Literature DB >> 23616254

Union and bone resorption of free fibular flaps in mandibular reconstruction.

Tuija M Yla-Kotola1, Eric Bartlett, David P Goldstein, Kathleen Armstrong, Ralph W Gilbert, Stefan O P Hofer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate bony union and resorption after free fibular flap reconstruction for mandibular reconstruction.
METHODS: A total of 112 patients with composite resection and reconstruction with a fibular free flap were included. Computed tomography scan images taken after the reconstruction and approximately 1 year postoperatively were assessed to evaluate union (n = 60) and bone resorption (n = 24) of the neomandible.
RESULTS: Most of the fibulas healed well (n = 34) and there was radiologic nonunion in 20% of the neomandibles at the time of evaluation (mean = 15 months). There was a statistically significant reduction in bone height in the native mandible (p = 0.02) and the anterior part of the fibular graft (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant reduction in mandibular and fibular graft height. However, the bone resorption was clinically minimal. Sufficient maintenance of height and good bony union support the use of free fibular flap in mandibular reconstruction. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616254     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  7 in total

1.  Increased rate of pseudarthrosis in the anterior intersegmental gap after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps: a volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Claudius Steffen; Heilwig Fischer; Marius Sauerbrey; Thelma Heintzelmann; Jan Oliver Voss; Steffen Koerdt; Sara Checa; Kilian Kreutzer; Max Heiland; Carsten Rendenbach
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients.

Authors:  Michael Knitschke; Sophia Sonnabend; Fritz Christian Roller; Jörn Pons-Kühnemann; Daniel Schmermund; Sameh Attia; Philipp Streckbein; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Sebastian Böttger
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Biomechanical Analysis of Various Reconstructive Methods for the Mandibular Body and Ramus Defect Using a Free Vascularized Fibula Flap.

Authors:  Xian Li; Chao Jiang; Hui Gao; Chunjuan Wang; Chao Wang; Ping Ji
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Miniplates for Free Flap Fixation at the Mandible: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Kilian Kreutzer; Claudius Steffen; Steffen Koerdt; Christian Doll; Tobias Ebker; Susanne Nahles; Tabea Flügge; Max Heiland; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Carsten Rendenbach
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-14

5.  Long-term Growth, Functional, and Aesthetic Outcomes after Fibula Free Flap Reconstruction for Mandibulectomy Performed in Children.

Authors:  Farooq Shahzad; Peter W Henderson; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 6.  Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft.

Authors:  Qifeng Ou; Panfeng Wu; Zhengbing Zhou; Ding Pan; Ju-Yu Tang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Bone Union of Osseous Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer in Mandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Akina Tamaki; Shruthi Sethuraman; Lucy Shi; Songzhu Zhao; Keith C Carver; Angel Hatef; Michael Luttrull; Nolan B Seim; Stephen Y Kang; Enver Ozer; Amit Agrawal; Matthew O Old
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2022-01-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.