Alieh Zendehdel Jadehkenari1, Hamid Reza Haghighatkhah2, Javad Sarrafzadeh1, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani1, Amir Massoud Arab3, Maryam Ziaeifar1. 1. Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Radiology Department of Diagnosis Imaging, Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine within-day intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm thickness and contractility (quantified by percentage thickness change) in supine position during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain. Methods: Seventeen volunteers (20-55 years of age) participated in this observational study. Bilateral diaphragm muscle thickness and contractility (percentage thickness change) were compared between 2 measurement sessions administered by a radiologist using B-mode real-time ultrasound (30 minutes apart). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [3, 3]) as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to determine the intra-rater reliability. Results: The right and left hemidiaphragm thickness showed good to excellent reliability at the end of deep inspiration (ICC, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.96; and ICC, 0. 93; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97, respectively) as well as at the end of deep expiration (ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-0.97; SEM, 0.19; MDC, 0.54; and CV, 7.84%, respectively) and the percentage thickness change (ICC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94; and ICC, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97, respectively). Conclusion: This study found that diagnostic ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm thickness and contractility in supine position during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain was reliable. The SEM, MDC, and CV reported may allow for accurate interpretation of diaphragm assessment in a clinical research setting.
Objective: This study aimed to determine within-day intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm thickness and contractility (quantified by percentage thickness change) in supine position during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain. Methods: Seventeen volunteers (20-55 years of age) participated in this observational study. Bilateral diaphragm muscle thickness and contractility (percentage thickness change) were compared between 2 measurement sessions administered by a radiologist using B-mode real-time ultrasound (30 minutes apart). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [3, 3]) as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to determine the intra-rater reliability. Results: The right and left hemidiaphragm thickness showed good to excellent reliability at the end of deep inspiration (ICC, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.96; and ICC, 0. 93; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97, respectively) as well as at the end of deep expiration (ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-0.97; SEM, 0.19; MDC, 0.54; and CV, 7.84%, respectively) and the percentage thickness change (ICC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94; and ICC, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97, respectively). Conclusion: This study found that diagnostic ultrasound measurements of the right and left hemidiaphragm thickness and contractility in supine position during deep breathing in individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain was reliable. The SEM, MDC, and CV reported may allow for accurate interpretation of diaphragm assessment in a clinical research setting.
Authors: Fatih Kantarci; Ismail Mihmanli; Mustafa Kemal Demirel; Kemal Harmanci; Canan Akman; Fatih Aydogan; Aydanur Mihmanli; Omer Uysal Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Ewan C Goligher; Franco Laghi; Michael E Detsky; Paulina Farias; Alistair Murray; Deborah Brace; Laurent J Brochard; Steffen-Sebastien Bolz; Steffen Sebastien-Bolz; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Brian P Kavanagh; Niall D Ferguson Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 17.440