Joan M Conway1, Linda A Ingwersen, Bryan T Vinyard, Alanna J Moshfegh. 1. Diet and Human Performance Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. conway@bhnrc.arsusda.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: National surveys of food intake rely on the 24-h dietary recall method for assessing the nutrient intakes of Americans. OBJECTIVES: This observational validation study was conducted under controlled conditions to test the effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) 5-step multiple-pass method for dietary recall; to test the ability of normal weight, overweight, and obese women to recall food intake; and to test the accuracy of macronutrient recall. DESIGN: Women (n = 49) aged 21-65 y with a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 20-45 selected all meals and snacks for 1 d from a wide variety of foods. A 24-h dietary recall with the use of the USDA 5-step multiple-pass method was administered by telephone the following day. Analysis of variance and covariance tested the overall accuracy of recall and the effect of BMI on dietary recall. RESULTS: As a population, the women overestimated their energy and carbohydrate intakes by 8-10%. No significant differences between mean actual and recalled intakes of energy and the macronutrients were observed in the obese women. Normal-weight and overweight women significantly (P < 0.01) overestimated their energy, protein, and carbohydrate intakes. Recalled fat intake was not significantly different from actual intake in women across the BMI range studied. CONCLUSIONS: The USDA 5-step multiple-pass method effectively assessed mean energy intake within 10% of mean actual intake on the previous day. Obese women more accurately recalled food intake than did overweight and normal-weight women despite undereating on the day of the study.
BACKGROUND: National surveys of food intake rely on the 24-h dietary recall method for assessing the nutrient intakes of Americans. OBJECTIVES: This observational validation study was conducted under controlled conditions to test the effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) 5-step multiple-pass method for dietary recall; to test the ability of normal weight, overweight, and obesewomen to recall food intake; and to test the accuracy of macronutrient recall. DESIGN:Women (n = 49) aged 21-65 y with a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 20-45 selected all meals and snacks for 1 d from a wide variety of foods. A 24-h dietary recall with the use of the USDA 5-step multiple-pass method was administered by telephone the following day. Analysis of variance and covariance tested the overall accuracy of recall and the effect of BMI on dietary recall. RESULTS: As a population, the women overestimated their energy and carbohydrate intakes by 8-10%. No significant differences between mean actual and recalled intakes of energy and the macronutrients were observed in the obesewomen. Normal-weight and overweight women significantly (P < 0.01) overestimated their energy, protein, and carbohydrate intakes. Recalled fat intake was not significantly different from actual intake in women across the BMI range studied. CONCLUSIONS: The USDA 5-step multiple-pass method effectively assessed mean energy intake within 10% of mean actual intake on the previous day. Obesewomen more accurately recalled food intake than did overweight and normal-weight women despite undereating on the day of the study.
Authors: Lauren T Cook; Gillian A O'Reilly; Michael I Goran; Marc J Weigensberg; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Karin Jonsson; Malin Barman; Sara Moberg; Agneta Sjöberg; Hilde K Brekke; Bill Hesselmar; Susanne Johansen; Agnes E Wold; Ann-Sofie Sandberg Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Erica J Ambeba; Lei Ye; Susan M Sereika; Mindi A Styn; Sushama D Acharya; Mary Ann Sevick; Linda J Ewing; Molly B Conroy; Karen Glanz; Yaguang Zheng; Rachel W Goode; Meghan Mattos; Lora E Burke Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Heidi J Silver; Hakmook Kang; Charles D Keil; James A Muldowney; Heidi Kocalis; Sergio Fazio; Douglas E Vaughan; Kevin D Niswender Journal: Metabolism Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Lauren T Ptomey; Stephen D Herrmann; Jaehoon Lee; Debra K Sullivan; Mary F Rondon; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Rachel Novotny; Vinutha Vijayadeva; John Grove; Joel Gittelsohn; Joanne Avila; Yuhua Su; Suzanne Murphy Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2012-12