Literature DB >> 30566233

Patient-level costs in margin re-excision for breast-conserving surgery.

Y Grant1, R Al-Khudairi1, E St John1, M Barschkett1, D Cunningham2, R Al-Mufti2, K Hogben2, P Thiruchelvam2, D J Hadjiminas2, A Darzi1, A W Carter1, D R Leff1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High rates of reoperation following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for positive margins are associated with costs to healthcare providers. The aim was to assess the quality of evidence on reported re-excision costs and compare the direct patient-level costs between patients undergoing successful BCS versus reoperations after BCS.
METHODS: The study used data from women who had BCS with or without reoperation at a single institution between April 2015 and March 2016. A systematic review of health economic analysis in BCS was conducted and scored using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. Financial data were retrieved using the Patient-Level Information and Costing Systems (PLICS) for patients. Exchange rates used were: US $1 = £0·75, £1 = €1·14 and US $1 = €0·85.
RESULTS: The median QHES score was 47 (i.q.r. 32·5-79). Only two of nine studies scored in the upper QHES quartile (score at least 75). Costs of initial lumpectomy and reoperation were in the range US $1234-11786 and $655-9136 respectively. Over a 12-month interval, 153 patients had definitive BCS and 59 patients underwent reoperation. The median cost of reoperations after BCS (59 patients) was £4511 (range 1752-18 019), representing an additional £2136 per patient compared with BCS without reoperation (P < 0·001).
CONCLUSION: The systematic review demonstrated variation in methodological approach to cost estimates and a paucity of high-quality cost estimate studies for reoperations. Extrapolating local PLICS data to a national level suggests that getting BCS right first time could result in substantial savings.
© 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30566233     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

1.  Radiological Underestimation of Tumor Size Influences the Success Rate of Re-Excision after Breast-conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Duncan Simpson; Jennifer Allan; Brendan McFall
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-10-04

Review 2.  Research on the Economics of Cancer-Related Health Care: An Overview of the Review Literature.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Kaitlin Akif; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Multi-class classification of breast tissue using optical coherence tomography and attenuation imaging combined via deep learning.

Authors:  Ken Y Foo; Kyle Newman; Qi Fang; Peijun Gong; Hina M Ismail; Devina D Lakhiani; Renate Zilkens; Benjamin F Dessauvagie; Bruce Latham; Christobel M Saunders; Lixin Chin; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Economic Impact of Reducing Reexcision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health System.

Authors:  Jeffery M Chakedis; Annie Tang; Alison Savitz; Liisa L Lyon; Patricia E Palacios; Brooke Vuong; Maihgan A Kavanagh; Gillian E Kuehner; Sharon B Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 5.  Cysteine Cathepsins in Breast Cancer: Promising Targets for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.

Authors:  Daan G J Linders; Okker D Bijlstra; Laura C Fallert; Denise E Hilling; Ethan Walker; Brian Straight; Taryn L March; A Rob P M Valentijn; Martin Pool; Jacobus Burggraaf; James P Basilion; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.484

6.  Patient-level costs of staged unilateral versus immediate bilateral symmetrization mammoplasty in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Yasmin Grant; Paul T R Thiruchelvam; Lana Kovacevic; Elias Mossialos; Ragheed Al-Mufti; Katy Hogben; Dimitri J Hadjiminas; Daniel R Leff
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-05-02

7.  Rates of re-excision and conversion to mastectomy after breast-conserving surgery with or without oncoplastic surgery: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  E Heeg; M B Jensen; L R Hölmich; A Bodilsen; R A E M Tollenaar; A V Laenkholm; B V Offersen; B Ejlertsen; M A M Mureau; P M Christiansen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Precision Breast-Conserving Surgery With Microwave Ablation Guidance: A Pilot Single-Center, Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hong Pan; Mengjia Qian; Hao Chen; Hui Wang; Muxin Yu; Kai Zhang; Siqi Wang; Jing Deng; Yi Xu; Lijun Ling; Qiang Ding; Hui Xie; Shui Wang; Wenbin Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  The Impact of Temporal Variation in Indocyanine Green Administration on Tumor Identification During Fluorescence Guided Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Martha S Kedrzycki; Maria Leiloglou; Vadzim Chalau; Nicolas Chiarini; Paul T R Thiruchelvam; Dimitri J Hadjiminas; Katy R Hogben; Faiza Rashid; Rathi Ramakrishnan; Ara W Darzi; Daniel S Elson; Daniel R Leff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.344

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.