| Literature DB >> 35784406 |
Muhammad Adnan Shan1,2, Julie Mechlenborg1, Rebecca Røgen1, Claus Børsting1, Niels Morling1.
Abstract
We investigated the forensic efficacy of the 30 insertion/deletion (Indel) markers included in the Qiagen Investigator® DIPplex kit in 529 Pakistani individuals from five major subpopulations in Pakistan (Punjabi, Pashtun, Sindhi, Saraiki, and Baloch). In the Sindhi population, the distribution of HLD81 and HLD97 alleles deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction. The combined match probability ranged from 2.0E-12 (Pashtun and Baloch) to 1.0E-12 (Sindhi), and the mean paternity exclusion power varied from 0.995 (Punjabi, Sindhi, and Saraiki) to 0.996 (Pashtun and Baloch). The high combined power of discrimination (0.999 999 999 999 97) and low combined match probability (1.7E-12) for all subpopulations studied support the utility of the 30 Indel markers for forensic identification in the studied subpopulations. The allele frequencies of the Indel markers in the Pakistani subpopulations were compared with those from 18 other populations. The results show that the populations clustered according to geography. The subpopulations investigated in this work showed a close genetic relationship with others from Pakistan, as well as with South Central Asian and Middle Eastern populations. The results suggest that the Investigator® DIPplex kit can be useful as a supplementary tool for human identification in the five Pakistani subpopulations investigated in this study. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1933366 .Entities:
Keywords: Forensic sciences; Qiagen; anthropology; forensic genetics; individual identification; investigator® DIPplex kit; population genetics
Year: 2021 PMID: 35784406 PMCID: PMC9245971 DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1933366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Forensic Sci Res ISSN: 2471-1411
Parameters of genetic diversity and forensic efficiency for 30 Indels in five Pakistani subpopulations.
| Population | Hoa | Hea | MPEa | CMP | CPI (trio) | CPI (duo) | CPD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Punjabi | 0.464 | 0.467 | 0.995 | 1.2E-12 | 2220 | 146 | 0.999 999 999 999 94 | |
| Pashtun | 0.462 | 0.477 | 0.996 | 2.0E-12 | 2300 | 155 | 0.999 999 999 999 98 | |
| Sindhi | 0.425 | 0.471 | 0.995 | 1.0E-12 | 2230 | 149 | 0.999 999 999 999 94 | |
| Saraiki | 0.435 | 0.466 | 0.995 | 1.1E-12 | 2190 | 145 | 0.999 999 999 999 96 | |
| Baloch | 0.456 | 0.473 | 0.996 | 2.0E-12 | 2270 | 151 | 0.999 999 999 999 90 | |
| All | 0.450 | 0.492 | 0.996 | 1.7E-12 | 2270 | 152 | 0.999 999 999 999 97 |
Ho: observed heterozygosity; He: expected heterozygosity; MPE: mean paternity exclusion power; CMP: combined matching probability; CPI: combined paternity index; CPD: combined power of discrimination. amean values.
Figure 1.Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot based on pairwise F values of five Pakistani subpopulations and 18 other populations.
The studied Pakistani subpopulations indicated by triangles clustered closely together and to geographically neighbouring populations.
BAL: Baloch (present study); BGD: Bangladeshi; DNK: Danish; FIN: Finnish; GRC: Greek; HAN: Han; IND: Indian; IRN: Iranian; IRQ: Iraqi; JPN: Japanese; LTU: Lithuanian; NGA: Nigerian; PAS: Pashtun (present study); PUN: Punjabi (present study); PUN1: Punjabi1; SAR: Saraiki (present study); SIN: Sindhi (present study); SVN: Slovenian; SOM: Somali; TUR: Turkish; TBT: Tibetan; TW: Taiwan people (the specific population is not available in original reference); UGR: Uyghur.
The references to the original population data are shown in Supplementary Table S2.