Literature DB >> 26998809

Bone thickness of the anterior palate for orthodontic miniscrews.

Maike Holm1, Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann2, James Mah3, Axel Bumann4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the bone thickness in the anterior palate and to test whether there is any dependency between bone thickness and patient's age or gender and whether there is any difference between left and right sides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) evaluations (n  =  431; 229 females, 202 males) of healthy orthodontic patients aged 9-30 years were selected from the database of the imaging center network Mesantis. In each CBCT image, palatal bone thickness was determined as the median and 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm paramedian bilaterally. Bone height was measured perpendicularly to the bony surface at 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 mm from the cementoenamel junction of the maxillary central incisor in the sagittal plane.
RESULTS: The greatest bone thickness was found in the lateral anterior palate. Palatal bone thickness of male patients was on average 1.2 mm greater than that of females. Bone height of 9-13-year-olds was less than that of older patients. No difference could be determined between the left and right side.
CONCLUSIONS: The lateral anterior palate offers the greatest bone thickness. Because there is considerable variation of bone thickness between individuals, a CBCT evaluation is recommended if maximum screw length is to be used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anchorage; Bone thickness; CBCT; Mini-implant; Miniscrew; Palate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26998809     DOI: 10.2319/091515-622.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Erdal Bozkaya; Tuba Tortop; Sema Yüksel; Emine Kaygısız
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness and Its Relationship with Palatal Vault Depth for Mini-Implant Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images.

Authors:  Gholinia Faegheh; Negar Khosravifard; Dina Maleki; Sahar Khaje Hosseini
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

3.  Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study.

Authors:  Sachin Chhatwani; Viola Rose-Zierau; Bassel Haddad; Mohammed Almuzian; Christian Kirschneck; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Palatal bone thickness at the implantation area of maxillary skeletal expander in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Weiting Chen; Kaili Zhang; Dongxu Liu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Evaluation of total bone and cortical bone thickness of the palate for temporary anchorage device insertion.

Authors:  Chen-Jung Chang; Wei-Cheng Lin; Meng-Yen Chen; Hung-Chih Chang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Description of a Digital Work-Flow for CBCT-Guided Construction of Micro-Implant Supported Maxillary Skeletal Expander.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Vincenzo Quinzi; Vincenzo Ronsivalle; Stefano Martina; Orazio Bennici; Gaetano Isola
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Annika Pliska; Caroline Busch; Benedict Wilmes; Michael Wolf; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-10-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.