Literature DB >> 15197191

Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson cancer center experience.

Allen M Chen1, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kelly K Hunt, Howard D Thames, Mary Jane Oswald, Elesyia D Outlaw, Eric A Strom, Marsha D McNeese, Henry M Kuerer, Merrick I Ross, S Eva Singletary, Fredrick C Ames, Barry W Feig, Aysegul A Sahin, George H Perkins, Naomi R Schechter, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Thomas A Buchholz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine patterns of local-regional recurrence (LRR) and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) among patients treated with breast conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 2000, 340 cases of breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Clinical stage at diagnosis (according to the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer system) was I in 4%, II in 58%, and III in 38% of patients. Only 4% had positive surgical margins.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up period of 60 months (range, 10 to 180 months), 29 patients had developed LRR, 16 of which were IBTRs. Five-year actuarial rates of IBTR-free and LRR-free survival were 95% and 91%, respectively. Variables that positively correlated with IBTR and LRR were clinical N2 or N3 disease, pathologic residual tumor larger than 2 cm, a multifocal pattern of residual disease, and lymphovascular space invasion in the specimen. The presence of any one of these factors was associated with 5-year actuarial IBTR-free and LRR-free survival rates of 87% to 91% and 77% to 84%, respectively. Initial T category (T1-2 v T3-4) correlated with LRR but did not correlate with IBTR (5-year IBTR-free rates of 96% v 92%, respectively, P =.19).
CONCLUSION: Breast conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in acceptably low rates of LRR and IBTR in appropriately selected patients, even those with T3 or T4 disease. Advanced nodal involvement at diagnosis, residual tumor larger than 2 cm, multifocal residual disease, and lymphovascular space invasion predict higher rates of LRR and IBTR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197191     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  89 in total

1.  Taxane-based chemotherapy enhances response to neoadjuvant treatment for stage II and III breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Andrade; H H A Carrara; F F Pimentel; H R C Marana; A H Macchetti; L R Mouro; F E Zola; D G Tiezzi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Phase II trial with letrozole to maximum response as primary systemic therapy in postmenopausal patients with ER/PgR[+] operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Ángel Guerrero; Antonio Galán; Vicente Carañana; Elvira Buch; Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure; Amparo Ruiz; Carlos Fuster Diana; Vicente Guillem Porta
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Surgical issues in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Placement of radiopaque clips for tumor localization in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  Julia L Oh; Giang Nguyen; Gary J Whitman; Kelly K Hunt; Tse-Kuan Yu; Wendy A Woodward; Welela Tereffe; Eric A Strom; George H Perkins; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Quantitative assessment Ki-67 score for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason R Brown; Michael P DiGiovanna; Brigid Killelea; Donald R Lannin; David L Rimm
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: use and trends in radiotherapy practice.

Authors:  T A Koulis; K Beecham; C Speers; S Tyldesley; D Voduc; C Simmons; R Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Fitzal; O Riedl; R Jakesz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Evaluation of surgical outcomes following oncoplastic breast surgery in early breast cancer and comparison with conventional breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chauhan; Mala Mathur Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-13

9.  The effects of adding zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumour response: exploratory evidence for direct anti-tumour activity in breast cancer.

Authors:  R E Coleman; M C Winter; D Cameron; R Bell; D Dodwell; M M Keane; M Gil; D Ritchie; J L Passos-Coelho; D Wheatley; R Burkinshaw; S J Marshall; H Thorpe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.