Literature DB >> 10791681

Mu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual movements.

D J McFarland1, L A Miner, T M Vaughan, J R Wolpaw.   

Abstract

People can learn to control the 8-12 Hz mu rhythm and/or the 18-25 Hz beta rhythm in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to control a cursor on a video screen. Subjects often report using motor imagery to control cursor movement, particularly early in training. We compared in untrained subjects the EEG topographies associated with actual hand movement to those associated with imagined hand movement. Sixty-four EEG channels were recorded while each of 33 adults moved left- or right-hand or imagined doing so. Frequency-specific differences between movement or imagery and rest, and between right- and left-hand movement or imagery, were evaluated by scalp topographies of voltage and r spectra, and principal component analysis. Both movement and imagery were associated with mu and beta rhythm desynchronization. The mu topographies showed bilateral foci of desynchronization over sensorimotor cortices, while the beta topographies showed peak desynchronization over the vertex. Both mu and beta rhythm left/right differences showed bilateral central foci that were stronger on the right side. The independence of mu and beta rhythms was demonstrated by differences for movement and imagery for the subjects as a group and by principal components analysis. The results indicated that the effects of imagery were not simply an attenuated version of the effects of movement. They supply evidence that motor imagery could play an important role in EEG-based communication, and suggest that mu and beta rhythms might provide independent control signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10791681     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023437823106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  156 in total

1.  Active training paradigm for motor imagery BCI.

Authors:  Junhua Li; Liqing Zhang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The possibility of determination of accuracy of performance just before the onset of a reaching task using movement-related cortical potentials.

Authors:  Satoshi Suzuki; Takemi Matsui; Yusuke Sakaguchi; Kazuhiro Ando; Nobuyuki Nishiuchi; Masayuki Ishihara
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback.

Authors:  Kai J Miller; Gerwin Schalk; Eberhard E Fetz; Marcel den Nijs; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Rajesh P N Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neural activity underlying motor-action preparation and cognitive narrowing in approach-motivated goal states.

Authors:  Philip A Gable; A Hunter Threadgill; David L Adams
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Somatosensory experiences with action modulate alpha and beta power during subsequent action observation.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Peter J Marshall; Cedric A Bouquet; Thomas F Shipley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Volitional control of neural activity: implications for brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Neurological rehabilitation of stroke patients by means of a robotically assisted brain controlled interface.

Authors:  Mohd Zaid Abdullah
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2009-04

8.  Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain-computer interface task.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Wander; Timothy Blakely; Kai J Miller; Kurt E Weaver; Lise A Johnson; Jared D Olson; Eberhard E Fetz; Rajesh P N Rao; Jeffrey G Ojemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The advantages of the surface Laplacian in brain-computer interface research.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI).

Authors:  Jürgen Mellinger; Gerwin Schalk; Christoph Braun; Hubert Preissl; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Niels Birbaumer; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.