Literature DB >> 34644397

Genetic features and clinical outcomes of patients with isolated and comutated DDX41-mutated myeloid neoplasms.

Hassan B Alkhateeb1, Ahmad Nanaa1, David Viswanatha2, James M Foran3, Talha Badar3, Lisa Sproat4, Rong He2, Phuong Nguyen2, Dragan Jevremovic2, Mohamad E Salama2, Patricia Greipp5, Naseema Gangat1, Ayalew Tefferi1, Mark R Litzow1, Abhishek A Mangaonkar1, Mithun Vinod Shah1, Mrinal Patnaik1, Aref Al-Kali1.   

Abstract

DDX41 mutations (germline and somatic) are associated with late onset myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML). Myeloid neoplasms (MN) with germline predisposition was identified as a distinct category in the 2016 WHO classification revision, including MN with germline DDX41 mutation. We retrospectively analyzed the molecular findings and clinical characteristics of thirty-three DDX41-mutated (mDDX41) patients at our institution. We identified 14 distinct pathogenic DDX41 variants in 32 patients and 8 DDX41 variants of unknown significance (VUS) in 9 patients. Five (16%) patients had a second DDX41 somatic mutation p.R525H and 13 (40%) had at least one additional oncogenic co-mutation in other genes. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 66 years, with male predominance (72%) and the majority of patients had normal cytogenetics (91%). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 86% and 6 (21%) MDS/AML patients with relatively preserved hematopoietic function were observed without further intervention. In comparison to AML patients with prognostically more favorable subtypes [t(8;21), n=27 and inv(16), n=40], mDDX41 patients in our cohort showed similarly favorable OS. Our study highlights that mDDX41-MN patients often have an indolent course and mDDX41-AML has comparable OS to favorable-risk AML.
© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34644397      PMCID: PMC8791578          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


Introduction

The DEAD-box helicase 41 (DDX41) gene, located on chromosome 5q35, is presumed to be a tumor suppressor gene, encoding a DEAD-box type RNA helicase. DDX41 is involved in pre-mRNA splicing, rRNA processing and innate immunity.[1-3] Unlike other germline predisposition syndromes, which typically present at an earlier age, DDX41-associated germline cases are characterized by late-onset development of myeloid neoplasms (MNs), and may occur as sporadic germline events.1,2,[ DDX41 mutations account for 0.5% to 5% of adult myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and typically present as high-risk disease, with male predominance and variable history of preceding cytopenias.1,2,[ Recent studies have reported that DDX41-related MN is associated with longer overall survival (OS) and response to lenalidomide.[10,14,17,18] In this study, we describe the clinical and genetic features and survival outcomes of patients with mutated DDX41.

Methods

This is a single-institution study encompassing the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center sites (Rochester, Florida, and Arizona). After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively screened for mDDX41 cases from 4524 consecutive Mayo Clinic patient samples submitted for a 42-gene MN panel next-generation sequencing clinical assay in the Molecular Hematopathology Laboratory between July 2018 and December 2020. A chart review of mDDX41 cases between January 2009 and April 2021 was conducted. Of 1404 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of AML, 27 (1.9%) patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1); RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and 40 (2.8%) with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11 were identified for survival comparison with mDDX41 AML. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 14.1.0 Software (supplemental Methods).

Results and discussion

We identified 33 patients harboring DDX41 genetic alterations, of which 32 (97%) had at least 1 pathogenic DDX41 mutation and 1 (3%) had a DDX41 variant of uncertain significance (VUS) (proven to be a germline variant). Of the 32 patients harboring pathogenic mutations, 5 (16%) had a second DDX41 mutation (p.R525H), and 9 (27%) harbored a DDX41 VUS (Figure 1; supplemental Table 1). The germline origin of DDX41 variants was confirmed in 9 of 10 (90%) tested patients, among them at least 1 variant had variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥ 40%.
Figure 1.

Characteristics of patients with DDX41 mutation. (A) Representation of DDX41 variants detected, positioned on the DDX41 protein and its functional domains. (B) Patterns of the mutations identified in the cohort of 33 patients with DDX41 mutation. The number reported in the box represents the VAF of each mutation. (C-D) Kaplan-Meier survival curves in 10 patients with mDDX41 AML compared with (C) 40 patients with inv 16 AML and (D) 27 patient with t(8;21) AML. CTD, C-terminal domain; ZFD, zinc finger domain; Δ, second mutation.

Characteristics of patients with DDX41 mutation. (A) Representation of DDX41 variants detected, positioned on the DDX41 protein and its functional domains. (B) Patterns of the mutations identified in the cohort of 33 patients with DDX41 mutation. The number reported in the box represents the VAF of each mutation. (C-D) Kaplan-Meier survival curves in 10 patients with mDDX41 AML compared with (C) 40 patients with inv 16 AML and (D) 27 patient with t(8;21) AML. CTD, C-terminal domain; ZFD, zinc finger domain; Δ, second mutation. The median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range, 30-81 years), and 24 (72%) patients were men, consistent with late onset of mDDX41 MN and male predominance previously reported.8,[ All patients with AML were intermediate risk for the European LeukemiaNet (ELN), with a median marrow blast count of 29% (range, 20%-50%). The majority of MDSs were classified as excess blasts-2 (MDS-EB2; N = 13; 68%), similar to that previously reported in the literature.[15,16,19] Eleven (58%) and 4 (21%) patients with MDS were classified as intermediate risk and high risk by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), respectively. Twenty (60%) patients had an isolated DDX41 mutation, whereas 13 (40%) had at least 1 additional comutation in other genes. Isolated mDDX41 cases showed male predominance relative to their comutated counterparts (85% vs 54%; P = .05; Table 1). The median number of comutations in the 13 cases was 1 (range,1-3), and the most common comutations occurred in DNMT3A (N = 5, 38%), ASXL1 (N = 4, 30%), JAK2 (N = 3, 23%), and EZH2 (N = 2, 15%; Figure 1; supplemental Tables 1 and 2). The incidence of TP53 mutation was infrequent (3%), comparable to what was reported by Sébert et al[15] (6%) but lower than that reported by Quesada et al[16] (32%). Similarly, we observed a low incidence of splicing factor comutations (3%), in keeping with the report from Sébert et al.[10,16] Our cohort had fewer comutations (median of 0; range, 0-3) than what reported by recent studies, and interestingly, the comutation median VAF observed here was low 7% (range, 5%-52%).[15,16]
Table 1.

Characteristics and hematologic features of patients with isolated and comutated DDX41 mutation

VariableIsolatedComutated P
No. of patients, (%)20 (60)13 (40)
Age, y, median (range), at diagnosis65 (30-81)66 (50-76).767
Sex (male), n (%)17 (85)7 (54).0496*
Hemoglobin, g/dL, median (range)11.2 (7.5-15.6)10.05 (6.6-14).1988
Leukocytes, 109/L, median (range)2.15 (1-4.4)2.4 (1.6-8.5).1239
Thrombocytes, 109/L, median (range)87 (28-241)94 (63-571).1443
ANC, median (range)0.925 (0.16-3.73)1.005 (0.65-4.78).2058
MCV median (range)104.3 (85.2-114.8)105.6 (90-115).7151
RDW, median (range)14.2 (12.4-23.4)15.05 (12.5-21.3).2824
BM blasts, median (range)13 (1-45)12 (0-50).6056
BM blasts (AML only), median (range)34 (20-45)25.5 (21-50).91
Number of comutations, median (range)01 (1-3)
DDX41 VAF %48 (7-52)45 (5-51).1656
DDX41 mutations > 12 (10)3 (23).306
Pathogenic mutation type
 Missense5 (26)3 (23).8354
 Nonsense1 (5)2 (15).3347
 Frameshift4 (21)5 (38).2820
 Splice site mutation02 (15).0774
 Start-loss variant9 (47)1 (7).0174*
Diagnosis
 MDS13 (65)6 (46).2845
 AML6 (30)4 (30).96
 MPN02 (15)
 Carrier1 (5)0
 CCUS01 (7)
Abnormal cytogenetics03 (25).0188*
Family history
 Solid or hematologic malignancies11 (61)12 (92).0501
 Solid tumors6 (33)10 (77).0166*
 Hematologic malignancies8 (44)4 (30).4405
 Gastrointestinal malignancies3 (15)3 (23).6040
 Genitourinary malignancies2 (10)4 (30).1496
 Lung cancer1 (5)3 (23).1345
 Breast cancer2 (10)2 (15).6832
Any personal history
 Hematologic malignancies01 (7).2078
 Solid tumors1 (5)3 (23).1200
DDX41 VUS
 Yes5 (25)4 (30).7161
 No15 (75)9 (70)

ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BM, bone marrow; CCUS, clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; RDW, red cell distribution width.

Statistically significant.

Characteristics and hematologic features of patients with isolated and comutated DDX41 mutation ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BM, bone marrow; CCUS, clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; RDW, red cell distribution width. Statistically significant. The most common pathogenic mutation type was the initiation codon substitution (start-loss) variant p.M1I (N = 10, 31%; Table 1; supplemental Table 1), previously described as the second most common germline DDX41 variant in Whites and the most common in Swedish population.[8,14,15] Among isolated cases, 47% had p.M1I, whereas only 8% of comutated cases harbored p.M1I (P = .02). Twenty-one (65.6%) DDX41 mutations clustered in the N-terminal domain (NTD), 4 (12.5%) in the DEAD-box domain, and 7 (22%) in the helicase-C domain (HCD). Mutations located in the HCD were more likely to have a concomitant DDX41 VUS compared with NTD mutations (N = 6, 86% vs N = 2, 10%; P = .0001). Sixteen patients (52%) had a family history (FH) of solid tumors and 12 (39%) had a FH of hematologic malignancies. Comutated cases were more likely to have FH of solid tumors (77% vs 33%; P = .02; Table 1).[20] However, this difference was not significant for hematologic or subgroups of solid malignancies. None of the HCD-mutated cases had FH of solid tumors, in comparison with 70% seen in NTD-mutated cases (P = .001), supporting the reported prevalence of germline mutations in the NTD.[8] Cytogenetic results were available in 32 cases, and 29 (91%) showed a normal karyotype. Karyotypic abnormalities were thus infrequent (N = 3, 9%), consistent with previous reports.[15,16,19] Interestingly, all 3 cases with karyotypic abnormalities were comutated cases (P = .02). Overall, 2 (7%) patients died after a median follow-up of 20 months. Six (20%) patients (5 MDS and 1 AML) were observed because of stable blood indices with a median follow-up of 6.6 months (range, 1.5-32.6 months). Twenty-three (80%) patients received treatment with median time from diagnosis to treatment initiation of 0.7 months (range, 0-92 months). Overall response rate in patients with MDS/AML was 77%, and median time to response was 3.2 months (range, 0.9-20.5 months; supplemental Table 3). Fifteen (68%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 2 (9%) patients had hematologic improvement, and 3 (23%) patients did not respond. Patients with AML had 100% CR when treated with induction chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents (HMA) plus venetoclax regimen, and median time to CR was 1 month (range, 0.86-4.1 months). Of the 9 (39%) patients who received second-line therapy, 6 (75%) achieved CR. Four (21%) of 19 patients with MDS progressed into AML with a median time to progression of 16 months (range, 1.3-27.6 months), and the 2-year progression-free survival rate for patients with MDS was 62%. In mDDX41 MDS/AML, the median OS was not reached, and the 2-year OS was 86% (95% confidence interval: 57%-97%). There was no statistically significant difference in OS between 2-year OS for isolated and comutated (P = .99) responders and nonresponders (90% vs 50%; P = .38) and treatment compared with the 2-year OS for the observation group (83% vs 100%; P = .52; supplemental Figure 1). Twelve (41%) patients with MDS/AML received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and there was no difference in 2-year OS between patients who received HSCT vs no HSCT (87% vs 86%; P = 1.0; supplemental Figure 1). All patients with mDDX41 AML were alive at the end of follow-up without reaching median OS. Comparing the OS of mDDX41 AML to the prognostically favorable group of core-binding factor AML, a statistically significant superior outcome was observed in mDDX41-AML compared with AML with t(8;21) (2-year OS, 100% vs 51%; P = .024; Figure 1D). In comparison with AML with inv(16), mDDX41 AML showed a trend to better OS; however, statistical significance was not achieved (2-year OS, 100% vs 84%; P = .2), supporting at least noninferior clinical outcome (Figure 1C). Our study reaffirms some previous observations and demonstrates several novel findings in patients with MN and mDDX41. Isolated DDX41 mutations were associated with male predominance (85%), the start-loss p.M1I mutation (47%), normal cytogenetics (100%), and less frequent association with a FH of solid tumors (33%) compared with their comutated counterpart. Patients with mDDX41 MN have a low incidence of TP53 and splicing factor gene comutations. Despite the categorization of all patients with mDDX41 AML intermediate risk for ELN, we found they fit favorable-risk AML in our study cohort.[21-23] Finally, some mDDX41 MN cases can be observed for a long time if they have preserved hematopoiesis, and therapeutic intervention could be delayed. We acknowledge that our study is limited by the retrospective nature and small sample size.

Supplementary Material

The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement. Click here for additional data file.
  22 in total

1.  Germline ETV6 mutations in familial thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancy.

Authors:  Michael Y Zhang; Jane E Churpek; Siobán B Keel; Tom Walsh; Ming K Lee; Keith R Loeb; Suleyman Gulsuner; Colin C Pritchard; Marilyn Sanchez-Bonilla; Jeffrey J Delrow; Ryan S Basom; Melissa Forouhar; Boglarka Gyurkocza; Bradford S Schwartz; Barbara Neistadt; Rafael Marquez; Christopher J Mariani; Scott A Coats; Inga Hofmann; R Coleman Lindsley; David A Williams; Janis L Abkowitz; Marshall S Horwitz; Mary-Claire King; Lucy A Godley; Akiko Shimamura
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  A landscape of germ line mutations in a cohort of inherited bone marrow failure patients.

Authors:  Olivier Bluteau; Marie Sebert; Thierry Leblanc; Régis Peffault de Latour; Samuel Quentin; Elodie Lainey; Lucie Hernandez; Jean-Hugues Dalle; Flore Sicre de Fontbrune; Etienne Lengline; Raphael Itzykson; Emmanuelle Clappier; Nicolas Boissel; Nadia Vasquez; Mélanie Da Costa; Julien Masliah-Planchon; Wendy Cuccuini; Anna Raimbault; Louis De Jaegere; Lionel Adès; Pierre Fenaux; Sébastien Maury; Claudine Schmitt; Marc Muller; Carine Domenech; Nicolas Blin; Bénédicte Bruno; Isabelle Pellier; Mathilde Hunault; Stéphane Blanche; Arnaud Petit; Guy Leverger; Gérard Michel; Yves Bertrand; André Baruchel; Gérard Socié; Jean Soulier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Novel germ line DDX41 mutations define families with a lower age of MDS/AML onset and lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Maya Lewinsohn; Anna L Brown; Luke M Weinel; Connie Phung; George Rafidi; Ming K Lee; Andreas W Schreiber; Jinghua Feng; Milena Babic; Chan-Eng Chong; Young Lee; Agnes Yong; Graeme K Suthers; Nicola Poplawski; Meryl Altree; Kerry Phillips; Louise Jaensch; Miriam Fine; Richard J D'Andrea; Ian D Lewis; Bruno C Medeiros; Daniel A Pollyea; Mary-Claire King; Tom Walsh; Siobán Keel; Akiko Shimamura; Lucy A Godley; Christopher N Hahn; Jane E Churpek; Hamish S Scott
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Myeloid neoplasms with germline DDX41 mutation.

Authors:  Jesse J C Cheah; Christopher N Hahn; Devendra K Hiwase; Hamish S Scott; Anna L Brown
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  The helicase DDX41 senses intracellular DNA mediated by the adaptor STING in dendritic cells.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Zhang; Bin Yuan; Musheng Bao; Ning Lu; Taeil Kim; Yong-Jun Liu
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 6.  Universal genetic testing for inherited susceptibility in children and adults with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: are we there yet?

Authors:  Kiran Tawana; Michael W Drazer; Jane E Churpek
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Hereditary Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis, Questions, and Controversies.

Authors:  Imo J Akpan; Afaf E G Osman; Michael W Drazer; Lucy A Godley
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Inherited and Somatic Defects in DDX41 in Myeloid Neoplasms.

Authors:  Chantana Polprasert; Isabell Schulze; Mikkael A Sekeres; Hideki Makishima; Bartlomiej Przychodzen; Naoko Hosono; Jarnail Singh; Richard A Padgett; Xiaorong Gu; James G Phillips; Michael Clemente; Yvonne Parker; Daniel Lindner; Brittney Dienes; Eckhard Jankowsky; Yogen Saunthararajah; Yang Du; Kevin Oakley; Nhu Nguyen; Sudipto Mukherjee; Caroline Pabst; Lucy A Godley; Jane E Churpek; Daniel A Pollyea; Utz Krug; Wolfgang E Berdel; Hans-Ulrich Klein; Martin Dugas; Yuichi Shiraishi; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Satoru Miyano; Kenichi Yoshida; Seishi Ogawa; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Heritable GATA2 mutations associated with familial myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher N Hahn; Chan-Eng Chong; Catherine L Carmichael; Ella J Wilkins; Peter J Brautigan; Xiao-Chun Li; Milena Babic; Ming Lin; Amandine Carmagnac; Young K Lee; Chung H Kok; Lucia Gagliardi; Kathryn L Friend; Paul G Ekert; Carolyn M Butcher; Anna L Brown; Ian D Lewis; L Bik To; Andrew E Timms; Jan Storek; Sarah Moore; Meryl Altree; Robert Escher; Peter G Bardy; Graeme K Suthers; Richard J D'Andrea; Marshall S Horwitz; Hamish S Scott
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Molecular and clinical features of myeloid neoplasms with somatic DDX41 mutations.

Authors:  Shiqiang Qu; Bing Li; Tiejun Qin; Zefeng Xu; Lijuan Pan; Naibo Hu; Gang Huang; Robert Peter Gale; Zhijian Xiao
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 8.615

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Germline and Somatic Defects in DDX41 and its Impact on Myeloid Neoplasms.

Authors:  Talha Badar; Timothy Chlon
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.213

2.  DDX41 coordinates RNA splicing and transcriptional elongation to prevent DNA replication stress in hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  Satoru Shinriki; Mayumi Hirayama; Akiko Nagamachi; Akihiko Yokoyama; Takeshi Kawamura; Akinori Kanai; Hidehiko Kawai; Junichi Iwakiri; Rin Liu; Manabu Maeshiro; Saruul Tungalag; Masayoshi Tasaki; Mitsuharu Ueda; Kazuhito Tomizawa; Naoyuki Kataoka; Takashi Ideue; Yutaka Suzuki; Kiyoshi Asai; Tokio Tani; Toshiya Inaba; Hirotaka Matsui
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 12.883

3.  DDX41 is required for cGAS-STING activation against DNA virus infection.

Authors:  Ravi Shankar Singh; Venkatasubramanian Vidhyasagar; Shizhuo Yang; Ananna Bhadra Arna; Manisha Yadav; Aanchal Aggarwal; Alexya N Aguilera; Satoru Shinriki; Kalpana Kalyanasundaram Bhanumathy; Kannupriya Pandey; Aizhang Xu; Noreen Rapin; Mark Bosch; John DeCoteau; Jim Xiang; Franco J Vizeacoumar; Yan Zhou; Vikram Misra; Hirotaka Matsui; Susan R Ross; Yuliang Wu
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 9.995

4.  Impaired Overall Survival in Young Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Variants in Genes Predisposing for Myeloid Malignancies.

Authors:  Martin Kirschner; Benjamin Rolles; Martina Crysandt; Christoph Röllig; Friedrich Stölzel; Michael Kramer; Martin Bornhäuser; Hubert Serve; Uwe Platzbecker; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Kim Kricheldorf; Margherita Vieri; Matthias Begemann; Angela Maurer; Marcin W Wlodarski; Sushree S Sahoo; Tim H Brümmendorf; Edgar Jost; Fabian Beier
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2022-10-12

Review 5.  Cytogenetic and Genetic Abnormalities with Diagnostic Value in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Focus on the Pre-Messenger RNA Splicing Process.

Authors:  Nathalie Douet-Guilbert; Benoît Soubise; Delphine G Bernard; Marie-Bérengère Troadec
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07

6.  Outcomes of allogeneic transplant in patients with DDX41 mutated myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Anmol Baranwal; Ahmad Nanaa; David Viswanatha; Rong He; James Foran; Talha Badar; William J Hogan; Mark R Litzow; Mithun Vinod Shah; Mrinal M Patnaik; Aref Al-Kali; Hassan B Alkhateeb
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 5.174

Review 7.  Unique role of DDX41, a DEAD-box type RNA helicase, in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Satoru Shinriki; Hirotaka Matsui
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  Adult-onset hereditary myeloid malignancy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Takashi Toya; Hironori Harada; Yuka Harada; Noriko Doki
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.