Talha Badar1, Timothy Chlon2,3. 1. Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. badar.talha@mayo.edu. 2. Division of Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. timothy.chlon@cchmc.org. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. timothy.chlon@cchmc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While DDX41 mutation (m) is one of the most prevalent predisposition genes in adult myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), most patients do not always present with a family history of MDS/AML. In this review, we will be highlighting epidemiological data on DDX41m, roles of DDX41 in oncogenesis, mechanisms of clonal evolution with somatic DDX41m, and clinical phenotypes and management of MDS/AML in patients harboring DDX41m. RECENT FINDINGS: DDX41 encodes a DEAD-box helicase protein that is considered essential for cell growth and viability. High incidence of myeloid malignancies and other cancers in patients bearing DDX41m suggests that defects in DDX41 lead to loss of a tumor suppressor function, likely related to activities in RNA splicing and processing pathways. Seventy percent of cancer cases with DDX41m are associated with MDS/AML alone. More than 65% of familial cases harbor heterozygous germline frameshift mutations, of which p.D140Gfs*2 is the most common. A somatic DDX41m of the second allele is acquired in 70% of cases, leading to hematological malignancy. Myeloid neoplasms with DDX41m are typically characterized by long latency, high-risk disease at presentation with normal cytogenetics and without any additional molecular markers. Recent reports suggests that a subgroup of these patients have an indolent clinical course and have a better long-term survival compared to favorable or intermediate risk AML. Distinct clinical/pathologic features and favorable outcomes in MDS/AML highlight the need for standardized classification and gene specific guidelines that could assist in management decisions in patients with DDX41m.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While DDX41 mutation (m) is one of the most prevalent predisposition genes in adult myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), most patients do not always present with a family history of MDS/AML. In this review, we will be highlighting epidemiological data on DDX41m, roles of DDX41 in oncogenesis, mechanisms of clonal evolution with somatic DDX41m, and clinical phenotypes and management of MDS/AML in patients harboring DDX41m. RECENT FINDINGS: DDX41 encodes a DEAD-box helicase protein that is considered essential for cell growth and viability. High incidence of myeloid malignancies and other cancers in patients bearing DDX41m suggests that defects in DDX41 lead to loss of a tumor suppressor function, likely related to activities in RNA splicing and processing pathways. Seventy percent of cancer cases with DDX41m are associated with MDS/AML alone. More than 65% of familial cases harbor heterozygous germline frameshift mutations, of which p.D140Gfs*2 is the most common. A somatic DDX41m of the second allele is acquired in 70% of cases, leading to hematological malignancy. Myeloid neoplasms with DDX41m are typically characterized by long latency, high-risk disease at presentation with normal cytogenetics and without any additional molecular markers. Recent reports suggests that a subgroup of these patients have an indolent clinical course and have a better long-term survival compared to favorable or intermediate risk AML. Distinct clinical/pathologic features and favorable outcomes in MDS/AML highlight the need for standardized classification and gene specific guidelines that could assist in management decisions in patients with DDX41m.
Authors: Andrés E Quesada; Mark J Routbort; Courtney D DiNardo; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Joseph D Khoury; Beenu Thakral; Zhuang Zuo; C Cameron Yin; Sanam Loghavi; Chi Y Ok; Sa A Wang; Zhenya Tang; Sarah A Bannon; Christopher B Benton; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Keyur P Patel Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Iman Abou Dalle; Hagop Kantarjian; Sarah A Bannon; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Mark Routbort; Keyur P Patel; Shimin Hu; Kapil Bhalla; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Courtney D DiNardo Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Marie Sébert; Marie Passet; Anna Raimbault; Ramy Rahmé; Emmanuel Raffoux; Flore Sicre de Fontbrune; Marco Cerrano; Samuel Quentin; Nadia Vasquez; Mélanie Da Costa; Nicolas Boissel; Hervé Dombret; Régis Peffault de Latour; Gérard Socié; Raphaël Itzykson; Pierre Fenaux; Jean Soulier; Lionel Adès; Emmanuelle Clappier Journal: Blood Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman Journal: Blood Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Chantana Polprasert; Isabell Schulze; Mikkael A Sekeres; Hideki Makishima; Bartlomiej Przychodzen; Naoko Hosono; Jarnail Singh; Richard A Padgett; Xiaorong Gu; James G Phillips; Michael Clemente; Yvonne Parker; Daniel Lindner; Brittney Dienes; Eckhard Jankowsky; Yogen Saunthararajah; Yang Du; Kevin Oakley; Nhu Nguyen; Sudipto Mukherjee; Caroline Pabst; Lucy A Godley; Jane E Churpek; Daniel A Pollyea; Utz Krug; Wolfgang E Berdel; Hans-Ulrich Klein; Martin Dugas; Yuichi Shiraishi; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Satoru Miyano; Kenichi Yoshida; Seishi Ogawa; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Hassan B Alkhateeb; Ahmad Nanaa; David Viswanatha; James M Foran; Talha Badar; Lisa Sproat; Rong He; Phuong Nguyen; Dragan Jevremovic; Mohamad E Salama; Patricia Greipp; Naseema Gangat; Ayalew Tefferi; Mark R Litzow; Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Mithun Vinod Shah; Mrinal Patnaik; Aref Al-Kali Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2022-01-25