Literature DB >> 20695698

Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization.

Michael J Hove1, Michael J Spivey, Carol L Krumhansl.   

Abstract

Prior research indicates that synchronized tapping performance is very poor with flashing visual stimuli compared with auditory stimuli. Three finger-tapping experiments compared flashing visual metronomes with visual metronomes containing a spatial component, either compatible, incompatible, or orthogonal to the tapping action. In Experiment 1, synchronization success rates increased dramatically for spatiotemporal sequences of both geometric and biological forms over flashing sequences. In Experiment 2, synchronization performance was best when target sequences and movements were directionally compatible (i.e., simultaneously down), followed by orthogonal stimuli, and was poorest for incompatible moving stimuli and flashing stimuli. In Experiment 3, synchronization performance was best with auditory sequences, followed by compatible moving stimuli, and was worst for flashing and fading stimuli. Results indicate that visuomotor synchronization improves dramatically with compatible spatial information. However, an auditory advantage in sensorimotor synchronization persists.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20695698     DOI: 10.1037/a0019059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  42 in total

1.  See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.

Authors:  Jessica A Grahn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; John R Iversen; Allen Zhang; Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-05-26

3.  The use of augmented auditory feedback to improve arm reaching in stroke: a case series.

Authors:  Joyce L Chen; Shinya Fujii; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Tapping ahead of time: its association with timing variability.

Authors:  Junkai Yang; Feiyi Ouyang; Linus Holm; Yingyu Huang; Lingyu Gan; Liang Zhou; Huizhen Chao; Mengye Wang; Mengxue He; Sheng Zhang; Bo Yang; Junhao Pan; Xiang Wu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-28

5.  Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.

Authors:  Breanna E Studenka; Daisha L Cummins; Kodey Myers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-01-25

6.  The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions.

Authors:  Lincoln J Colling; William F Thompson; John Sutton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Hearing the speed: visual motion biases the perception of auditory tempo.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Donatas Jonikaitis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Rhythmic entrainment: Why humans want to, fireflies can't help it, pet birds try, and sea lions have to be bribed.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson; Peter F Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

10.  Sensorimotor synchronization with audio-visual stimuli: limited multisensory integration.

Authors:  Alan Armstrong; Johann Issartel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.