BACKGROUND/AIM: Several efforts have been made to find biomarkers that could help clinicians to preoperatively determine prostate cancer (PCa) pathological characteristics and choose the best therapeutic approach, avoiding over-treatment. On this effort, prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), prostate health index (phi) and sarcosine have been presented as promising tools. We evaluated the ability of these biomarkers to predict the pathologic PCa characteristics within a prospectively collected contemporary cohort of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localized PCa at a single high-volume Institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prognostic performance of PCA3, phi and sarcosine were evaluated in 78 patients undergoing RP for biopsy-proven PCa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses tested the accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)) in predicting PCa pathological characteristics. Decision curve analyses (DCA) were used to assess the clinical benefit of the three biomarkers. RESULTS: We found that PCA3, phi and sarcosine levels were significantly higher in patients with tumor volume (TV)≥0.5 ml, pathologic Gleason sum (GS)≥7 and pT3 disease (all p-values≤0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that phi is an accurate predictor of high-stage (AUC 0.85 [0.77-0.93]), high-grade (AUC 0.83 [0.73-0.93]) and high-volume disease (AUC 0.94 [0.88-0.99]). Sarcosine showed a comparable AUC (0.85 [0.76-0.94]) only for T3 stage prediction, whereas PCA3 score showed lower AUCs, ranging from 0.74 (for GS) to 0.86 (for TV). CONCLUSION: PCA3, phi and sarcosine are predictors of PCa characteristics at final pathology. Successful clinical translation of these findings would reduce the frequency of surveillance biopsies and may enhance acceptance of active surveillance (AS). Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: Several efforts have been made to find biomarkers that could help clinicians to preoperatively determine prostate cancer (PCa) pathological characteristics and choose the best therapeutic approach, avoiding over-treatment. On this effort, prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), prostate health index (phi) and sarcosine have been presented as promising tools. We evaluated the ability of these biomarkers to predict the pathologic PCa characteristics within a prospectively collected contemporary cohort of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localized PCa at a single high-volume Institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prognostic performance of PCA3, phi and sarcosine were evaluated in 78 patients undergoing RP for biopsy-proven PCa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses tested the accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)) in predicting PCa pathological characteristics. Decision curve analyses (DCA) were used to assess the clinical benefit of the three biomarkers. RESULTS: We found that PCA3, phi and sarcosine levels were significantly higher in patients with tumor volume (TV)≥0.5 ml, pathologic Gleason sum (GS)≥7 and pT3 disease (all p-values≤0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that phi is an accurate predictor of high-stage (AUC 0.85 [0.77-0.93]), high-grade (AUC 0.83 [0.73-0.93]) and high-volume disease (AUC 0.94 [0.88-0.99]). Sarcosine showed a comparable AUC (0.85 [0.76-0.94]) only for T3 stage prediction, whereas PCA3 score showed lower AUCs, ranging from 0.74 (for GS) to 0.86 (for TV). CONCLUSION:PCA3, phi and sarcosine are predictors of PCa characteristics at final pathology. Successful clinical translation of these findings would reduce the frequency of surveillance biopsies and may enhance acceptance of active surveillance (AS). Copyright
Authors: Stacy Loeb; Sanghyuk S Shin; Dennis L Broyles; John T Wei; Martin Sanda; George Klee; Alan W Partin; Lori Sokoll; Daniel W Chan; Chris H Bangma; Ron H N van Schaik; Kevin M Slawin; Leonard S Marks; William J Catalona Journal: BJU Int Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: John V Hegde; Darlene Veruttipong; Jonathan W Said; Robert E Reiter; Michael L Steinberg; Christopher R King; Amar U Kishan Journal: Urology Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Ottavio de Cobelli; Daniela Terracciano; Elena Tagliabue; Sara Raimondi; Danilo Bottero; Antonio Cioffi; Barbara Jereczek-Fossa; Giuseppe Petralia; Giovanni Cordima; Gilberto Laurino Almeida; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Carlo Buonerba; Deliu Victor Matei; Giuseppe Renne; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Matteo Ferro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giuseppe Lucarelli; Monica Rutigliano; Francesca Sanguedolce; Vanessa Galleggiante; Andrea Giglio; Simona Cagiano; Pantaleo Bufo; Eugenio Maiorano; Domenico Ribatti; Elena Ranieri; Margherita Gigante; Loreto Gesualdo; Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli; Carlo Buonerba; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Sabino De Placido; Silvano Palazzo; Carlo Bettocchi; Pasquale Ditonno; Michele Battaglia Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.817