. Mapping spinal cord motor tracts with direct spinal cord stimulation and electromyographic recording facilitated the extent of surgical resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12383365     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200211000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative applications of the H-reflex and F-response: a tutorial.

Authors:  Ronald E Leppanen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Paolo Manganotti; Stefan Grossauer; Vincenzo Tramontanto; Carlo Mazza; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Use of intra-operative stimulation of brainstem lesion target sites for frameless stereotactic biopsies.

Authors:  Jason Labuschagne; Denis Mutyaba; Jacques Nel; Claudia Casieri
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Surgical management of medulla oblongata hemangioblastomas in one institution: an analysis of 62 cases.

Authors:  Xuesong Liu; Yuekang Zhang; Xuhui Hui; Chao You; Fang Yuan; Wenjing Chen; Si Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 5.  Adult primary intradural spinal cord tumors: a review.

Authors:  Marc C Chamberlain; Trent L Tredway
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 6.  Transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials for cervical spine intraoperative monitoring complications: systematic review and illustrative case of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Francisco Revilla-Pacheco; Shoko Watanabe; Joel Rodríguez-Reyes; Claudia Sánchez-Torres; Paul Shkurovich-Bialik; Tenoch Herrada-Pineda; Pamela Rodríguez-Salgado; Juvenal Franco-Granillo; Martín Calderón-Juárez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Localization of macroscopically undetectable intramedullary hematoma by intraoperative epidural motor evoked potential.

Authors:  Zoltán Horváth; Melinda Lukács; László Szívos; Pál Barzó
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-04-22

8.  Outcomes of malignant CNS ependymomas: an examination of 2408 cases through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2005).

Authors:  Dayron Rodríguez; Michael C Cheung; Nadine Housri; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Kevin Camphausen; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  [Spinal intramedullary tumors. When is surgical treatment indicated?].

Authors:  G Antoniadis; M Engelhardt; W Börm; H-P Richter; S A Rath
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.214

10.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.