| Literature DB >> 35768522 |
Mahsa Rezazadegan1, Farnaz Shahdadian1, Maryam Soheilipour2, Mohammad Javad Tarrahi3, Reza Amani4.
Abstract
Zinc is an important trace element for structure, and regulation in the central nervous system, as well as the gut homeostasis. There are several mental disorders associated with zinc deficiency. The relationship between zinc nutritional status with mood states and quality of life (QoL) in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) has not been studied yet. This case-control study aimed to investigate the association between zinc nutritional status with mood states and QoL in IBS-D patients. Sixty-one newly diagnosed patients with IBS-D and 61 matched healthy controls were enrolled. Dietary zinc intakes and serum zinc levels were measured. Mood states and QoL were evaluated by validated questionnaires. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of IBS-D in relation to zinc deficiency. Decreased serum zinc levels were observed in the IBS-D group than in the controls (p = 0.001). There were higher scores of depression (p = 0.014), anxiety (p = 0.005), and stress (p = 0.001) among IBS-D patients. Moreover, overall QoL, physical and psychological health were lower in IBS-D patients compared to the controls (p < 0.001). "Food avoidance" had the lowest, while the "relationship" had the highest score among the patients (51.09 ± 26.80 and 78.14 ± 23.30, respectively). Dietary zinc intake was positively correlated with psychological health in the controls (r = 0.295, p = 0.022) and with body image in the patients (r = 0.266, p = 0.044). According to the logistic regression, zinc deficiency was not significantly associated with odds of IBS-D. Findings show that zinc deficiency may be associated with some parameters of IBS-D. Further clinical studies are needed to explore the causal relationship between zinc status and IBS pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35768522 PMCID: PMC9243013 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15080-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
General characteristics of the study groups.
| Characteristics | IBS-D patients (n = 61) | Healthy controls (n = 61) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 37.01 ± 8.46 | 37.32 ± 9.02 | 0.845 |
| 0.99 | |||
| Female | 38 (62.3%) | 38 (62.3%) | |
| Male | 23 (37.7%) | 23 (37.7%) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.08 ± 3.44 | 25.48 ± 2.71 | 0.476 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 90.56 ± 9.63 | 91.31 ± 9.29 | 0.662 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 101.02 ± 6.77 | 101.76 ± 5.87 | 0.52 |
| 0.031* | |||
| Unemployed | 20 (32.8%) | 14 (23%) | |
| Self-employment | 14 (23%) | 6 (9.8%) | |
| Physician | 3 (4.9%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Employee | 17 (27.9%) | 32 (52.5%) | |
| Worker | 1 (1.6%) | 2 (3.3%) | |
| Student | 6 (9.8%) | 7 (11.5%) | |
| 0.043* | |||
| Lower than diploma | 16 (26.2%) | 8 (13.1%) | |
| Diploma | 9 (14.8%) | 19 (31.1%) | |
| University | 36 (59.0%) | 34 (55.7%) | |
| Serum zinc (µg/dL) | 76.12 ± 17.10 | 100.54 ± 49.68 | 0.001* |
| Subjects with zinc deficiency (< 70 µg/dL) | 26 (42.6%) | 18 (29.5%) | 0.131 |
| Dietary zinc intake (mg/day) | 8.54 ± 3.09 | 8.54 ± 2.93 | 0.998 |
| Energy intake (Kcal) | 2139.23 ± 710.68 | 2103.76 ± 642.97 | 0.777 |
| CHO1 intake (g) | 324.77 ± 112.49 | 318.53 ± 98.12 | 0.749 |
| Protein intake (g) | 76.34 ± 26.73 | 75.49 ± 23.90 | 0.855 |
| Fat intake (g) | 62.93 ± 27.58 | 62.16 ± 26.22 | 0.877 |
| Fiber intake (g) | 16.11 ± 8.20 | 17.52 ± 10.49 | 0.418 |
| Calcium intake (mg) | 718.84 ± 302.66 | 755.69 ± 328.97 | 0.528 |
| Iron intake (mg) | 23.28 ± 10.06 | 22.73 ± 10.29 | 0.772 |
| Copper intake (mg) | 1.30 ± 0.62 | 1.25 ± 0.51 | 0.641 |
| Magnesium intake (mg) | 245.98 ± 108.94 | 236.27 ± 81.50 | 0.584 |
1Carbohydrate.
Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or frequency (%).
Independent sample t-test was used for comparison of quantitative variables.
Chi-square test was used for comparison of qualitative variables.
*p-value < 0.05.
Mood states and quality of life score of the participants.
| Variables | IBS-D patients (n = 61) | Healthy controls (n = 61) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mood states | Depression | 12.32 ± 10.72 | 8.03 ± 8.11 | 0.014* |
| Anxiety | 10.98 ± 8.63 | 6.78 ± 7.55 | 0.005* | |
| Stress | 19.44 ± 10.46 | 13.50 ± 9.44 | 0.001* | |
| WHO Quality of Life | Overall QoL and general health | 53.48 ± 18.97 | 72.74 ± 12.81 | < 0.001* |
| Physical health | 59.59 ± 18.67 | 71.30 ± 13.95 | < 0.001* | |
| Psychological health | 55.80 ± 16.08 | 65.22 ± 12.35 | < 0.001* | |
| Social relationships | 61.19 ± 17.73 | 65.84 ± 14.24 | 0.113 | |
| Environmental health | 57.52 ± 14.01 | 59.52 ± 12.62 | 0.41 | |
| IBS Quality of Life | Total IBS-QoL | 59.18 ± 24.60 | – | – |
| Dysphoria | 60.42 ± 26.79 | – | – | |
| Interference with activity | 59.49 ± 26.88 | – | – | |
| Body image | 68.47 ± 25.80 | – | – | |
| Health worry | 53.55 ± 24.60 | – | – | |
| Food avoidance | 51.09 ± 26.80 | – | – | |
| Social reaction | 61.20 ± 24.57 | – | – | |
| Sexual worries | 66.48 ± 24.71 | – | – | |
| Relationship | 78.14 ± 23.30 | – | – | |
Data are presented as mean (standard deviation).
Independent sample t-test was used for comparison of quantitative variables.
*p-value < 0.05.
Correlation between dietary zinc intakes with depression, anxiety, stress and quality of life.
| Variables | IBS-D group (n = 58) | Control group (n = 60) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | ||
| Mood states | Depression | 0.055 | 0.684 | −0.169 | 0.196 |
| Anxiety | −0.031 | 0.816 | −0.138 | 0.291 | |
| Stress | 0.021 | 0.873 | −0.163 | 0.213 | |
| WHO Quality of Life | Overall QoL and general health | 0.089 | 0.504 | 0.204 | 0.118 |
| Physical health | 0.167 | 0.209 | 0.245 | 0.060 | |
| Psychological health | 0.039 | 0.771 | 0.295 | 0.022* | |
| Social relationships | −0.152 | 0.256 | 0.157 | 0.232 | |
| Environmental health | −0.003 | 0.983 | 0.144 | 0.273 | |
| IBS Quality of Life | Total IBS-QoL | 0.090 | 0.501 | – | – |
| Dysphoria | 0.136 | 0.310 | – | – | |
| Interference with activity | 0.006 | 0.962 | – | – | |
| Body image | 0.266 | 0.044* | – | – | |
| Health worry | 0.049 | 0.714 | – | – | |
| Food avoidance | 0.077 | 0.565 | – | – | |
| Social reaction | −0.040 | 0.763 | – | – | |
| Sexual worries | −0.045 | 0.736 | – | – | |
| Relationship | 0.019 | 0.890 | – | – | |
Data are presented as the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).
*p-value < 0.05.
Correlation between serum zinc levels with mood states and quality of life (QOL) scores.
| Variables | IBS-D group (n = 61) | Control group (n = 61) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | ||
| Mood states | Depression | −0.085 | 0.514 | −0.060 | 0.645 |
| Anxiety | 0.072 | 0.579 | −0.048 | 0.715 | |
| Stress | −0.163 | 0.211 | −0.038 | 0.772 | |
| WHO Quality of Life | Overall QoL and general health | −0.003 | 0.982 | −0.205 | 0.112 |
| Physical health | −0.135 | 0.301 | −0.015 | 0.908 | |
| Psychological health | −0.061 | 0.639 | −0.023 | 0.858 | |
| Social relationships | −0.056 | 0.668 | −0.034 | 0.793 | |
| Environmental health | −0.033 | 0.802 | −0.175 | 0.178 | |
| IBS Quality of Life | Total IBS-QoL | −0.027 | 0.839 | – | – |
| Dysphoria | −0.051 | 0.699 | – | – | |
| Interference with activity | −0.032 | 0.809 | – | – | |
| Body image | −0.025 | 0.847 | – | – | |
| Health worry | −0.122 | 0.351 | – | – | |
| Food avoidance | −0.002 | 0.989 | – | – | |
| Social reaction | 0.241 | 0.061 | – | – | |
| Sexual worries | −0.173 | 0.183 | – | – | |
| Relationship | 0.024 | 0.853 | – | – | |
Data are presented as the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).
Logistic regression for assessing the relationship between zinc deficiency and odds of IBS-D.
| Serum zinc levels (µg/dL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥ 70 | < 70 | |||
| OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Crude | 1 | – | 1.775 (0.840–3.751) | 0.133 |
| Model I1 | 1 | – | 2.41 (0.849–6.840) | 0.098 |
1Adjusted for employment, educational level, zinc intake, depression, anxiety, stress, overall QoL and general health, physical health and psychological health.