Literature DB >> 35781967

Multi-class classification of breast tissue using optical coherence tomography and attenuation imaging combined via deep learning.

Ken Y Foo1,2, Kyle Newman1,2, Qi Fang1,2, Peijun Gong1,2, Hina M Ismail1,2, Devina D Lakhiani1,2, Renate Zilkens1,3, Benjamin F Dessauvagie4,5, Bruce Latham5,6, Christobel M Saunders3,7,8,9, Lixin Chin1,2, Brendan F Kennedy1,2,10.   

Abstract

We demonstrate a convolutional neural network (CNN) for multi-class breast tissue classification as adipose tissue, benign dense tissue, or malignant tissue, using multi-channel optical coherence tomography (OCT) and attenuation images, and a novel Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC)-based loss function that correlates more strongly with performance metrics than the commonly used cross-entropy loss. We hypothesized that using multi-channel images would increase tumor detection performance compared to using OCT alone. 5,804 images from 29 patients were used to fine-tune a pre-trained ResNet-18 network. Adding attenuation images to OCT images yields statistically significant improvements in several performance metrics, including benign dense tissue sensitivity (68.0% versus 59.6%), malignant tissue positive predictive value (PPV) (79.4% versus 75.5%), and total accuracy (85.4% versus 83.3%), indicating that the additional contrast from attenuation imaging is most beneficial for distinguishing between benign dense tissue and malignant tissue.
© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35781967      PMCID: PMC9208580          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.455110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.562


  57 in total

1.  Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010.

Authors:  Lee G Wilke; Tomasz Czechura; Chih Wang; Brittany Lapin; Erik Liederbach; David P Winchester; Katharine Yao
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Visualization and tissue classification of human breast cancer images using ultrahigh-resolution OCT.

Authors:  Xinwen Yao; Yu Gan; Ernest Chang; Hanina Hibshoosh; Sheldon Feldman; Christine Hendon
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Patient-level costs in margin re-excision for breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Y Grant; R Al-Khudairi; E St John; M Barschkett; D Cunningham; R Al-Mufti; K Hogben; P Thiruchelvam; D J Hadjiminas; A Darzi; A W Carter; D R Leff
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  A survey on incorporating domain knowledge into deep learning for medical image analysis.

Authors:  Xiaozheng Xie; Jianwei Niu; Xuefeng Liu; Zhengsu Chen; Shaojie Tang; Shui Yu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  K A Vermeer; J Mo; J J A Weda; H G Lemij; J F de Boer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Techniques for Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edward Robert St John; Rashed Al-Khudairi; Hutan Ashrafian; Thanos Athanasiou; Zoltan Takats; Dimitri John Hadjiminas; Ara Darzi; Daniel Richard Leff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation.

Authors:  Davide Chicco; Niklas Tötsch; Giuseppe Jurman
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.522

8.  Clinical outcomes of an intraoperative surgical margin assessment using the fresh frozen section method in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery - a single center analysis.

Authors:  Tomasz Nowikiewicz; Ewa Śrutek; Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek; Magdalena Tarkowska; Agnieszka Żyromska; Wojciech Zegarski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Accuracy of gross intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer: experience since the SSO-ASTRO margin consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Alberto Nunez; Veronica Jones; Katherine Schulz-Costello; Daniel Schmolze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Intraoperative Evaluation of Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery for In Situ and Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Caroline Koopmansch; Jean-Christophe Noël; Calliope Maris; Philippe Simon; Marième Sy; Xavier Catteau
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2021-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.