| Literature DB >> 35754911 |
Mandy Ching Man Yau1, Martin Hayes2, Shafeer Kalathil1.
Abstract
This review discusses the progress in the assembly of photosynthetic biohybrid systems using enzymes and microbes as the biocatalysts which are capable of utilising light to reduce carbon dioxide to solar fuels. We begin by outlining natural photosynthesis, an inspired biomachinery to develop artificial photosystems, and the rationale and motivation to advance and introduce biological substrates to create more novel, and efficient, photosystems. The case studies of various approaches to the development of CO2-reducing microbial semi-artificial photosystems are also summarised, showcasing a variety of methods for hybrid microbial photosystems and their potential. Finally, approaches to investigate the relatively ambiguous electron transfer mechanisms in such photosystems are discussed through the presentation of spectroscopic techniques, eventually leading to what this will mean for the future of microbial hybrid photosystems. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35754911 PMCID: PMC9169074 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra00673a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Overview of the reactions within a natural photosynthetic system. Upon light absorption, electrons are excited twice by the photosystems to reduce nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+) to NADPH. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is also generated upon water oxidation and electron transport which resulted in a proton gradient which drive ATP synthesis. In the dark reaction, CO2 (and water) are combined with ribulose-1,5-biphosphate (RuBP) to yield 3-phosphoglycerate which is reduced to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate with ATP and NADPH.
Fig. 2Example artificial photosystems showing (a) a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF) composed of tetrahedrally-coordinated transition metals and imidazolate linkers. ZIFs showing high adsorption and complexation towards CO2 are combined with semiconductors with more appropriate bandgaps to generate electron–hole pairs for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. (b) a photoelectrochemical cell producing H2 from solar energy (c) a general nanoparticle-based semiconductor for photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CO (d) artificial leaf composed of a tandem construct to produce H2 from solar energy.
Fig. 3Example of a typical enzymatic photohybrid system in which CO2 is reduced by the enzyme to produce the appropriate biofuel.
Summary of advantages and disadvantages of different photosystems
| Type of photosystem | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Non-biological | High solar energy conversion efficiencies | Low product selectivity from CO2 reduction |
| Ease of design, tunability, and characterisation | Tends to produce CO only pH gradients result in transfer limitations and may subject the electrodes to corrosion | |
| Broad absorption bands | Internal resistance of the system may require an external bias to overcome | |
| Use of limited raw materials | ||
| Enzymatic | High rates and yields | Expensive to isolate and purify |
| High selectivity towards CO2-to-chemicals | Sensitive to a variety of environmental conditions ( | |
| Microbial | Utilises a myriad of enzyme cascades and metabolic pathways to synthesise complex products from simple feedstocks | Prioritises survival over efficiency |
| Resilient to environmental stress | Susceptible to electron losses due to slow kinetics between microbe and electrode | |
| Self-healing capabilities | ROS produced during photocatalysis may deactivate microbial activities | |
| Can be genetically engineered to increase conversion efficiencies, produce more complex chemicals, and improve product selectivity | ||
| Mild reaction conditions |
Example of hybrid photosystems
| System | Biological substance | Light absorber | Reaction | Production rates/yields/activity | Comments | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inorganic | — | Magnesium–aluminium–LDH/carbon nitride | CO2 to CH4 | 3.7 μmol in 24 hours | — |
|
| — | NaNbO3 nanowire | CO2 to CH4 | 653 ppm h−1 g−1 | — |
| |
| NaNbO3 bulk | 32 ppm h−1 g−1 | — | ||||
| — | Cobalt-ZIF-CdS | CO2 to CO + H2 | 124.4 μmol in 3 hours | TEOA = SED, bipyridine = e− transfer assistant, 82% CO selectivity |
| |
| — | Lanthanum/rhodium-doped strontium titanium( | CO2 to formate | 0.08% solar to formate conversion efficiency | 97% formate selectivity |
| |
| Enzymatic | Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase I | Anatase/rutile TiO2–RuP | CO2 to CO | 0.14 s−1 | 2-( |
|
| Formate dehydrogenase | tetrakis(4-methylpyridyl)porphyrin | CO2 to HCOOH | 62 μM in 3 hours | TEOA = SED |
| |
| MV2+ = e− mediator | ||||||
| Microbial |
| Silver indium sulfide/indium sulfide | H+ to H2 | 1660 μmol in 3 hours | Cysteine = SED |
|
|
| Gold nanocluster | CO2 to acetate | 6.01 mmol g−1 over 7 days | Cysteine = SED |
| |
|
| Silicon nanowires | CO2 to acetate | 0.3 g L−1 over 7 days | — |
| |
|
| Graphitic carbon nitride | Fructose to PHB | 6.73 g L−1 after 96 hours | TEOA = SED |
| |
|
| CdS nanorods | CO2 to PHB | 28 mg over 48 hours | 10% lactic acid = SED |
| |
| Graphitic carbon nitride catalyse | CO2 to PHB | 41.02 mg L−1 after 48 hours | — |
| ||
| Core–shell QDs | PHB | 100 mg g−1 d−1 |
|
| ||
| 2,3-Butanediol | 10 mg g−1 d−1 | |||||
| Ethylene | 1 mg g−1 d−1 | |||||
| Isopropanol | 2 mg g−1 d−1 | |||||
|
| Bi2O3 | H+ to H2 | ∼0.26 mL h−1 | MV2+ = e− mediator |
| |
| EDTA = SED | ||||||
|
| n+/p-Si/NiMo | CO2 to CH4 | 17.6 mL over 72 hours | H2 = e− donor |
| |
| CdS | CO2 to CH4 | 0.19 μmol h−1/13.70 μmol | Cysteine = SED |
|
Fig. 4Hybrid microbial photosystem designed by Xiao et al. consisting of a TiO2/CdS photoanode and a biocathode for CO2 reduction to CH4.[106] The sulfide electrolyte solution was used as sacrificial reagents to consume holes and prevent the corrosion of CdS.
Fig. 5General mechanism for electron transfer between a semiconductor and microbe in a hybrid photosystem. (a) Direct photoreduction of CO2 to acetic acid in which the semiconductor is deposited onto the surface of the microbe (b) indirect photoreduction of CO2 to H2 by colloidal nanoparticles in the presence of electron mediators and SEDs.
Fig. 6(a) Schematics of ATR. The infrared beam interacts with the biofilm sample at one point of reflection (or at multiple points with multi-bounce ATR). Some of the evanescent waves formed from total internal reflection interact with the sample, resulting in an attenuated total reflection. Reactions can be monitored in real-time and information about kinetics and key transient reaction intermediates can be obtained, aiding in the study of kinetics and mechanism of the system. (b) Experimental setup of photoluminescence spectroscopy. The laser is directed to the sample using optical lenses. Once the laser hits the sample, the electrons are excited to higher energy states and as they relax, radiation is emitted which is detected by the photoluminescence spectrometer at specific wavelengths which reflect the energy level differences. The decay kinetics of the photoluminescent curve obtain will give information about the processes taking place in the hybrid photosystem. (c) In transient absorption spectroscopy, a pump pulse is used to excite the sample containing microbes interfaced with nanoparticles. Changes in the optical absorption of the sample are measured as a function of time and thus, the sample's absorbance is measured before and after pumping. The resulting information regarding the system's decay and lifetimes will shed light onto the kinetics of the system.