Sabareeswaran Krishnan1,2, Shruthi Kanthaje1, Devasya Rekha Punchappady1, M Mujeeburahiman3, Chandrahas Koumar Ratnacaram4. 1. Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to Be University), University Road, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India. 2. Department of Urology, Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India. 3. Department of Urology, Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India. mujeeburahiman@gmail.com. 4. Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to Be University), University Road, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India. rckoumar@yenepoya.edu.in.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in Western and Asian countries. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test has been the routine diagnostic method despite the tremendous research in diagnostic markers for early detection of PCa. A shift towards a promising and potential biomarker for PCa detection is through metabolomic profiling of biofluids, particularly the blood and urine samples. Finding reliable, routinely usable circulating metabolite biomarkers may not be a distant reality. METHODS: We performed a PubMed-based literature search of metabolite biomarkers in blood and urine for the early detection of prostate cancer. The timeline of these searches was limited between 2007 and 2022 and the following keywords were used: 'metabolomics', 'liquid biopsy', 'circulating metabolites', 'serum metabolite', 'plasma metabolite', and 'urine metabolite' with respect to 'prostate cancer'. We focussed only on diagnosis-based studies with only the subject-relevant articles published in the English language and excluded all of the other irrelevant publications that included prostate tissue biomarkers and cell line biomarkers. RESULTS: We have consolidated all the blood and urine-based potential metabolite candidates in individual as well as panels, including lipid classes, fatty acids, amino acids, and volatile organic compounds which may become useful for PCa diagnosis. CONCLUSION: All these metabolome findings unveil the impact of different dimensions of PCa development, giving a promising strategy to diagnose the disease since suspected individuals can be subjected to repeated and largescale blood and urine testing.
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in Western and Asian countries. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test has been the routine diagnostic method despite the tremendous research in diagnostic markers for early detection of PCa. A shift towards a promising and potential biomarker for PCa detection is through metabolomic profiling of biofluids, particularly the blood and urine samples. Finding reliable, routinely usable circulating metabolite biomarkers may not be a distant reality. METHODS: We performed a PubMed-based literature search of metabolite biomarkers in blood and urine for the early detection of prostate cancer. The timeline of these searches was limited between 2007 and 2022 and the following keywords were used: 'metabolomics', 'liquid biopsy', 'circulating metabolites', 'serum metabolite', 'plasma metabolite', and 'urine metabolite' with respect to 'prostate cancer'. We focussed only on diagnosis-based studies with only the subject-relevant articles published in the English language and excluded all of the other irrelevant publications that included prostate tissue biomarkers and cell line biomarkers. RESULTS: We have consolidated all the blood and urine-based potential metabolite candidates in individual as well as panels, including lipid classes, fatty acids, amino acids, and volatile organic compounds which may become useful for PCa diagnosis. CONCLUSION: All these metabolome findings unveil the impact of different dimensions of PCa development, giving a promising strategy to diagnose the disease since suspected individuals can be subjected to repeated and largescale blood and urine testing.
Authors: Andrea Cerrato; Carmen Bedia; Anna Laura Capriotti; Chiara Cavaliere; Vincenzo Gentile; Martina Maggi; Carmela Maria Montone; Susy Piovesana; Alessandro Sciarra; Roma Tauler; Aldo Laganà Journal: Anal Chim Acta Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: W J Catalona; D S Smith; T L Ratliff; K M Dodds; D E Coplen; J J Yuan; J A Petros; G L Andriole Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-04-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Donna P Ankerst; Michael Liss; David Zapata; Josef Hoefler; Ian M Thompson; Robin J Leach Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Paweł Dereziński; Agnieszka Klupczynska; Wojciech Sawicki; Jerzy A Pałka; Zenon J Kokot Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 3.738