| Literature DB >> 35761232 |
Chichen Zhang1, Zilong Zhang1, Jiakun Li1, Linghui Deng2,3, Jiwen Geng4, Kun Jin1, Xiaonan Zheng1, Shi Qiu5, BiRong Dong6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Klotho is a hormone that emerges as an antiaging biomarker. However, the influence of the dietary pattern's inflammatory potential on serum Klotho levels in human populations, especially in a general adult population, remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and serum Klotho concentrations in individuals living in the United States. METHODS : From the 2007-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database, data of participants who completed the full 24-h dietary history and underwent serum Klotho testing were analyzed. The association between DII and serum Klotho concentrations was estimated using multivariable linear regression models. We also conducted segmented regression model to examine the threshold effect of DII on serum Klotho concentrations.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker of aging; Dietary intake; Inflammation; Klotho; NHANES
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35761232 PMCID: PMC9238083 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03228-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 4.070
Characteristics of participants in the 2007–2016 NHANES
| Characteristic | Total | Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 10,928 | 2732 | 2732 | 2732 | 2732 | |
| DII (median, IQR) | 1.43 (-0.16–2.82) | -1.24 (-2.06–0.67) | 0.69 (0.28–1.08) | 2.13 (1.79–2.48) | 3.57 (3.17–4.08) | < 0.001 |
| Age (median, IQR), years | 56.00 (47.00–65.00) | 55.00 (47.00–63.00) | 55.00 (47.00–64.00) | 56.00 (47.00–65.00) | 57.00 (48.00–66.00) | < 0.001 |
| Klotho (median, IQR), pg/ml | 805.20 (657.58–1001.12) | 815.30 (666.98–1002.60) | 803.25 (655.65–1006.35) | 802.85 (654.15–984.85) | 799.20 (651.58–1009.03) | 0.245 |
| eGFR (median, IQR) mL/min/1.73m2 | 90.80 (76.29–102.37) | 91.85 (77.83–102.52) | 91.59 (77.53–102.67) | 90.04 (75.25–102.03) | 89.61 (74.72–102.42) | < 0.001 |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| male | 48.55% | 61.79% | 53.22% | 44.88% | 34.30% | |
| female | 51.45% | 38.21% | 46.78% | 55.12% | 65.70% | |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| Mexican American | 17.16% | 18.70% | 18.23% | 17.09% | 14.60% | |
| Other Hispanic | 12.20% | 11.27% | 11.79% | 12.81% | 12.92% | |
| Non-Hispanic White | 41.16% | 41.84% | 42.39% | 40.15% | 40.26% | |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 20.19% | 16.00% | 18.16% | 21.23% | 25.37% | |
| Other Race | 9.30% | 12.19% | 9.44% | 8.71% | 6.84% | |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| < 1.3 | 30.03% | 23.38% | 26.44% | 32.00% | 38.31% | |
| 1.3–3.5 | 35.98% | 31.79% | 35.96% | 37.51% | 38.67% | |
| > 3.5 | 33.99% | 44.83% | 37.59% | 30.49% | 23.01% | |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| normal (< 25 kg/m2) | 23.42% | 26.31% | 23.58%) | 21.73% | 22.07% | |
| overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) | 35.28% | 37.10% | 36.25%) | 35.14% | 32.62% | |
| obesity (> = 30 kg/m2) | 41.30% | 36.59% | 40.17%) | 43.13% | 45.31% | |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| less than moderate | 56.26% | 43.95% | 55.11% | 60.50% | 65.45% | |
| moderate | 8.77% | 9.50% | 8.79% | 8.87% | 7.91% | |
| vigorous | 34.98% | 46.55% | 36.09% | 30.63% | 26.65% | |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| Never | 52.68% | 54.51% | 53.11% | 51.59% | 51.50% | |
| Former | 31.05% | 34.10% | 32.50% | 30.72% | 26.89% | |
| Current | 16.27% | 11.39% | 14.39% | 17.69% | 21.61% | |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| none | 76.21% | 68.19% | 72.40% | 78.11% | 86.13% | |
| moderate | 8.06% | 10.98% | 9.00% | 6.55% | 5.71% | |
| heavy | 15.73% | 20.83% | 18.59% | 15.34% | 8.16% | |
| < 0.001 | ||||||
| No | 81.74% | 86.01% | 82.92% | 81.21% | 76.76% | |
| Yes | 18.26% | 13.99% | 17.08% | 18.79% | 23.24% |
Median (IQR) for continuous variables: P value for Mann–Whitney U test
% for Categorical variables: P value for chi-square test
DII quartile ranges: Quartile 1 = -5.18 to -0.16; Quartile 2 = -0.16 to 1.43; Quartile 3 = 1.43 to 2.82; Quartile 4: 2.82 to 5.42
DII Dietary Inflammatory Index, PIR Ratio of family income to poverty, BMI Body Mass Index
achronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) above 30 mg/g or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 mL/min/1.73 m.2
Association between Dietary Inflammatory Index and serum Klotho concentrations among adults in NHANES 2007–2016
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β(95%CI) | β(95%CI) | β(95%CI) | ||||
| Continuous | -1.59 (-4.40, 1.22) | 0.268 | -4.52 (-7.39, -1.65) | 0.002 | -4.39 (-7.49, -1.28) | 0.006 |
| Quartiles | ||||||
| Q1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Q2 | -9.39 (-24.58, 5.80) | 0.226 | -15.17 (-30.29, -0.04) | 0.049 | -9.75 (-25.53, 6.03) | 0.226 |
| Q3 | -22.53 (-38.14, -6.92) | 0.005 | -32.62 (-48.30, -16.95) | < 0.001 | -25.27 (-41.80, -8.73) | 0.003 |
| Q4 | 3.11 (-12.77, 19.00) | 0.701 | -12.41 (-28.59, 3.77) | 0.133 | -12.44 (-29.83, 4.95) | 0.161 |
| P for trend | 0.626 | 0.015 | 0.036 | |||
95%CI: 95% Confidence interval
Model 1: no adjust
Model 2: adjusted for age; sex; Race
Model 3: adjusted for age; sex; Race; Ratio of family income to poverty; BMI; alcohol intake; physical activity; smoking; eGFR
DII quartile ranges: Quartile 1 = -5.18 to -0.16; Quartile 2 = -0.16 to 1.43; Quartile 3 = 1.43 to 2.82; Quartile 4: 2.82 to 5.42
Threshold effect analysis for the relationship between Dietary Inflammatory Index and serum Klotho concentrations among adults in NHANES 2007–2016a
| Models | serum Klotho concentrations | |
|---|---|---|
| β(95%CI) | ||
| Model I | ||
| One line slope | -4.63 (-7.61, -1.65) | 0.002 |
| Model II | ||
| Turning point (K) | -1.82 (-2.32, -0.80) | |
| <—1.82 slope 1 | -33.05 (-52.84, -13.27) | 0.001 |
| >—1.82 slope 2 | -2.19 (-5.61, 1.24) | 0.211 |
| Slope 2 – Slope 1 | 30.87 (9.63, 52.11) | 0.004 |
| Predicted at 2.82 | 846.43 (834.62, 858.24) | |
| Log likelihood ratio test | 0.004b | |
Model I, linear analysis
Model II, non-linear analysis
Log likelihood ratio test: P-value < 0.05 means Model II is significantly different from Model I, which indicates a non-linear relationship
aadjusted for age; sex; Race; Ratio of family income to poverty; BMI; alcohol intake; physical activity; smoking; eGFR
bindicates that Model II is significantly different from Model I
Stratified analyses of association between Dietary Inflammatory Index and serum klotho concentrations (pg/ml) in NHANES 2007–2016a
| Variable | Dietary Inflammatory index group, β (95%CI), Quartiles | P for interaction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | P for trend | ||
| 0.003 | ||||||
| 40–56 | 0 | 19.12 (-0.48, 38.73) | -3.88 (-24.88, 17.12) | -0.02 (-22.28, 22.24) | 0.667 | |
| 56–80 | 0 | -30.10 (-49.18, -11.02) | -45.72 (-65.20, -26.24) | -32.21 (-52.61, -11.81) | < 0.001 | |
| 0.094 | ||||||
| Male | 0 | -1.89 (-18.68, 14.90) | -33.26 (-51.94, -14.59) | -34.18 (-55.38, -12.98) | < 0.001 | |
| Female | 0 | 0.27 (-22.11, 22.65) | -9.46 (-31.78, 12.87) | -0.13 (-22.56, 22.30) | 0.808 | |
| 0.015 | ||||||
| normal (< 25 kg/m2) | 0 | -25.79 (-53.91, 2.32) | -60.43 (-90.66, -30.21) | -49.89 (-81.59, -18.20) | < 0.001 | |
| overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) | 0 | -4.42 (-27.02, 18.18) | -18.79 (-42.72, 5.14) | -6.37 (-32.15, 19.41) | 0.346 | |
| obesity (> = 30 kg/m2) | 0 | 15.76 (-6.21, 37.73) | 1.03 (-21.50, 23.55) | 2.37 (-21.07, 25.81) | 0.901 | |
| 0.09 | ||||||
| Less than moderate | 0 | -13.04 (-32.90, 6.83) | -23.77 (-43.81, -3.72) | -23.83 (-44.40, -3.26) | 0.014 | |
| Moderate | 0 | -30.33 (-77.01, 16.34) | -64.32 (-115.35, -13.29) | 18.67 (-33.41, 70.75) | 0.901 | |
| Vigorous | 0 | 15.11 (-6.26, 36.48) | -12.36 (-35.75, 11.03) | -14.68 (-40.48, 11.12) | 0.187 | |
| 0 | 0.041 | |||||
| No | 0 | -0.74 (-15.61, 14.13) | -31.21 (-46.95, -15.47) | -16.99 (-33.78, -0.21) | 0.002 | |
| Yes | 0 | -29.05 (-65.83, 7.73) | 3.42 (-33.85, 40.68) | -12.34 (-49.27, 24.58) | 0.923 | |
95%CI: 95% Confidence interval
DII quartile ranges: Quartile 1 = -5.18 to -0.16; Quartile 2 = -0.16 to 1.43; Quartile 3 = 1.43 to 2.82; Quartile 4: 2.82 to 5.42
aadjusted for age; sex; Race; Ratio of family income to poverty; BMI; alcohol intake; physical activity; smoking status; eGFR. In each stratification, the model is not adjusted for itself
bchronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) above 30 mg/g or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 mL/min/1.73 m.2
cthe cutoff value was set by median