| Literature DB >> 35773652 |
Parisa Sedaghati1, Somayeh Ahmadabadi2, Maryam Goudarzian3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the durability of the effects of corrective exercises on the postural alignment and stability of hyperkyphotic elderly with a history of falls. Balance disturbance and recurrent falls are directly related to changes in the alignment of physical posture and function of the elderly, and effective methods with durable effects on improving the postural stability of the elderly have always been under the attention of researchers.Entities:
Keywords: Balance; Elderly; Motor function; Posture
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35773652 PMCID: PMC9245289 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03210-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 4.070
Fig. 1CONSORT flowchart of the allocation of participants to the study groups
The descriptive characteristics of the Elderly in the Study Groups (n = 15)
| Variable | Experimental group (M ± SD) | Control group (M ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 66.00 ± 2.44 | 65.13 ± 2.74 | ||||
| Height (cm) | 167.5 ± 6.09 | 163.8 ± 5.28 | ||||
| Weight (kg) | 70.06 ± 5.65 | 67.66 ± 6.67 | ||||
| Body mass index (m2 / kg) | 24.96 ± 1.60 | 25.16 ± 1.16 | ||||
| MMSE | 26.07 ± 1.28 | 25.53 ± 0.99 | ||||
| FHD | 46.33 ± 4.38 | 47.33 ± 4.38 | 47.07 ± 4.66 | 47.00 ± 3.11 | 45.73 ± 3.21 | 46.20 ± 2.80 |
| 0.007* | 0.090 | |||||
| Kyphosis | 53.60 ± 2.77 | 52.13 ± 2.94 | 51.80 ± 3.05 | 52.93 ± 3.78 | 52.47 ± 3.75 | 52.20 ± 3.70 |
| 0.001* | 0.257 | |||||
| Functional balance | 14.40 ± 1.50 | 12.93 ± 3.12 | 13.53 ± 0.99 | 14.27 ± 1.38 | 14.07 ± 1.22 | 14.33 ± 1.17 |
| 0.002* | 0.681 | |||||
| Functional reach | 22.07 ± 2.28 | 24.93 ± 3.12 | 24.53 ± 2.74 | 21.80 ± 1.56 | 21.20 ± 2.07 | 20.73 ± 2.89 |
| 0.001* | 0.290 | |||||
| Rotate 180 degrees | 4.67 ± 0.90 | 3.87 ± 0.64 | 4.13 ± 0.51 | 4.33 ± 0.72 | 4.27 ± 0.59 | 4.40 ± 0.50 |
| 0.001* | 0.565 | |||||
| Fear of falling | 40.47 ± 3.09 | 37.53 ± 3.18 | 38.27 ± 3.73 | 39.60 ± 3.54 | 40.33 ± 3.59 | 40.07 ± 3.43 |
| 0.001* | 0.157 | |||||
* Significance at the level of P < 0.05
Pair-comparisons Between Various Study Phases Using the Bonferroni Post-hoc Test
| Variable | group | stage first–second | stage second-third | stage first-third |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHD | Experimental | 0.048* | 0.122 | 0.155 |
| Control | 0.199 | 0.451 | 0.743 | |
| Kyphosis | Experimental | 0.002* | 0.796 | 0.006* |
| Control | 0.750 | 1.000 | 0.625 | |
| Functional balance | Experimental | 0.025* | 0.171 | 0.040* |
| Control | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| Functional reach | Experimental | 0.005* | 0.026* | 0.010* |
| Control | 0.534 | 1.000 | 0.614 | |
| Rotate 180 degrees | Experimental | 0.016* | 0.122 | 0.044* |
| Control | 1.000 | 0.493 | 1.000 | |
| Fear of falling | Experimental | 0.001* | 0.155 | 0.001* |
| Control | 0.357 | 0.786 | 0.831 |
* Significance at the level of P < 0.05
Between-group Comparisons Based on Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (the Pre-test Phase as the Covariate)
| Variable | group | Type III Sum of Squares | Degrees of freedom | Average squares | F | Eta | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHD | Post-test | 34.878 | 1 | 34.878 | 9.824 | .005* | .309 |
| Follow up | 14.866 | 1 | 14.866 | 4.012 | .058 | .154 | |
| Kyphosis | Post-test | 7.008 | 1 | 7.008 | 3.278 | .084 | .130 |
| Follow up | 7.001 | 1 | 7.001 | 1.832 | .190 | .077 | |
| Functional balance | Post-test | 8.425 | 1 | 8.425 | 7.521 | .012* | .255 |
| Follow up | 5.920 | 1 | 5.920 | 6.378 | .019* | .225 | |
| Functional reach | Post-test | 71.575 | 1 | 71.575 | 13.719 | .001* | .384 |
| Follow up | 81.527 | 1 | 81.527 | 12.712 | .002* | .366 | |
| Rotate 180 degrees | Post-test | 1.785 | 1 | 1.785 | 5.164 | .033* | .190 |
| Follow up | 1.012 | 1 | 1.012 | 7.109 | .014* | .244 | |
| Fear of falling | Post-test | 92.163 | 1 | 92.163 | 42.352 | .001* | .658 |
| Follow up | 47.065 | 1 | 47.065 | 23.025 | .001* | .511 |
* Significance at the level of P < 0.05