Literature DB >> 35762353

Increased rate of pseudarthrosis in the anterior intersegmental gap after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps: a volumetric analysis.

Claudius Steffen1, Heilwig Fischer1,2,3, Marius Sauerbrey1, Thelma Heintzelmann1, Jan Oliver Voss1,3, Steffen Koerdt1, Sara Checa2, Kilian Kreutzer1, Max Heiland1, Carsten Rendenbach1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pseudarthrosis after mandibular reconstruction leads to chronic overload of the osteosynthesis and impedes dental rehabilitation. This study evaluates the impact of gap site on osseous union in mandible reconstruction using a new volumetric analysis method with repeated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
METHODS: The degree of bone regeneration was evaluated in 16 patients after mandible reconstruction with a fibula free flap and patient-specific reconstruction plates. Percentual bone volume and width changes in intersegmental gaps were retrospectively analyzed using a baseline CBCT in comparison to a follow-up CBCT. Patients' characteristics, plate-related complications, and gap sites (anterior/posterior) were analyzed. Detailed assessments of both gap sites (buccal/lingual/superior/inferior) were additionally performed.
RESULTS: Intersegmental gap width (p = 0.002) and site (p < 0.001) significantly influence bone volume change over two consecutive CBCTs. An initial larger gap width resulted in a lower bone volume change. In addition, anterior gaps showed significantly less bone volume changes. Initial gap width was larger at posterior segmental gaps (2.97 vs 1.65 mm, p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: A methodology framework has been developed that allows to quantify pseuarthrosis in reconstructed mandibles using CBCT imaging. The study identifies the anterior segmental gap as a further risk factor for pseudarthrosis in reconstructions with CAD/CAM reconstruction plates. Future research should evaluate whether this outcome is related to the biomechanics induced at this site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Fibula; Mandibular reconstruction; Pseudarthrosis; Surgical Flaps

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35762353      PMCID: PMC9522980          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20220131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   3.525


  29 in total

1.  Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model.

Authors:  Peter Augat; Johannes Burger; Sandra Schorlemmer; Thomas Henke; Manfred Peraus; Lutz Claes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Soft tissue coverage for mandibular fractures using two miniplates.

Authors:  Ajul Shah; Anup Patel; Derek Steinbacher
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-10-23

3.  Accuracy of CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction: A three-dimensional, fully virtual outcome evaluation method.

Authors:  Achille Tarsitano; Salvatore Battaglia; Francesco Ricotta; Barbara Bortolani; Laura Cercenelli; Emanuela Marcelli; Riccardo Cipriani; Claudio Marchetti
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Union and bone resorption of free fibular flaps in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Tuija M Yla-Kotola; Eric Bartlett; David P Goldstein; Kathleen Armstrong; Ralph W Gilbert; Stefan O P Hofer
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.873

5.  Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T.

Authors:  Carsten Rendenbach; Max Schoellchen; Julie Bueschel; Tobias Gauer; Jan Sedlacik; Daniel Kutzner; Pekka K Vallittu; Max Heiland; Ralf Smeets; Jens Fiehler; Susanne Siemonsen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: a comparison of MRI and CT in T- and N-staging.

Authors:  A Leslie; E Fyfe; P Guest; P Goddard; J E Kabala
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 7.  Outcomes of microvascular free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Migie Lee; Ronald Y Chin; Guy D Eslick; Niranjan Sritharan; Suchitra Paramaesvaran
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Classification of mandibular defects.

Authors:  J B Boyd; P J Gullane; L E Rotstein; D H Brown; J C Irish
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Free fibular flap with periosteal excess for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Emilio Trignano; Nefer Fallico; Mario Faenza; Corrado Rubino; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.425

10.  Removal of patient-specific reconstruction plates after mandible reconstruction with a fibula free flap: is the plate the problem?

Authors:  K Kreutzer; C Steffen; S Nahles; S Koerdt; M Heiland; C Rendenbach; B Beck-Broichsitter
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.789

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.