Literature DB >> 35768546

Clinico-biological markers for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults.

Aurélie Hanin1,2, Sophie Demeret3, Virginie Lambrecq1,2, Benjamin Rohaut1,3, Clémence Marois3,4, Meriem Bouguerra1,3, Alexandre Demoule5,6, Jean-Louis Beaudeux7,8, Randa Bittar9,10, Jérôme Alexandre Denis11, Françoise Imbert-Bismut9, Foudil Lamari9, Benoit Rucheton9, Dominique Bonnefont-Rousselot8,9,12, Mario Chavez1, Vincent Navarro13,14,15.   

Abstract

Prediction of mortality, functional outcome and recovery after status epilepticus (SE) is a challenge. Biological and clinical markers have been proposed to reflect the brain injury or to monitor critical ill patients' severity. The aim of this study was to characterize short-term and long-term prognostic factors for SE patients hospitalized in intensive care unit. Patient's outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at discharge and after 6-12 months. We first assessed the univariate prognosis significance of 51 clinical, demographic or biochemical markers. Next, we built multivariate clinico-biological models by combining most important factors. Statistical models' performances were compared to those of two previous published scales STESS and mSTESS. Eighty-one patients were enrolled. Thirty-five patients showed a steady state while 46 patients clinically worsened at discharge: 14 died, 14 had persistent disability at 6-12 months and 18 recovered. Logistic regression analysis revealed that clinical markers (SE refractoriness, SE duration, de novo SE) were significant independent predictors of worsening while lipids markers and progranulin better predicted mortality. The association of clinico-biological variables allowed to accurately predict worsening at discharge (AUC > 0.72), mortality at discharge (AUC 0.83) and recovery at long-term (AUC 0.89). Previous scales provided lower prediction for worsening (AUC 0.63, STESS; 0.53, mSTESS) and mortality (AUC 0.56, STESS; 0.62, mSTESS) (p < 0.001). We proposed new clinico-biological models with a strong discrimination power for prediction of short- and long-term outcome of hospitalized status epilepticus patients. Their implementation in electronic devices may enhance their clinical liability.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinico-biological scores; Prognosis; Recovery; Status epilepticus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35768546     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11199-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   6.682


  42 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of refractory status epilepticus in adults: A retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  Anne-Mari Kantanen; Matti Reinikainen; Ilkka Parviainen; Reetta Kälviäinen
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  A new clinical score for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults.

Authors:  M González-Cuevas; E Santamarina; M Toledo; M Quintana; J Sala; M Sueiras; L Guzman; J Salas-Puig
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 6.089

Review 3.  25 years of advances in the definition, classification and treatment of status epilepticus.

Authors:  Eugen Trinka; Reetta Kälviäinen
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Prognostic scores in status epilepticus-a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Fang Yuan; Qiong Gao; Wen Jiang
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.864

5.  A clinical score for prognosis of status epilepticus in adults.

Authors:  Andrea O Rossetti; Giancarlo Logroscino; Edward B Bromfield
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus (EMSE).

Authors:  M Leitinger; Y Höller; G Kalss; A Rohracher; H F Novak; J Höfler; J Dobesberger; G Kuchukhidze; E Trinka
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS): a tool to orient early treatment strategy.

Authors:  Andrea O Rossetti; Giancarlo Logroscino; Tracey A Milligan; Costas Michaelides; Christiane Ruffieux; Edward B Bromfield
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Prediction of functional outcome in patients with convulsive status epilepticus: the END-IT score.

Authors:  Qiong Gao; Tang-peng Ou-Yang; Xiao-long Sun; Feng Yang; Chen Wu; Tao Kang; Xiao-gang Kang; Wen Jiang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Epidemiology of status epilepticus in adults: A population-based study on incidence, causes, and outcomes.

Authors:  Markus Leitinger; Eugen Trinka; Giada Giovannini; Georg Zimmermann; Cristina Florea; Alexandra Rohracher; Gudrun Kalss; Caroline Neuray; Rudolf Kreidenhuber; Julia Höfler; Giorgi Kuchukhidze; Claudia Granbichler; Judith Dobesberger; Helmut F Novak; Georg Pilz; Stefano Meletti; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 10.  Markers in Status Epilepticus Prognosis.

Authors:  Ayham Alkhachroum; Caroline A Der-Nigoghossian; Clio Rubinos; Jan Claassen
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.590

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinico-biological markers for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults.

Authors:  Aurélie Hanin; Sophie Demeret; Virginie Lambrecq; Benjamin Rohaut; Clémence Marois; Meriem Bouguerra; Alexandre Demoule; Jean-Louis Beaudeux; Randa Bittar; Jérôme Alexandre Denis; Françoise Imbert-Bismut; Foudil Lamari; Benoit Rucheton; Dominique Bonnefont-Rousselot; Mario Chavez; Vincent Navarro
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.