Literature DB >> 29802055

Accuracy of CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction: A three-dimensional, fully virtual outcome evaluation method.

Achille Tarsitano1, Salvatore Battaglia2, Francesco Ricotta2, Barbara Bortolani3, Laura Cercenelli3, Emanuela Marcelli3, Riccardo Cipriani4, Claudio Marchetti2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) methods for mandibular reconstruction have improved both functional and morphological results. We evaluated the accuracy of the CAD/CAM method for mandibular reconstruction and assessed the quantitative and qualitative reproducibility of virtual preoperative planning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 34 consecutive patients treated with mandibular reconstruction using the CAD/CAM method between January 2011 and October 2017 were included in this study. The accuracy of the reconstruction was assessed using the automated Hausdorff distance function of the simulation software, which set the postoperative mesh as the target. This made it possible to calculate the minimum error, the maximum error, and the mean error for each reconstruction in exactly the same way and with the same settings as the difference between the postoperative mesh and virtual planning. Finally, the coloured quality mapper function was applied to superimposition of the STL files, allowing us to visually render the obtained data on differences between preoperative planning and surgical outcome.
RESULTS: The average mean error obtained after performing an accuracy evaluation of our reconstructions was 1 mm (range 0.4-2.46 mm). Based on the colour map areas, the maximum error was located in the symphysis area. The body and ramus areas showed the greatest accuracy in terms of planning reproducibility.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the three-dimensional reproducibility of virtual planning using the CAD/CAM method for mandibular reconstruction, in a homogeneous sample of 34 cases. Our data suggest that CAD/CAM microvascular reconstruction can result in a very high degree of reproducibility. This occurs in complex areas as well as the condylar region and in the case of extensive mandibular reconstructions.
Copyright © 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD-CAM; Computer-assisted surgery; Free flap; Head and neck reconstruction; Mandibular reconstruction; Virtual surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29802055     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  13 in total

1.  Increased rate of pseudarthrosis in the anterior intersegmental gap after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps: a volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Claudius Steffen; Heilwig Fischer; Marius Sauerbrey; Thelma Heintzelmann; Jan Oliver Voss; Steffen Koerdt; Sara Checa; Kilian Kreutzer; Max Heiland; Carsten Rendenbach
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Factors influencing CAD/CAM accuracy in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ahmed Hassan Sweed; Alessandro Remigio Bolzoni; Aleksandra Kadubiec; Giada Anna Beltramini; Alessandro Cherchi; Alessandro Baj
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Clinical and volumetric outcomes after vertical ridge augmentation using computer-aided-design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized titanium meshes: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Alessandro Bianchi; Paolo Calamai; Lisa Rinaldi; Francesco Mangano; Elisabetta Vignudelli; Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed resin graft substitutes mimicking alveolar ridge augmentation: An in vitro pilot study.

Authors:  C C Stoop; K Chatzivasileiou; W E R Berkhout; D Wismeijer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Combined application of virtual surgery and 3D printing technology in postoperative reconstruction of head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Chao Li; Yongchong Cai; Wei Wang; Yan Sun; Guojun Li; Amy L Dimachkieh; Weidong Tian; Ronghao Sun
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  The Wearable VOSTARS System for Augmented Reality-Guided Surgery: Preclinical Phantom Evaluation for High-Precision Maxillofacial Tasks.

Authors:  Laura Cercenelli; Marina Carbone; Sara Condino; Fabrizio Cutolo; Emanuela Marcelli; Achille Tarsitano; Claudio Marchetti; Vincenzo Ferrari; Giovanni Badiali
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  A Marriage Between Plastic Surgery and Nano-Medicine: Future Directions for Restoration in Mandibular Reconstruction and Skin Defects.

Authors:  Ava Brozovich; Elizabeth Andrews; Ennio Tasciotti; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-03-27

8.  Full-Digital Workflow for Fabricating a Custom-Made Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Mandibular Implant: A Case Report.

Authors:  Francesco Grecchi; Piero Antonio Zecca; Aldo Macchi; Alessandro Mangano; Federica Riva; Emma Grecchi; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft.

Authors:  Qifeng Ou; Panfeng Wu; Zhengbing Zhou; Ding Pan; Ju-Yu Tang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Adherence to Computer-Assisted Surgical Planning in 136 Maxillofacial Reconstructions.

Authors:  Hongyang Ma; Sohaib Shujaat; Jeroen Van Dessel; Yi Sun; Michel Bila; Jan Vranckx; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.