OBJECTIVE: There has been growing interest in the investigation of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. We recently reported on the development and preliminary validation of the IBS-QOL, a specific quality-of-life measure for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to determine the longitudinal construct validity (responsiveness) of the IBS-QOL. METHODS:Female patients enrolled in a multicenter treatment trial for functional bowel disorders were studied pre- and posttreatment with the IBS-QOL and other health status measures. Based on the response to treatment for several variables (pain/14-day score, daily function, and days in bed/3 months), patients were stratified into Responders, Partial Responders, and Nonresponders. Change scores in the IBS-QOL were then statistically compared with changes in the other variables to determine their correlation and whether Responders were significantly different from non- and Partial Responders on the IBS-QOL. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between change scores on the IBS-QOL and the other measures of treatment effect (Pain/14 days, r = 0.25, p < 0.002; Sickness Impact Profile [SIP] Total Score, r = 0.28, p < 0.0004). In addition, the IBS-QOL scores significantly differentiated Responders from Nonresponders for most of the variables tested (regression trend test for Pain/14 days, p < 0.04; SIP Total, p < 0.0001; SIP Physical, p < 0.0001; SIP Psychosocial, p < 0.002, and SIP Eating, p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The IBS-QOL is responsive to treatment in a referral-based clinical population of patients with functional bowel disorders.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: There has been growing interest in the investigation of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. We recently reported on the development and preliminary validation of the IBS-QOL, a specific quality-of-life measure for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to determine the longitudinal construct validity (responsiveness) of the IBS-QOL. METHODS: Female patients enrolled in a multicenter treatment trial for functional bowel disorders were studied pre- and posttreatment with the IBS-QOL and other health status measures. Based on the response to treatment for several variables (pain/14-day score, daily function, and days in bed/3 months), patients were stratified into Responders, Partial Responders, and Nonresponders. Change scores in the IBS-QOL were then statistically compared with changes in the other variables to determine their correlation and whether Responders were significantly different from non- and Partial Responders on the IBS-QOL. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between change scores on the IBS-QOL and the other measures of treatment effect (Pain/14 days, r = 0.25, p < 0.002; Sickness Impact Profile [SIP] Total Score, r = 0.28, p < 0.0004). In addition, the IBS-QOL scores significantly differentiated Responders from Nonresponders for most of the variables tested (regression trend test for Pain/14 days, p < 0.04; SIP Total, p < 0.0001; SIP Physical, p < 0.0001; SIP Psychosocial, p < 0.002, and SIP Eating, p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The IBS-QOL is responsive to treatment in a referral-based clinical population of patients with functional bowel disorders.
Authors: Yuri A Saito; Gloria M Petersen; Joseph J Larson; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Brooke L Fridley; Mariza de Andrade; G Richard Locke; Janice M Zimmerman; Ann E Almazar-Elder; Nicholas J Talley Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Puja Khanna; Nikhil Agarwal; Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Lin Chang; Roger Bolus; Gil Melmed; Cynthia B Whitman; Robert M Kaplan; Rikke Ogawa; Bradley Snyder; Brennan Mr Spiegel Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: S D Dorn; O S Palsson; M Woldeghebriel; B Fowler; R McCoy; M Weinberger; D A Drossman Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Maria C F Passos; Anthony J Lembo; Lisa A Conboy; Ted J Kaptchuk; John M Kelly; Mary T Quilty; Catherine E Kerr; Eric E Jacobson; Rong Hu; Elizabeth Friedlander; Douglas A Drossman Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Jeffrey M Lackner; Laurie Keefer; James Jaccard; Rebecca Firth; Darren Brenner; Jason Bratten; Laura J Dunlap; Changxing Ma; Mark Byroads Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 2.226