Literature DB >> 35766371

Differential motor system entrainment to auditory and visual rhythms.

Daniel C Comstock1,2, Ramesh Balasubramaniam2.   

Abstract

Perception of, and synchronization to, auditory rhythms is known to be more accurate than with flashing visual rhythms. The motor system is known to play a role in the processing of timing information for auditory rhythm perception, but it is unclear if the motor system plays the same role for visual rhythm perception. One demonstrated component of auditory rhythm perception is neural entrainment at the frequency of the auditory rhythm. In this study, we use EEG to measure the entrainment of both auditory and visual rhythms from the motor cortex while subjects either tapped in synchrony with or passively attended to the presented rhythms. To isolate activity from motor cortex, we used independent component analysis to first separate out neural sources, then selected components using a combination of component topography, dipole location, mu activation, and beta modulation. This process took advantage of the fact that tapping activity results in reduced mu power, and characteristic beta modulation, which helped select motor components. Our findings suggest neural entrainment in motor components was stronger for visual rhythms than auditory rhythms and strongest during the tapping conditions for both modalities. We also find mu power increased in response to both auditory and visual rhythms. These findings indicate that the generally greater rhythm perception capabilities of the auditory system over the visual system may not depend entirely on neural entrainment in the motor system, but rather how the motor system is able to use the timing information made available to it. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated neural entrainment in the motor system for both auditory and visual isochronous rhythms using electroencephalogram. Counter to expectations, our findings suggest stronger entrainment for visual rhythms than for auditory rhythms. Motor system activity was isolated with a novel procedure using independent component analysis as a means of blind source separation, along with known markers of mu activity from the motor system to identify motor components.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; entrainment; motor system; mu rhythms; rhythm cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35766371      PMCID: PMC9342137          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00432.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.974


  50 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Mu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual movements.

Authors:  D J McFarland; L A Miner; T M Vaughan; J R Wolpaw
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; Michael J Spivey; Carol L Krumhansl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Finding the beat: a neural perspective across humans and non-human primates.

Authors:  Hugo Merchant; Jessica Grahn; Laurel Trainor; Martin Rohrmeier; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain.

Authors:  Joyce L Chen; Virginia B Penhune; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives.

Authors:  François-Benoît Vialatte; Monique Maurice; Justin Dauwels; Andrzej Cichocki
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Tagging the musical beat: Neural entrainment or event-related potentials?

Authors:  Giacomo Novembre; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reply to Rajendran and Schnupp: Frequency tagging is sensitive to the temporal structure of signals.

Authors:  Tomas Lenc; Peter E Keller; Manuel Varlet; Sylvie Nozaradan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  EEG Frequency-Tagging and Input-Output Comparison in Rhythm Perception.

Authors:  Sylvie Nozaradan; Peter E Keller; Bruno Rossion; André Mouraux
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  The evolutionary neuroscience of musical beat perception: the Action Simulation for Auditory Prediction (ASAP) hypothesis.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel; John R Iversen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.