Literature DB >> 35755842

The Urobiomes of Adult Women With Various Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Status Differ: A Re-Analysis.

Cara Joyce1, Thomas Halverson2, Caroline Gonzalez2, Linda Brubaker3, Alan J Wolfe2.   

Abstract

The discovery of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has created opportunities for urinary health researchers who study a wide variety of human health conditions. This manuscript describes an analysis of catheterized urine samples obtained from 1,004 urobiome study participants with the goal of identifying the most abundant and/or prevalent (common) taxa in five clinically relevant cohorts: unaffected adult women (n=346, 34.6%), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (n=255, 25.5%), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (n=50, 5.0%), urinary tract infection (UTI) (n=304, 30.4%), and interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) (n=49, 4.9%). Urine was collected via transurethral catheter and assessed for microbes with the Expanded Quantitative Urine Culture (EQUC) technique. For this combined analytic cohort, the mean age was 59 ± 16; most were Caucasian (n=704, 70.2%), Black (n=137, 13.7%), or Hispanic (n=130, 13.0%), and the mean BMI was 30.4 ± 7.7. Whereas many control or IC/PBS cohort members were EQUC-negative (42.4% and 39.8%, respectively), members of the other 3 cohorts were extremely likely to have detectable microbes. The detected urobiomes of the controls and IC/PBS did not differ by alpha diversity or genus level composition and differed by only a few species. The other 3 cohorts differed significantly from the controls. As expected, Escherichia was both prevalent and highly abundant in the UTI cohort, but other taxa also were prevalent at more moderate abundances, including members of the genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Actinomyces, and Aerococcus. Members of these genera were also prevalent and highly abundant in members of the UUI cohort, especially Streptococcus anginosus. Intriguingly, these taxa were also detected in controls but at vastly lower levels of both prevalence and abundance, suggesting the possibility that UUI-associated symptoms could be the result of an overabundance of typical urobiome constituents. Finally, prevalence and abundance of microbes in the SUI cohort were intermediate to those of the UUI and control cohorts. These observations can inform the next decade of urobiome research, with the goal of clarifying the mechanisms of urobiome community composition and function. There is tremendous potential to improve diagnosis, evaluation and treatment for individuals affected with a wide variety of urinary tract disorders.
Copyright © 2022 Joyce, Halverson, Gonzalez, Brubaker and Wolfe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enhanced culture; lower urinary symptom; reanalysed data; urinary microbiome; women’s health

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35755842      PMCID: PMC9218574          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.860408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   6.073


Introduction

The discovery of the urinary microbiome has created opportunities for urinary health researchers in a wide variety of human health conditions. The first decade of urobiome studies have revealed clear associations between various microbes and various urinary symptoms and diagnoses. Several species have been associated with urgency urinary incontinence, including Actinotignum (previously Actinobaculum) schaalii, Streptococcus anginosus, and Aerococcus urinae (Pearce et al., 2014). Some evidence supports the hypothesis that A. urinae is also associated with urinary tract infection; since standard urine culture often misses A. urinae (Price et al., 2016), this and other evidence induces doubts concerning diagnoses of exclusion, such as UUI. Some women with lower urinary tract symptoms have urobiomes predominated by supposedly beneficial taxa, especially Lactobacillus species (Pearce et al., 2014; Pearce et al., 2015; Thomas-White et al., 2018). Finally, some evidence exists associating pre-treatment urobiome status with response to medical UUI treatment with an anticholinergic medication (Thomas-White et al., 2016) and response to surgical treatment with midurethral sling for mixed urinary incontinence (Richter et al., 2022). However, most early studies were small with sample sizes in the few dozens and were designed to only identify associations. As we begin the second decade of urobiome research, studies with increased samples sizes will be needed to verify and test these associations and their underlying mechanisms. To inform those efforts, this manuscript describes an analysis of catheterized urine samples obtained from 1,004 urobiome study participants (both unpublished and previously published). Our goal was to characterize the urobiome of women with lower urinary tract symptoms and identify the most abundant and/or prevalent (common) taxa in five clinically relevant cohorts. These cohorts were unaffected adult women, as well as those affected by common lower urinary tract conditions, including urinary tract infection (UTI), interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS), and two common forms of urinary incontinence: urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This descriptive analysis may inform future prospective work that incorporates knowledge of the urobiome composition in diagnosing and treating women presenting with symptoms.

Methods

Recruitment of Participants

The urobiome of 1004 participants previously reported in eight published studies were reanalyzed using five cohorts of clinical interest: UTI (n=304, 30.4%), UUI (n=255, 25.5%), SUI (n=50, 5.0%), IC/PBS (n=49, 4.9%), and controls (n=346, 34.6%) without these lower urinary tract symptoms. The inclusion criteria for each cohort were based on predominant presenting symptoms/diagnoses as assessed by the relevant validated questionnaire (see original publications). These participants were pooled from 8 separate, IRB-approved studies with identical baseline assessment and sample collection procedures. 921 of these participants were at least partially described previously ( ). These studies were supported by NIDDK (R01DK104718-01A1, R56DK104718-01, R21DK097435, and P20DK108268), a PFD Research Grant and a grant from the Falk Foundation (LU202567). The funders played no part in the design or conduct of the study.

Urine Collection and Analysis

Urine was collected aseptically via transurethral catheter, according to standard clinical protocols, and placed in a BD Vacutainer Plus C&S preservative tube. To detect microbes, Expanded Quantitative Urine Culture (EQUC) was used, as described (Hilt et al., 2014). Briefly, 0.1 mL of urine was spread quantitatively onto BAP, Chocolate and Colistin, Naladixic Acid (CNA) agars (BD BBL™ Prepared Plated Media), then incubated in 5% CO2 (35°C for 48 hours). A second set of BAPs were inoculated with 0.1 mL of urine and incubated in room atmosphere at 35°C and 30°C for 48 hours, respectively. In addition, 0.1 mL of urine was inoculated onto each of two CDC Anaerobe 5% sheep blood agar (ABAP) plates (BD BBL™ Prepared Plated Media) and incubated in either a Campy gas mixture (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N) or in anaerobic conditions at 35°C for 48 hours. The detection level was 10 CFU/mL, represented by 1 colony of growth on any of the plates. Each morphologically distinct colony type was isolated on a different plate of the same media to prepare a pure culture that was used for microbe identification. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 software (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) was used to identify the bacterial isolates.

Statistical Analysis

Generalized linear models were used to calculate age-adjusted estimates of microbial abundance, prevalence, and diversity for each cohort. Omnibus tests for cohort differences were assessed for each model, and group comparisons were reported as significant when Sidak-corrected p-values were less than 0.05. Alpha diversity measures included the unique number of genera (richness), Pielou’s index (evenness), the Shannon index (richness and evenness), and Simpson index (richness and abundance). Each alpha diversity measure was regressed on age and cohort in a separate general linear model with normal distribution and identity link. Alpha diversity measures were also correlated with age and body mass index, and Spearman’s rho with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each cohort. For each genus, abundance (mean CFU/mL) was modeled as a negative binomial distributed variable and regressed on cohort and age. Prior to modeling, mean CFU/mL for any taxon was calculated by dividing the total number of CFU/mL by the number of plates with growth for that taxon. The prevalence of each genus or species was defined as the proportion of individuals with any CFU/mL detected, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the adjusted mean prevalence for each cohort. The probability of no growth was modeled in a separate age-adjusted logistic regression analysis. SAS version 9.4 was used for statistical modeling, and microbiome diversity measure calculations and data visualization were performed using R version 4.0.3.

Results

The demographics of each study-specific cohort were described within the original studies. For this combined analytic cohort, the mean age was 59 ± 16, most were Caucasian (n=704, 70.2%), Black (n=137, 13.7%), or Hispanic (n=130, 13.0%), and mean BMI was 30.4 ± 7.7. The UTI and UUI cohorts were 10-15 years older on average than the other 3 cohorts. Participants in the control and IC/PBS cohorts were most likely to have no growth by EQUC: 42.4% and 39.8% of each cohort, respectively. In contrast, growth was not detected in only 5.6%, 7.9%, and 0.5% of the UTI, UUI and SUI cohorts, respectively ( ).
Table 1

Participant characteristics.

UTIUUISUIIC/PBSControl
N3042555049346
Age, mean (SD) [n=1001]66 (16)65 (12)54 (14)51 (16)50 (14)
Body mass index (kg/m²), mean (SD) [n=914]29.8 (7.2)31.8 (8.5)30.2 (6.9)--29.9 (7.5)
Race/ethnicity, n (%) [n=1003]
Non-Hispanic White224 (73.7)182 (71.4)36 (72.0)33 (67.3)229 (66.4)
Non-Hispanic Black34 (11.2)42 (16.5)3 (6.0)1 (2.0)57 (16.5)
Hispanic39 (12.8)23 (9.1)8 (16.0)13 (26.5)47 (13.6)
Other7 (2.3)8 (3.1)3 (6.0)2 (4.1)12 (3.5)
EQUC-negative (%)5.67.90.539.842.4
Participant characteristics. After adjusting for age, the detected urobiomes of the UTI and control cohorts differed in the number of genera (a measure of richness) and Simpson’s Index (which measures richness and abundance) but not Peilou’s evenness or Shannon’s Index (which measures both richness and evenness) ( ). The UUI and controls differed in number of genera, Shannon’s Index, and Peilou’s evenness, but not Simpson’s Index. The SUI and control cohorts differed in all 4 measures of alpha diversity, whereas the IC/PBS and control cohorts were similar. The UTI and UUI cohorts differed in all 4 measures, while the 2 incontinent cohorts (UUI and SUI) differed in the number of species and Shannon’s Index ( ). Correlations of age and body mass index with diversity indices were small to moderate across cohorts ( ). Older age was associated with higher diversity indices in the UUI and SUI cohorts and lower diversity indices for UTI. Higher BMI was associated with a greater number of genera detected across cohorts, and higher Shannon and Simpson indices in the UTI cohort.
Table 2

Age-adjusted diversity indices.

UTIUUISUIIC/PBSControl
Number of genera2.3 ± 0.1be 5.1 ± 0.1acde 2.3 ± 0.3be 1.6 ± 0.3b 1.3 ± 0.1abc
Pielou’s evenness*0.22 ± 0.02bc 0.51 ± 0.02ae 0.48 ± 0.05ae 0.35 ± 0.060.23 ± 0.02bc
Shannon index0.16 ± 0.03bc 0.77 ± 0.03acde 0.39 ± 0.06abe 0.33 ± 0.06b 0.19 ± 0.02bc
Simpson index0.17 ± 0.02bcde 0.47 ± 0.02a 0.34 ± 0.05ade 0.58 ± 0.05ac 0.54 ± 0.02ac

aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control. *calculated among those with at least two genera.

Age-adjusted diversity indices. aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control. *calculated among those with at least two genera. Of the detected genera, 20 were present in at least 2% of participants and investigated in models of prevalence by cohort ( and ). Escherichia was more prevalent in the UTI cohort (48.5%) than all others, but several other genera were detected in more than 10% of the UTI members, including Lactobacillus (39.7%), Streptococcus (27.8%), Staphylococcus (16.5%), Corynebacterium (14.9%), Gardnerella (13.2%), and Actinomyces (11.5%). More genera were commonly detected in the UUI cohort, with over 20% adjusted prevalence of each of the most prevalent genera in the UTI cohort plus Enterococcus. Among those with SUI, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus were the genera most often detected. Prevalence was generally lower in the IC/PBS and control cohorts across all genera, with Lactobacillus and Streptococcus the most common of those detected.
Figure 1

Age adjusted prevalence (%) with 95% confidence interval by cohort.

Table 3

Age adjusted prevalence (%) ± standard error.

UTIUUISUIIC/PBSControl
Lactobacillus39.7 + 3.0be 62.0 + 3.1acde 38.4 + 6.9b 23.4 + 5.9b 23.1 + 2.4ab
Streptococcus27.8 + 2.7b 66.5 + 3.0acde 40.7 + 7.0b 27.7 + 6.5b 25.8 + 2.5b
Escherichia48.5 + 3.0bcde 31.1 + 3.0ae 13.4 + 4.9a 9.8 + 4.4a 6.6 + 1.4ab
Staphylococcus16.5 + 2.2b 49.2 + 3.2ade 30.5 + 6.5e 19.2 + 5.7b 10.4 + 1.7bc
Corynebacterium14.9 + 2.1b 53.1 + 3.2acde 26.9 + 6.3be 15.5 + 5.3b 8.0 + 1.5bc
Actinomyces11.5 + 1.9b 39.2 + 3.2acde 13.6 + 5.0b 12.5 + 5.0b 8.3 + 1.6b
Aerococcus9.7 + 1.7b 33.7 + 3.1ae 18.0 + 5.712.8 + 5.26.1 + 1.4b
Gardnerella13.2 + 2.1b 23.6 + 2.8ade 10.1 + 3.91.9 + 1.6b 9.0 + 1.5b
Enterococcus7.9 + 1.6b 27.3 + 2.9ae 9.3 + 4.210.0 + 4.56.4 + 1.4b
Alloscardovia4.9 + 1.3b 15.4 + 2.4ae 9.1 + 4.15.3 + 3.33.2 + 1.0b
Klebsiella9.5 + 1.8e 6.8 + 1.61.0 + 1.53.4 + 2.81.9 + 0.8a
Actinotignum3.0 + 0.9b 13.0 + 2.2ae 7.4 + 3.81.1 + 1.61.9 + 0.8b
Facklamia1.0 + 0.5b 15.9 + 2.5ae 3.1 + 2.51.2 + 1.61.9 + 0.8b
Bifidobacterium4.4 + 1.2b 11.1 + 2.0ae 1.0 + 1.49.2 + 4.22.8 + 0.9b
Pseudoglutamicibacter1.9 + 0.8b 13.5 + 2.3ae 0.7 + 1.03.2 + 2.10.5 + 0.3b
Brevibacterium2.7 + 1.0b 12.2 + 2.2ae 2.8 + 2.32.7 + 2.20.4 + 0.3b
Micrococcus1.1 + 0.6b 8.6 + 1.8a 1.0 + 1.43.2 + 2.63.6 + 1.1
Candida2.4 + 0.9b 8.9 + 1.9ae 4.1 + 2.62.3 + 1.91.2 + 0.5b
Proteus4.0 + 1.25.6 + 1.5e 1.0 + 1.51.1 + 1.60.5 + 0.4b
Trueperella0.6 + 0.4b 5.6 + 1.6a 5.1 + 3.21.1 + 1.60.9 + 0.5
No growth5.6 + 1.4de 7.9 + 1.7de 10.5 + 4.3de 39.8 + 7.1abc 42.2 + 2.9abc

aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control.

Age adjusted prevalence (%) with 95% confidence interval by cohort. Age adjusted prevalence (%) ± standard error. aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control. Nine genera were both prevalent in at least 10% of participants across cohorts and exhibited significant cohort differences in abundance: Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Actinomyces, Aerococcus, Gardnerella, and Enterococcus (p<0.05 for all omnibus tests of cohort differences) ( and ). Corynebacterium, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Actinomyces and Gardnerella were significantly more abundant (generally 2 orders of magnitude) in participants with UUI than those in the non-UTI cohorts; these genera were more abundant in the UUI than the UTI cohort, except that the difference was generally 1 order of magnitude. Corynebacterium and Actinomyces were the notable exceptions, being 2 orders of magnitude more abundant in the UUI cohort than the UTI cohort. Aerococcus was significantly more abundant in the UUI cohort compared to the non-UTI cohorts. Escherichia was significantly more abundant in those with UTI compared to UUI, SUI, IC/PBS, and controls, but it was considerably more abundant in UUI and controls relative to SUI and IC/PBS. Staphylococcus was more abundant in the UTI and UUI cohorts compared to the other cohorts.
Figure 2

Age adjusted mean abundance (CFU/mL) with 95% confidence interval by cohort.

Table 4

Age adjusted mean (CFU/mL) ± standard error.

UTIUUISUIIC/PBSControl
Lactobacillus3703 + 999bcde 45774 + 13531acde 379 + 252ab 149 + 100 ab 580 + 148 ab
Streptococcus1458 + 396bce 25640 + 7671acde 118 + 79ab 217 + 145b 279 + 72ab
Escherichia158063 + 57687bcde 28559 + 12304acd 137 + 124abe 57 + 53abe 15871 + 5706acd
Staphylococcus2843 + 1299e 4513 + 1836ce 197 + 182b 1250 + 1271223 + 90ab
Corynebacterium388 + 141bc 32892 + 14307acde 25 + 22ab 317 + 279b 105 + 35b
Actinomyces32 + 12b 13587 + 5756acde 5 + 5b 32 + 30b 38 + 13b
Aerococcus2484 + 1682ce 6998 + 3595cde 8 + 8ab 90 + 93b 26 + 21ab
Gardnerella953 + 463bd 9251 + 5152acde 59 + 71b 2 + 2abe 378 + 176bd
Enterococcus1463 + 1162e 3367 + 2031ce 35 + 47b 228 + 32619 + 14ab

aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control.

Age adjusted mean abundance (CFU/mL) with 95% confidence interval by cohort. Age adjusted mean (CFU/mL) ± standard error. aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control. Of the nine prevalent genera with differential abundances, 6 included multiple species: Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Actinomyces, and Aerococcus ( ). Most species in these genera were differentially more prevalent in the UUI cohort than the controls: 4 of 5 Lactobacillus species, 2 of 6 Streptococcus species, 5 of 7 Staphylococcus species, 9 of 9 Corynebacterium species, 2 of 3 Actinomyces species, and both Aerococcus species. Streptococcus anginosus merits special mention; it was more prevalent in the UUI cohort relative to all the other cohorts, being detected in 49% of that cohort. Another noteworthy species was Staphylococcus epidermidis, which was more prevalent in the UUI, SUI and IC/PBS cohorts relative to the controls.
Table 5

Age adjusted prevalence (%) ± standard error.

UTIUUISUIIC/PBSControl
Lactobacillus
crispatus8.1 ± 1.615.1 ± 2.4e 10.3 ± 4.94.9 ± 2.75.7 ± 1.2b
gasseri14.5 ± 2.1b 29.6 ± 3.6ae 12.9 ± 4.811.2 ± 4.69.6 ± 1.7b
iners10.9 ± 1.9b 21.4 ± 2.8ae 15.3 ± 4.88.7 ± 3.46.8 ± 1.3b
jensenii9.6 ± 1.818.0 ± 2.5e 14.2 ± 4.73.7 ± 2.36.0 ± 1.2b
rhamnosus2.4 ± 3.93.2 ± 1.11.1 ± 1.51.2 ± 1.60.5 ± 3.4
Streptococcus
agalactiae8.7 ± 1.713.1 ± 2.2e 10.1 ± 4.29.8 ± 4.14.7 ± 1.1b
anginosus16.4 ± 2.2b 49.3 ± 3.2acde 26.4 ± 6.2be 10.9 ± 4.5b 11.4 ± 1.8bc
mitis3.7 ± 1.1b 9.9 ± 1.9a 7.0 ± 3.63.1 ± 2.54.6 ± 1.2
oralis2.3 ± 6.8bd 8.8 ± 1.8a 7.3 ± 3.812.3 ± 5.5a 4.8 ± 1.3
parasanguinis0.6 ± 5.4bc 4.8 ± 1.3a 7.4 ± 3.8a 5.8 ± 3.63.6 ± 1.1
salivarius0.7 ± 0.4b 5.4 ± 1.4a 5.3 ± 3.31.1 ± 1.63.9 ± 1.1
Staphylococcus
aureus2.0 ± 7.84.0 ± 1.39.2 ± 4.2e 1.1 ± 1.51.4 ± 1.7c
capitis1.2 ± 0.65.4 ± 1.53.0 ± 2.41.0 ± 1.41.3 ± 2.6
epidermidis7.4 ± 1.5b 36.8 ± 3.2ae 18.8 ± 5.6e 17.2 ± 5.5e 4.3 ± 1.1bcd
haemolyticus2.0 ± 2.8b 21.3 ± 2.8ae 5.1 ± 3.25.3 ± 3.31.0 ± 9.6b
hominis2.8 ± 1.8b 19.3 ± 2.6ae 2.9 ± 2.46.9 ± 3.61.5 ± 7.7b
lugdunensis2.1 ± 5.9b 8.4 ± 1.8ae 3.0 ± 2.47.2 ± 3.8e 0.4 ± 5.4bd
simulans1.6 ± 9.7b 10.2 ± 2.2ae 5.2 ± 3.23.3 ± 2.61.1 ± 1.6b
Corynebacterium
amycolatum4.3 ± 1.2b 31.0 ± 3.1acde 3.0 ± 2.4b 7.2 ± 3.8b 1.9 ± 6.8b
aurimucosum4.0 ± 1.2b 24.5 ± 2.9ae 10.4 ± 4.3e 4.7 ± 3.11.7 ± 7.7bc
coyleae5.1 ± 1.3b 29.9 ± 3.3ace 8.8 ± 4.6b 11.1 ± 4.52.7 ± 8.9b
Imitans2.9 ± 1.7b 12.1 ± 2.2ae 2.8 ± 2.34.7 ± 3.10.6 ± 8.4b
lipophile group1.5 ± 9.7b 11.3 ± 2.1ae 7.3 ± 3.8e 3.4 ± 2.70.4 ± 9.4bc
Riegelii0.7 ± 6.5b 11.7 ± 2.2ae 3.1 ± 2.53.3 ± 2.61.1 ± 2.6b
tuberculostearic1.1 ± 2.6b 7.0 ± 1.7ae 1.0 ± 1.45.4 ± 3.30.7 ± 9.5b
tuscaniense0.8 ± 6.5b 9.3 ± 2.9ae 1.0 ± 1.43.0 ± 2.50.4 ± 4.4b
urealyticum0.3 ± 6.3b 6.2 ± 1.7ae 1.1 ± 1.51.2 ± 1.60.5 ± 3.4b
Actinomyces
europaeus1.3 ± 9.6b 6.3 ± 1.6a 1.1 ± 1.53.5 ± 2.81.5 ± 6.7b
neuii6.2 ± 1.4b 23.4 ± 2.8ae 11.5 ± 4.75.6 ± 3.53.5 ± 1.1b
turicensis2.7 ± 6.9b 13.7 ± 2.3ae 3.1 ± 2.55.8 ± 3.63.3 ± 1.1b
Aerococcus
sanguinicola2.8 ± 0.9b 12.4 ± 2.2ae 9.5 ± 4.31.1 ± 1.60.1 ± 7.2b
urinae7.2 ± 1.4b 29.8 ± 3.1ae 15.7 ± 5.410.4 ± 4.84.4 ± 1.2b

aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control.

Age adjusted prevalence (%) ± standard error. aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control. Of all those species, only 9 were differentially abundant (Streptococcus anginosus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Aerococcus urinae, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Lactobacillus iners, Corynebacterium coyleae, Actinomyces neuii, Lactobacillus jensenii, and Corynebacterium amycolatum) ( ). Relative to the controls, 6 were more abundant in the UTI cohort, whereas all 9 were significantly more abundant in the UUI cohort. Again, S. anginosus merits notice; it was almost 10 and 100 times more abundant in the UTI and UUI cohorts, respectively. Whereas all 3 of the Lactobacillus species were more abundant in the UUI cohort, only L. gasseri was more abundant in the UTI cohort. A. urinae was more abundant in the UTI, UTI and IC/PBS cohorts, S. epidermidis was more abundant in the UTI and UUI cohorts, and A. neuii was more abundant in the UUI cohort. Whereas C. amycolatum was more abundant in the UTI, UUI, and IC/PBS cohorts, C. coyleae was more abundant in the UUI cohort but less abundant in the UTI cohort.
Table 6

Age adjusted mean (CFU/mL) ± standard error

UTIUUISUIIC/PBSControl
Streptococcus anginosus697 ± 258bce 10098 ± 3976acde 33 ± 29ab 131 ± 122b 84 ± 29ab
Lactobacillus gasseri1034 ± 480bce 7782 ± 3674acde 10 ± 11ab 97 ± 104b 28 ± 12ab
Lactobacillus iners384 ± 192bd 9655 ± 5150acde 155 ± 189b 8 ± 10ab 272 ± 125b
Lactobacillus jensenii1105 ± 66112724 ± 8098cde 23 ± 35b 18 ± 27b 224 ± 129b
Aerococcus urinae564 ± 253bce 4127 ± 1853acde 4 ± 4ab 66 ± 68be 1 ± 1abd
Staphylococcus epidermidis3489 ± 2488ce 4845 ± 2839cde 2 ± 3ab 51 ± 62b 20 ± 15ab
Actinomyces neuii10 ± 5b 8872 ± 5010acde 4 ± 6b 3 ± 4b 31 ± 15b
Corynebacterium amycolatum208 ± 118bce 12808 ± 8598acde 0 ± 0abd 30 ± 38bce 0 ± 0abd
Corynebacterium coyleae7 ± 4be 5802 ± 3385acde 1 ± 2be 104 ± 132b 176 ± 84abc

aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control.

Age adjusted mean (CFU/mL) ± standard error aDifferent from UTI; bdifferent from UUI; cdifferent from SUI; ddifferent from IC/PBS; edifferent from Control.

Discussion

Amongst these five cohorts of clinical interest, we detected group differences in urobiome characteristics. However, despite these group differences, the cohorts have between-group overlap that precludes accurate predictions of diagnostic categorization. In addition, within group variation suggests that a range of urobiome characteristics cannot be associated with a single diagnostic cohort. This is consistent with the evolving idea that many lower urinary tract symptoms have heterogenous etiologies and/or mechanisms. Nonetheless, the trends observed can be used to inform the second decade of urobiome research, with the goal of clarifying the mechanisms of urobiome community function and membership. We are hopeful that future, well-designed longitudinal research will contribute valuable insights. The etiology of painful bladder syndrome and interstitial cystitis continues to challenge clinicians and researchers who hope to find a way to ease the chronic suffering of affected patients. Although many hoped to find a single causative microbe, the “single microbe” hope has not been supported by research to date. Women with IC/PBS were just as likely to be EQUC-negative as healthy controls. Of those with detectable urobiomes, there was no difference in alpha diversity or composition at the genus level, and only a few differences in either prevalence or abundance but not both at the species level. Although there are clear and profound clinical differences between these two cohorts (Jacobs et al., 2021), these findings suggest that there is not likely to be a major microbial etiology. This analysis clearly demonstrates that, compared to the urobiomes of controls, richness was increased in the urobiome of the UUI, SUI and UTI cohorts, with the most richness found in the UUI cohort. While the UUI and SUI cohorts were richer, more even, and more abundant than the controls, the UUI cohort was richer than the SUI cohort and the UUI cohort was richer, more even and more abundant than the UTI cohort. Both forms of incontinence are chronic conditions, with likely longer term, chronic changes in the urobiome. Especially in women who are seeking treatment for incontinence, the effect of evaluation and treatment may also affect the urobiome that was sampled in these patients. In contrast, UTI is typically episodic. While there is little research into microbial recovery following UTI, it is expected that the urobiome attempts to return to the “normal” state, ideally closer to the urobiome seen in the control cohort. Within the UUI cohort, we detected multiple genera and species, many of which were prevalent and abundant. Many are of uncertain clinical significance and await further research to clarify the role of the individual microbe and its role in the function of the urobiome it inhabits. However, our findings that Aerococcus urinae is abundant in both UTI and UUI cohorts is not expected. Since A. urinae is often not detected on standard urine culture (Price et al., 2016), this finding supports the use of enhanced microbial detection methods in women with UUI, such as expanded culture techniques, to detect and appropriately treat this known uropathogen. Without appropriate detection, it is likely that symptomatic women would be deemed “infection free”; subsequent diagnosis and treatment would focus on a UUI diagnosis with the missed opportunity to treat a known uropathogen. A. urinae-associated UUI may be an important, treatable subset of UUI patients. This testable hypothesis should be addressed as a research priority as soon as feasible. We observed the expected disproportionate prevalence and abundance of Escherichia in the UTI cohort. Escherichia was less prevalent in the UUI and control cohorts but at relatively high abundance when detected. Other genera differed across cohorts. For example, while Lactobacillus is generally considered to be beneficial, it is likely that the beneficial contributions are determined at the species level and possible that certain Lactobacillus species (and other presumed beneficial microbes) can be opportunistic uropathogens within a given urobiome. For example, our finding that L. gasseri, L. iners, and other presumed commensal/beneficial genera often detected in controls are more abundant in the UUI cohort may suggest the possibility that the urobiome of these individuals could be affected by overgrowth of commensal/beneficial genera, a suggestion made more than 30 years ago by Rosalind Maskell and her team (Wilkins et al., 1989). Other detected species are thought to be emerging uropathogens and have been reported to be associated with UUI (e.g., S. anginosus and A. neuii [recently renamed Winkia neuii (Nouioui et al., 2018)]). This analysis benefits from multiple strengths, most notably the relatively large numbers once the five individual cohorts were pooled. Also, the urine samples were obtained by transurethral catheterization, increasing the likelihood that the urine is of bladder origin. Additionally, the use of EQUC ensures that living microbes are being assessed. Furthermore, all cohorts were characterized with well validated instruments for the specific lower urinary tract condition of interest. Finally, the results were adjusted for age, given the current evidence that age itself may affect microbial niches. Limitations include knowledge that EQUC does not detect every bacterial taxon and is especially limited for strict anaerobes. It also does not detect viruses or most eukaryotic microbes. Thus, the list of genera and species is likely incomplete. Also, given the design of the initial studies, this analysis cannot provide insights into longitudinal changes for individuals or across cohorts. Future prospective longitudinal studies should consider change in the urobiome composition as relates to diagnosis, symptom severity, treatment options, response, and recurrence. Finally, current clinical diagnostic categories were adopted prior to discovery of the urobiome; these categories may require revision as research closes important knowledge gaps. In conclusion, as we enter the second decade of urobiome research, there is tremendous potential to improve diagnosis, evaluation and treatment for individuals affected with a wide variety of urinary tract disorders. As the community of urobiome researchers expands, covering the entire urinary tract and exploring both benign and malignant disease, we expect that significant advances will rapidly occur. The next decade of research is also likely to benefit from less expensive microbiome technology, a larger pool of knowledgeable researchers who collaborate in multi-disciplinary teams, and an increased opportunity to acquire research funds.

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: This is a reanalysis. The data are present in the original papers. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to awolfe@luc.edu.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Loyola University Chicago IRB. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

CJ: Data Analysis, manuscript writing/editing. TH: Project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript review. CG: Data collection, manuscript review. LB: Project development, manuscript writing/editing. AW: Project development, manuscript writing/editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

These studies were supported by NIDDK (R01DK104718-01A1, R56DK104718-01, R21DK097435, and P20DK108268), a PFD Research Grant and a grant from the Falk Foundation (LU202567). The funders played no part in the design or conduct of the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  10 in total

1.  Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder.

Authors:  Evann E Hilt; Kathleen McKinley; Meghan M Pearce; Amy B Rosenfeld; Michael J Zilliox; Elizabeth R Mueller; Linda Brubaker; Xiaowu Gai; Alan J Wolfe; Paul C Schreckenberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Imen Nouioui; Lorena Carro; Marina García-López; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Rüdiger Pukall; Hans-Peter Klenk; Michael Goodfellow; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Urinary microbes and postoperative urinary tract infection risk in urogynecologic surgical patients.

Authors:  Krystal J Thomas-White; Xiang Gao; Huaiying Lin; Cynthia S Fok; Kathryn Ghanayem; Elizabeth R Mueller; Qunfeng Dong; Linda Brubaker; Alan J Wolfe
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Interstitial cystitis and the urethral syndrome: a possible answer.

Authors:  E G Wilkins; S R Payne; P J Pead; S T Moss; R M Maskell
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1989-07

5.  Incontinence medication response relates to the female urinary microbiota.

Authors:  Krystal J Thomas-White; Evann E Hilt; Cynthia Fok; Meghan M Pearce; Elizabeth R Mueller; Stephanie Kliethermes; Kristin Jacobs; Michael J Zilliox; Cynthia Brincat; Travis K Price; Gina Kuffel; Paul Schreckenberger; Xiaowu Gai; Linda Brubaker; Alan J Wolfe
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The Clinical Urine Culture: Enhanced Techniques Improve Detection of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms.

Authors:  Travis K Price; Tanaka Dune; Evann E Hilt; Krystal J Thomas-White; Stephanie Kliethermes; Cynthia Brincat; Linda Brubaker; Alan J Wolfe; Elizabeth R Mueller; Paul C Schreckenberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  The female urinary microbiome in urgency urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Meghan M Pearce; Michael J Zilliox; Amy B Rosenfeld; Krystal J Thomas-White; Holly E Richter; Charles W Nager; Anthony G Visco; Ingrid E Nygaard; Matthew D Barber; Joseph Schaffer; Pamela Moalli; Vivian W Sung; Ariana L Smith; Rebecca Rogers; Tracy L Nolen; Dennis Wallace; Susan F Meikle; Xiaowu Gai; Alan J Wolfe; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Association between the urogenital microbiome and surgical treatment response in women undergoing midurethral sling operation for mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Megan U Carnes; Yuko M Komesu; Emily S Lukacz; Lily Arya; Megan Bradley; Rebecca G Rogers; Vivian W Sung; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Benjamin Carper; Donna Mazloomdoost; Darryl Dinwiddie; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 10.693

9.  The female urinary microbiome: a comparison of women with and without urgency urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Meghan M Pearce; Evann E Hilt; Amy B Rosenfeld; Michael J Zilliox; Krystal Thomas-White; Cynthia Fok; Stephanie Kliethermes; Paul C Schreckenberger; Linda Brubaker; Xiaowu Gai; Alan J Wolfe
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Cultivable Bacteria in Urine of Women With Interstitial Cystitis: (Not) What We Expected.

Authors:  Kristin M Jacobs; Travis K Price; Krystal Thomas-White; Thomas Halverson; Abigail Davies; Deborah L Myers; Alan J Wolfe
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 1.913

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.