| Literature DB >> 35771771 |
Georges Potemberg1,2, Aurore Demars1, Emeline Barbieux1,2, Angéline Reboul1, François-Xavier Stubbe3, Malissia Galia1, Maxime Lagneaux1, Audrey Comein1, Olivier Denis4, David Pérez-Morga5, Jean-Marie Vanderwinden6, Xavier De Bolle1, Eric Muraille1,2.
Abstract
Brucellae are facultative intracellular Gram-negative coccobacilli that chronically infect various mammals and cause brucellosis. Human brucellosis is among the most common bacterial zoonoses and the vast majority of cases are attributed to B. melitensis. Using transposon sequencing (Tn-seq) analysis, we showed that among 3369 predicted genes of the B. melitensis genome, 861 are required for optimal growth in rich medium and 186 additional genes appeared necessary for survival of B. melitensis in RAW 264.7 macrophages in vitro. As the mucosal immune system represents the first defense against Brucella infection, we investigated the early phase of pulmonary infection in mice. In situ analysis at the single cell level indicates a succession of killing and growth phases, followed by heterogenous proliferation of B. melitensis in alveolar macrophages during the first 48 hours of infection. Tn-seq analysis identified 94 additional genes that are required for survival in the lung at 48 hours post infection. Among them, 42 genes are common to RAW 264.7 macrophages and the lung conditions, including the T4SS and purine synthesis genes. But 52 genes are not identified in RAW 264.7 macrophages, including genes implicated in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis, methionine transport, tryptophan synthesis as well as fatty acid and carbohydrate metabolism. Interestingly, genes implicated in LPS synthesis and β oxidation of fatty acids are no longer required in Interleukin (IL)-17RA-/- mice and asthmatic mice, respectively. This demonstrates that the immune status determines which genes are required for optimal survival and growth of B. melitensis in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35771771 PMCID: PMC9246152 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 7.464
Fig 1Comparison of B. melitensis multiplication in lungs of wild-type mice and RAW 264.7 macrophages.
A, B. C57BL/6 mice (n = 7–8) were infected with 5x106 CFU of mCherry-expressing B. melitensis and sacrificed at the indicated time. Lungs were harvested for CFU and fluorescent microscopy analysis. Data represent (A) the CFU count per g of lung from individual mice (n indicates the number of mice per group) and (B) the number of mCherry+ bacteria per cell determined by fluorescent microscopy (n indicates the number of infected cells observed per group). C, D. RAW 264.7 macrophages were infected with an MOI of 50 (50 bacteria per cell on average). Data shown are (C) the CFU count per condition and (D) the number of mCherry+ bacteria per infected cell (n indicates the number of infected cells observed per group). E. Data represent the comparison of the average number of mCherry+ bacteria per infected lung cell and per infected RAW 264.7 macrophage. Significant differences between the indicated groups are marked with asterisks: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, in a One-Way ANOVA with Kruskal-Wallis post-test. CFU results (A and C) are representative of three independent experiments. Microscopy bacteria count data for lung (B) are pooled from 2 independent in vivo experiment. For each experiment, the lungs of 3 mice were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Microscopy bacteria count data for RAW 264.7 (D) are pooled from 2 independent experiments.
Fig 4B. melitensis multiplies exponentially only in a fraction of alveolar macrophages.
C57BL/6 mice (n = 10) received intranasally PBS (uninfected mice) or 5x106 CFU of mCherry-expressing wild-type or ΔvirB strains of B. melitensis labelled with eFluor670. Mice were sacrificed at the indicated time. Lungs were collected and analyzed individually by flow cytometry for the expression of CD11c, Siglec-F, mCherry and eFluor670. Data shown are (A) representative dot plots of total lung cells from control and infected mice analyzed for the expression of CD11c and eFluor670, (B) representative dot plots of total lung cells and eFluor+ cells (R1 gate) analyzed for the expression of CD11c and Siglec-F, (C) representative dot plot of eFluor+ cells analyzed for the expression of CD11c and mCherry, (D) the kinetic percentage of mCherryhigh cells among eFluor+ lung cells per individual mice (n = 10). These results are representative of three independent experiments.