| Literature DB >> 35788201 |
Thales Philipe Rodrigues da Silva1, Fernanda Penido Matozinhos2, Lúcia Helena Almeida Gratão3, Luana Lara Rocha4, Monique Louise Cassimiro Inácio5, Cristiane de Freitas Oliveira2, Tatiana Resende Prado Rangel de Oliveira6, Larissa Loures Mendes7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in adolescents has increased significantly in recent years. The growth of obesity is motivated by the association with modifiable behaviors, however, this behavioral are commonly evaluated individually, not considering the possibility of these factors coexisting in the individual. The purpose of this essay was to identify the coexistence of obesogenic behaviors among Brazilian adolescents and to assess the factors associated with the presence of these behaviors.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Obesity; Obesogenic behaviors
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35788201 PMCID: PMC9254523 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13708-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Obesogenic behavior indicator variables
| Obesogenic behavior | Question in the research | Definition adopted |
|---|---|---|
| "How many hours do you use the computer, watch TV or play video games on an average weekday?” | Numeric variable | |
| “Do you watch TV eating snacks like popcorn, cookies, snacks, sandwiches, chocolates or candies?” | The answer options were: "I don't watch TV eating snacks", "I watch TV eating snacks sometimes", "I watch TV eating snacks almost every day" and "I watch TV eating snacks every day" | |
| “Do you have breakfast?” | The answer options were: “I don't have breakfast”, “I have breakfast sometimes”, “I have breakfast almost every day” and “I have breakfast every day” | |
| Food consumption was assessed using a 24-h recall (24hR) through a face-to-face interview conducted by trained interviewers | Excessive consumption of UPF was considered when consumption was greater than or equal to the 80th percentile of the distribution (45.60% of the total caloric value (TCV)). A large quintile of consumption distribution (P80) was associated with an inadequate food intake profile and a high risk of obesity in previous studies (18) |
Factor loadings of the first components of the main component analysis of Brazilian adolescents included in the ERICA study. Brazil, 2013–2014
| Indicators | Pattern 1 |
|---|---|
| Percentage of ultra-processed food intake | |
| Screen hours | |
| Habit of snacking in front of the television | |
| Habit of having breakfast | |
| Eigenvalue | 1.2947 |
| Explained variance (%) | 32.37 |
| Overall KMO | 0.5569 |
Bivariate analysis based on the logistic regression model (OR and p-value) of the adolescent's characteristic to pattern 1 (obesogenic behavior) among Brazilian adolescents. – ERICA, Brazil, 2013–2014
| Variable | ||
|---|---|---|
| n(%) | OR(IC95%) | |
| Male | 8,216(38.68) | Ref |
| Female | 13,025(61.32) | 1.42( |
| White | 7,501(36.13) | Ref |
| Black | 1,770(8.52) | 1.28( |
| Brown | 10,766(51.85) | 1.09( |
| Yellow | 563(2.71) | 1.04(0.84 – 1.27) |
| Indigenous | 163(0.79) | 1.35(0.95 – 1.92) |
| 12 – 13 | 5,724(26.95) | Ref |
| 14 – 15 | 8,402(39.56) | 1.23( |
| 16 – 17 | 7,115(33.50) | 1.00(0.90 – 1.12) |
| Never | 2,028(11.22) | Ref |
| Sometimes | 4,484(24.81) | 0.82( |
| Always | 11,558(63.96) | 0.66( |
| | 8.62(3.61)b | 0.95( |
| Yes (Midwest, South and Southeast) | 11,826(55.68) | Ref |
| No (North and Northeast) | 9,415(44.32) | 0.64( |
| High | 4,296(21.40) | Ref |
| Medium | 15,297(76.19) | 1.07(0.97 – 1.17) |
| Low | 485(2.42) | 0.83(0.62 – 1.13) |
Note: OR Odds Ratio, 95%CI Confidence Interval
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001
aThird tertile of the pattern of obesogenic behavior, n = 21.241
bMean (SD)
Adjusted logistic regression model (OR and p-value) of the individual characteristic of the adolescent to obesogenic behaviors among Brazilian adolescents. – ERICA, Brazil, 2013–2014 (n = 71,552)
| Variable | Obesogenic behaviora |
|---|---|
| ORadj(IC 95%) | |
| Male | Ref |
| Female | 1.51 |
| White | Ref |
| Black | 1.30 |
| Brown | 1.06(0.96 – 1.17) |
| Yellow | 1.09(0.82 – 1.45) |
| Indigenous | 1.42(0.96 – 2.10) |
| Never | Ref |
| Sometimes | 0.82 |
| Always | 0.66 |
| | 0.96 |
| Yes (Midwest, South and Southeast) | Ref |
| No (North and Northeast) | 0.62 |
ORadj Adjusted Odds Ratio, 95%CI Confidence Interval
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001
*Model adjusted by the presented variables and wealth proxy
aThird tertile of the obesogenic behavior pattern