Hyoung-Chun Nam1, Hyun-Gyu Cha1, Myoung-Kwon Kim2. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungbuk College, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to examine that therapeutic efficacy of an unstable surface on balance and gait ability in normal individuals. [Subjects and Methods] Forty subjects participated in the experiment and were randomly assigned to an experimental group of 20 subjects and a control group of 20 subjects. The experimental group performed balance exercise on an Aero-Step device (Aero-Step XL, TOGU, Prien-Bachham, Germany). The control group performed balance exercise on rigid ground. All subjects performed balance training 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks. After the intervention, balance measuring equipment (Good Balance, Metitur, Jyvaskyla, Finland) was used to quantitatively measure balance ability. [Results] Significant differences in post-training gains in the variables of static balance, dynamic balance, and velocity were observed between the experimental group and the control group. [Conclusion] Unstable surface training aimed at improving balance ability is considered to have a positive effect.
RCT Entities:
[Purpose] This study aimed to examine that therapeutic efficacy of an unstable surface on balance and gait ability in normal individuals. [Subjects and Methods] Forty subjects participated in the experiment and were randomly assigned to an experimental group of 20 subjects and a control group of 20 subjects. The experimental group performed balance exercise on an Aero-Step device (Aero-Step XL, TOGU, Prien-Bachham, Germany). The control group performed balance exercise on rigid ground. All subjects performed balance training 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks. After the intervention, balance measuring equipment (Good Balance, Metitur, Jyvaskyla, Finland) was used to quantitatively measure balance ability. [Results] Significant differences in post-training gains in the variables of static balance, dynamic balance, and velocity were observed between the experimental group and the control group. [Conclusion] Unstable surface training aimed at improving balance ability is considered to have a positive effect.
Balance is important for the entire population, from young adults to elderly individuals,
at risk for falls. For the elite athlete, balance deficits may affect performance1). The interaction of central and peripheral
elements is essential for maintaining balance. The peripheral element is comprised of the
somatosensory system, which provides information on the location of joints and the level of
tension, extension, and pain in joints, muscles, ligament, and the vestibular system, which
provides information on environmental changes2). The central element integrates information delivered from the
peripheral element and controls the location and posture of the trunk so that the are
correct. One of the important elements for functioning in daily life is maintenance of
symmetrical balance in the human body in standing or sitting postures. Therefore, the loss
of balance ability can cause secondary functional disorders due to falls1). Walking is one of the most common forms of
human movement, and the human body undergoes a complex process in neurologic and kinetic
terms until walking can be performed repeatedly and rhythmically. As this shows, because
various elements are involved in walking, an individual exhibits unique gait characteristics
according to his/her own functions in the muscular, skeletal, and nervous systems3). Gait is composed of cyclic crossing of the
stance leg by the swing leg during the single support phase, and in this phase, the trunk’s
dynamic balance ability is a highly important factor4). In recent years, balance training using the Aero-Step has been
introduced as one of the various interventions for improving balance and gait abilities. The
Aero-Step is characterized by elasticity and an unstable surface, as it contains chambers
filled with air. In addition, balance exercises using an Aero-Step reduce the impact on
lower extremity joints, and the Aero-Step enables performance of various exercises.
Moreover, it is a useful exercise tool that can reduce monotonousness and boredom in one’s
exercise routine5). Balance exercises using
an Aero-Step can not only activate the somatosensory, vestibular, and visual systems, which
are sensory systems involved in maintaining the body’s balance, but can also improve the
balance ability necessary for maintaining a standing posture. Although various studies have
been carried out regarding balance training, studies on balance training using the Aero-Step
are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of Aero-Step
balance training on the balance and gait abilities of normal individuals.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Forty subjects participated in the experiment and were randomly assigned to an experimental
group of 20 subjects and a control group of 20 subjects. The selection criteria for the
subjects that participated in the study were as follows: no history of orthopedic surgery in
the lower limb, no history of taking any drug due to neurologic problems, and no
musculoskeletal system disease. The Research Ethics Committee of Eulji University Hospital
approved the study, and all participants provided informed, written consent prior to
enrollment in the study. The average ages, heights, and weights were 20.17 ± 1.22 and 21.25
± 1.36 years old, 172.44 ± 12.03 and 173.15 ± 10.42 cm, and 68.05 ± 9.61 and 65.31 ± 6.62 kg
in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Sufficient explanation of this study’s
intent and the overall purpose was given, and voluntary consent to participation in this
study was obtained from all of the subjects. All procedures were reviewed and approved by
the Institutional Ethics Committee of Eulji University Hospital. The experimental group
performed balance exercise on the Aero-step device (Aero-step XL, TOGU, Prien-Bachham,
Germany)5). The control group was
performed balance exercise on the rigid ground. All subjects performed balance training 30
minutes a day, 5days a week, for 4weeks. The Aero-Step equipment was used to provide an
unstable base during the performance of the exercise program5). The Aero-Step equipment is 51 cm long, 37 cm wide, and 8 cm high.
It is composed of a soft rubber and contains two chambers, which are filled with air. In the
first phase exercise, the subjects bent the left knee joint at 90° while supporting the body
with the right leg, and then they bent the right knee joint at 90° while supporting the body
with the left leg. In the second phase, the subjects bent the left knee and hip joints at
90° while supporting the body with the right leg, and then they bent the right knee and hip
joints at 90° while supporting the body with the left leg. In the third phase, the subjects
walked in place on a supporting surface and maintained a certain gait velocity. While
walking in place, they bent the knee and hip joints. In the fourth phase, the subjects stood
upright with the feet shoulder-width apart and bent the knee and hip joints at 90°. In the
fifth phase, the subject bent and stretched the left hip joint while supporting the body
with the right leg, and then they bent and stretched the right hip joint while supporting
the body with the left leg. During this exercise, they were required to look straight ahead.
Each phase of exercise took five minutes. A three-minute break was provide between phases of
exercise. After the intervention, balance measuring equipment (Good Balance, Metitur,
Jyvaskyla, Finland) was used to quantitatively measure balance ability. For measurement of
balance functions, the subjects were instructed to stand on a triangle platform and maintain
a symmetric standing posture with the legs apart at shoulder width. In this case, a visual
fixed point was marked in front of the subjects to minimize head movement. The subjects were
then ask to place their arms comfortably at the sides of their hip joints, and the COP
(center of pressure) was measured for 30 seconds in this standing posture with the eyes
open. The COP was measured three times repeatedly, and the average value was calculated. A
pedometer (Gait Rite, K634-DB, Epson Inc, America) was used to collect data for
temporospatial gait characteristics such as velocity, step length, stride length, single
support duration, double support duration, and cadence of the experimental group and the
control group. For precise analysis of their gait, the subjects were asked to walk along a
2 m walkway in three sessions, and the average values of the data were used. The subjects
lifted their head and looked straight forward and walked barefoot while lightly swinging
their upper limbs6). Data analysis was
performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (IBM corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The mean and
standard deviation (SD) were calculated for each variable. Before the intervention,
differences in the general characteristics of the experimental and control groups were
compared using independent t-tests and χ2 tests. Comparisons of variables before
and after training within each group were made using paired sample t-tests. Comparisons of
pre- and post-test differences in variables between the experimental and control groups were
performed using the independent t-test. Intergroup effect sizes were calculated using the
Cohen d coefficient7). Statistical analysis
was performed at a 95% confidence level, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically
significant.
RESULTS
No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were observed between the two
groups (p>0.05). Forty subjects (experimental group=20, control group=20) completed this
experiment. The characteristics of the two groups before and after the intervention are
shown in Table 1. The experimental group showed significant increments in the variable of
static balance, dynamic balance and velocity compared with the pre-intervention results
(p<0.05). In addition, the control group showed significant improvement in static balance
and, dynamic balance compared with the pre-intervention results (p<0.05). Significant
differences in the post-training gains in the variable of static balance, dynamic balance,
and velocity were observed between the experimental group and the control group (p<0.05).
The effect sizes for gains in the experimental and control groups were very strong for
static balance, dynamic balance, and velocity (effect size=0.94, 1.16, and 0.83,
respectively).
Table 1.
Comparison of change in characteristics of the experimental group and control
group with values presented as the mean (standard deviation)
EG (n=20)
CG (n=20)
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
Balance
Static balance (score)a,b
68.5 (7.7)
83.2 (7.1)*
72.3 (7.3)
76.3 (5.3)*
Dynamic balance (score)a,b
70.5 (8.2)
78.6 (5.6)*
71.1 (5.0)
74.2 (4.1)*
Gait
Step length (cm)
56.2 (6.2)
59.2 (5.1)
53.2 (4.3)
55.2 (3.2)
Velocitya,b (m/s)
85.3 (5.2)
90.2 (3.2)*
77.1 (5.2)
80.2 (4.6)
Single support (%)
41.9 (6.3)
45.6 (7.2)
37.3 (5.2)
38.5 (6.7)
Cadence (steps/min)
98.2 (11.6)
102.8 (13.9)
88.3 (12.8)
90.1 (13.6)
EG: experimental group; CG: control group. aSignificant difference in
gains between two groups (p<0.05) bEffect size greater than 0.80
*Significant difference from pre-test (p<0.05)
EG: experimental group; CG: control group. aSignificant difference in
gains between two groups (p<0.05) bEffect size greater than 0.80
*Significant difference from pre-test (p<0.05)
DISCUSSION
Given that the advantage of balance exercises using an Aero-Step is that they can activate
not only sensory organs such as the somatosensory, vestibular, and visual systems, but also
the central nervous system, these exercises are also effective for brain fitness. In
addition, because the Aero-Step is safe and easy to handle, it can be used by the elderly
aged 60 or older8). This study was
performed to learn about the effects of balance exercises using an Aero-Step on the balance
and gait of normal individuals. As a result, statistically significant increases were
observed in dynamic and static balance abilities and gait velocity. A previous study
reported that when poststroke hemiplegicpatients performed somatosensory exercises using
the proprioceptive senses, statistically significant increases were shown in the balance
ability and functional gait indices9). This
is similar to the results of the present study. Another study reported that when strokepatients performed exercises on an unstable supporting surface, they showed improvements in
balance ability and reduction in the risk of falls compared with performing exercises on a
stable supporting surface10). The
mechanism of balance exercises using an Aero-Step can be explained as follows. Somatosensory
receptors are largely influenced by the surface. Therefore, balance exercises using
Aero-Step as an unstable surface activate tendons, ligaments, and joint receptors. This may
be because activation of the somatosensory system by the Aero-Step’s unstable surface has
positive impacts on improving balance and gait abilities. Reduced balance and gait abilities
cause falls. To prevent this, the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems should be
strengthened11). The organs that show
the largest distribution of somatosensory receptors in the human body are the hand, foot,
and face. Among them, the foot has the largest number of sensory receptors. Therefore,
balance exercises using an Aero-Step may be recommended as an exercise method that can
develop the somatosensory system effectively.
Authors: Leila Alizadehsaravi; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Wouter Muijres; Ruud A J Koster; Jaap H van Dieën Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 3.752