Meghan M Pearce1, Michael J Zilliox2, Amy B Rosenfeld3, Krystal J Thomas-White1, Holly E Richter4, Charles W Nager5, Anthony G Visco6, Ingrid E Nygaard7, Matthew D Barber8, Joseph Schaffer9, Pamela Moalli10, Vivian W Sung11, Ariana L Smith12, Rebecca Rogers13, Tracy L Nolen14, Dennis Wallace14, Susan F Meikle15, Xiaowu Gai2, Alan J Wolfe1, Linda Brubaker16. 1. Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL. 2. Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL. 3. Microbiology and Immunology Department, Hammer Health Sciences, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL. 5. Department of Reproductive Medicine, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 8. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI. 12. Department of Urology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 13. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM. 14. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. 15. Contraception and Reproductive Health Branch, Center for Population Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 16. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL. Electronic address: lbrubaker@luc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the urinary microbiota in women who are planning treatment for urgency urinary incontinence and to describe clinical associations with urinary symptoms, urinary tract infection, and treatment outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Catheterized urine samples were collected from multisite randomized trial participants who had no clinical evidence of urinary tract infection; 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing was used to dichotomize participants as either DNA sequence-positive or sequence-negative. Associations with demographics, urinary symptoms, urinary tract infection risk, and treatment outcomes were determined. In sequence-positive samples, microbiotas were characterized on the basis of their dominant microorganisms. RESULTS: More than one-half (51.1%; 93/182) of the participants' urine samples were sequence-positive. Sequence-positive participants were younger (55.8 vs 61.3 years old; P = .0007), had a higher body mass index (33.7 vs 30.1 kg/m(2); P = .0009), had a higher mean baseline daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes (5.7 vs 4.2 episodes; P < .0001), responded better to treatment (decrease in urgency urinary incontinence episodes, -4.4 vs -3.3; P = .0013), and were less likely to experience urinary tract infection (9% vs 27%; P = .0011). In sequence-positive samples, 8 major bacterial clusters were identified; 7 clusters were dominated not only by a single genus, most commonly Lactobacillus (45%) or Gardnerella (17%), but also by other taxa (25%). The remaining cluster had no dominant genus (13%). CONCLUSION: DNA sequencing confirmed urinary bacterial DNA in many women with urgency urinary incontinence who had no signs of infection. Sequence status was associated with baseline urgency urinary incontinence episodes, treatment response, and posttreatment urinary tract infection risk.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the urinary microbiota in women who are planning treatment for urgency urinary incontinence and to describe clinical associations with urinary symptoms, urinary tract infection, and treatment outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Catheterized urine samples were collected from multisite randomized trial participants who had no clinical evidence of urinary tract infection; 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing was used to dichotomize participants as either DNA sequence-positive or sequence-negative. Associations with demographics, urinary symptoms, urinary tract infection risk, and treatment outcomes were determined. In sequence-positive samples, microbiotas were characterized on the basis of their dominant microorganisms. RESULTS: More than one-half (51.1%; 93/182) of the participants' urine samples were sequence-positive. Sequence-positive participants were younger (55.8 vs 61.3 years old; P = .0007), had a higher body mass index (33.7 vs 30.1 kg/m(2); P = .0009), had a higher mean baseline daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes (5.7 vs 4.2 episodes; P < .0001), responded better to treatment (decrease in urgency urinary incontinence episodes, -4.4 vs -3.3; P = .0013), and were less likely to experience urinary tract infection (9% vs 27%; P = .0011). In sequence-positive samples, 8 major bacterial clusters were identified; 7 clusters were dominated not only by a single genus, most commonly Lactobacillus (45%) or Gardnerella (17%), but also by other taxa (25%). The remaining cluster had no dominant genus (13%). CONCLUSION: DNA sequencing confirmed urinary bacterial DNA in many women with urgency urinary incontinence who had no signs of infection. Sequence status was associated with baseline urgency urinary incontinence episodes, treatment response, and posttreatment urinary tract infection risk.
Authors: Alan J Wolfe; Evelyn Toh; Noriko Shibata; Ruichen Rong; Kimberly Kenton; MaryPat Fitzgerald; Elizabeth R Mueller; Paul Schreckenberger; Qunfeng Dong; David E Nelson; Linda Brubaker Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Anthony G Visco; Linda Brubaker; Holly E Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Marie Fidela Paraiso; Shawn A Menefee; Joseph Schaffer; John Wei; Toby Chai; Nancy Janz; Cathie Spino; Susan Meikle Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Anthony G Visco; Linda Brubaker; Holly E Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Shawn A Menefee; Joseph Schaffer; Jerry Lowder; Salil Khandwala; Larry Sirls; Cathie Spino; Tracy L Nolen; Dennis Wallace; Susan F Meikle Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David E Nelson; Qunfeng Dong; Barbara Van der Pol; Evelyn Toh; Baochang Fan; Barry P Katz; Deming Mi; Ruichen Rong; George M Weinstock; Erica Sodergren; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David Arndt; Jianguo Xia; Yifeng Liu; You Zhou; An Chi Guo; Joseph A Cruz; Igor Sinelnikov; Karen Budwill; Camilla L Nesbø; David S Wishart Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Rajvinder Khasriya; Sanchutha Sathiananthamoorthy; Salim Ismail; Michael Kelsey; Mike Wilson; Jennifer L Rohn; James Malone-Lee Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Derrick E Fouts; Rembert Pieper; Sebastian Szpakowski; Hans Pohl; Susan Knoblach; Moo-Jin Suh; Shih-Ting Huang; Inger Ljungberg; Bruce M Sprague; Sarah K Lucas; Manolito Torralba; Karen E Nelson; Suzanne L Groah Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Michael J Zilliox; William S Gange; Gina Kuffel; Carine R Mores; Cara Joyce; Paul de Bustros; Charles S Bouchard Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Elizabeth Southworth; Baylie Hochstedler; Travis K Price; Cara Joyce; Alan J Wolfe; Elizabeth R Mueller Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Yige Bao; Kait F Al; Ryan M Chanyi; Samantha Whiteside; Malcom Dewar; Hassan Razvi; Gregor Reid; Jeremy P Burton Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2017-01
Authors: Cynthia S Fok; Xiang Gao; Huaiying Lin; Krystal J Thomas-White; Elizabeth R Mueller; Alan J Wolfe; Qunfeng Dong; Linda Brubaker Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 2.894