| Literature DB >> 35762634 |
Yue Chen1, Lan Chen1, Zhigang Xiao1, Lu Gao1.
Abstract
In this study, a coarse cereal compound powder (CCCP) was prepared through enzymolysis, fermentation, and joint treatment with 10 coarse cereal types as raw materials. Using 10 evaluation indices, namely the scavenging capacity of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•), 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS+ ), hydroxyl (OH•) and superoxide anion (O2 - ), the Fe2+ chelating capacity, the content of anthocyanin, flavone, soluble dietary fiber, reducing sugar and protein, antioxidant activity, and functional components of CCCP prepared by different methods were compared. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to establish a quality evaluation model of CCCP. Then, the effects of different treatments on the microstructure of CCCP were investigated. Two principal components (PCs) were extracted from PCA, with a cumulative contribution rate of 97.014%. In addition, the analysis of thermodynamic properties indicated that the initial gelatinization temperature of CCCP decreased after enzymolysis and fermentation and that it was easier to gelatinize. Particle size analyses revealed that different treatments could reduce the sample particles to different degrees. The average particle size in the three study groups decreased. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that after different treatments, the samples were destroyed to different extents, which facilitated easy dissolution of active substances. Fourier-transformed-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) revealed that the changes of CCCP functional groups after fermentation and joint treatment were more significant than those after enzymolysis. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: In this study, enzymolysis and fermentation techniques were used to improve the antioxidant activity and functional components of CCCP, and the effects of different treatments on the microstructure of CCCP were investigated. The bioavailability and nutrient composition of CCCP could be significantly improved by pretreatment, provide useful reference for the development of beneficial ingredients in cereal meal products and the application of different pretreatment methods.Entities:
Keywords: coarse cereal compound powder; enzymolysis; fermentation; microstructure; principal component analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35762634 PMCID: PMC9544778 DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci ISSN: 0022-1147 Impact factor: 3.693
FIGURE 1Effect of different treatment methods on the antioxidant activity of CCCP
Functional components of coarse cereal compound powder (CCCP) with different treatment methods
| Anthocyanin /(mg/100 g) | Flavone /(mg/100 g) | Soluble dietary fiber /% | Reducing sugar/% | Protein/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank group | 0.443±0.003b | 0.391±0.021c | 5.190±0.901d | 17.688±1.506b | 35.700±0.347a |
| Enzymolysis group | 0.496±0.013a | 0.444±0.011c | 9.828±1.242c | 33.497±0.848a | 32.210±0.342b |
| Fermentation group | 0.203±0.004c | 0.815±0.028b | 12.784±0.962b | 10.777±0.232c | 12.941±0.442d |
| Joint group | 0.214±0.004c | 1.202±0.044a | 14.877±0.912a | 11.487±0.291c | 13.741±0.162c |
Correlation of quality indices of CCCP with different treatment methods
| DPPH• scavenging capacity | ABTS+ scavenging capacity | OH• scavenging capacity | O2 – scavenging capacity | Fe2+ chelating capacity | Anthocyanin | Flavone | Soluble dietary fiber | Reducing sugar | Protein | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH• scavenging capacity | 1.000 | |||||||||
| ABTS+ scavenging capacity | 0.854 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| OH• scavenging capacity | 0.946 | 0.873 | 1.000 | |||||||
| O2 – scavenging capacity | 0.997 | 0.820 | 0.952 | 1.000 | ||||||
| Fe2+ chelating capacity | 0.944 | 0.857 | 0.999 | 0.952 | 1.000 | |||||
| Anthocyanin | −0.743 | −0.967 | −0.724 | −0.692 | −0.701 | 1.000 | ||||
| Flavone | 0.970 | 0.932 | 0.901 | 0.947 | 0.892 | −0.876 | 1.000 | |||
| Soluble dietary fiber | 0.915 | 0.920 | 0.990 | 0.912 | 0.985 | −0.790 | 0.899 | 1.000 | ||
| Reducing sugar | −0.473 | −0.725 | −0.337 | −0.402 | −0.309 | 0.870 | −0.670 | −0.406 | 1.000 | |
| Protein | −0.808 | −0.996 | −0.853 | −0.773 | −0.836 | 0.966 | −0.895 | −0.911 | 0.713 | 1.000 |
indicates extremely significant correlation (p < 0.01).
FIGURE 2PCA of CCCP with different treatment methods
The loading matrix of the two principal components (PCs) used in this study
| PC1 | PC2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Load | Eigenvector | Load | Eigenvector |
| DPPH• scavenging capacity | 0.950 | 0.326 | 0.207 | 0.187 |
| ABTS+ scavenging capacity | 0.973 | 0.334 | −0.188 | −0.170 |
| OH• scavenging capacity | 0.947 | 0.325 | 0.312 | 0.281 |
| O2 – scavenging capacity | 0.930 | 0.320 | 0.285 | 0.257 |
| Fe2+ chelating capacity | 0.937 | 0.322 | 0.342 | 0.308 |
| Anthocyanin | −0.898 | −0.309 | 0.430 | 0.388 |
| Flavone | 0.979 | 0.336 | −0.034 | −0.031 |
| Soluble dietary fiber | 0.961 | 0.330 | 0.209 | 0.188 |
| Reducing sugar | −0.622 | −0.214 | 0.763 | 0.688 |
| Protein | −0.952 | −0.327 | 0.211 | 0.190 |
| Eigenvalue | 8.471 | 1.230 | ||
| Explained variance/% | 84.711 | 12.304 | ||
FIGURE 3DSC gelatinization curves of CCCP
FIGURE 4Particle size distribution of CCCP for different treatment methods
FIGURE 5SEM images of different treatments. A is 1000 times of amplification in the blank group; a is 400 times amplification in the blank group; B is 1000 times amplification in the enzymolysis group; b is 400 times amplification in the enzymolysis group; C is 1000 times amplification in the fermentation group; c is 400 times amplification in the fermentation group; D is 1000 times amplification in the joint group; and d is 400 times amplification in the joint group
FIGURE 6Infrared spectrum analysis of CCCP with different treatment methods