Literature DB >> 35754591

Rarely mentioned: how we arrived at the quantitative definition of a rare disease.

Clyde Partin1.   

Abstract

Patients' difficulty obtaining medications for rare diseases and the advocacy of mothers led to a compelling and convoluted story of the development of the Orphan Drug Act (ODA) of 1983. While valid criticisms of the ODA remain, articles continue to be published on its ongoing beneficent influence. As hoped, ODA tax incentives stimulated research to develop pharmaceutical interventions for rare diseases. The initial ODA defined rare diseases qualitatively, but the 1984 Amendments established that <200,000 American citizens afflicted with a specific disease would be the numerical starting point. Considerable sleuthing was required to determine not only the source of this iconic number, but the reason this number was proposed. A coalition of Food and Drug Administration representatives, pharmaceutical executives, academic researchers, and members of rare disease advocacy organizations met in Washington, DC, and helped formulate the nuts and bolts of the ODA. As it turns out, two women at the conference brokered a deal in the restroom during a break and finalized this number. Paradoxically, rare diseases are not rare. Collectively, about 5000 to 7000 rare diseases are recognized and affect over 300,000 million people worldwide. Physicians should recognize that the collaboration of patient advocacy groups is an increasingly socially and politically effective force, bringing cohesion and recognition to associations such as the National Organization for Rare Disorders.
Copyright © 2022 Baylor University Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frank J. Sasinowski, MS, MPH, JD; Tourette’s Syndrome; prevalence

Year:  2022        PMID: 35754591      PMCID: PMC9196794          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2048613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  6 in total

1.  Reforming the Orphan Drug Act for the 21st Century.

Authors:  Ameet Sarpatwari; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Rare Diseases: Joining Mainstream Research and Treatment Based on Reliable Epidemiological Data.

Authors:  Stephen C Groft; Manuel Posada de la Paz
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  How did uncommon disorders become 'rare diseases'? History of a boundary object.

Authors:  Caroline Huyard
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2009-05

Review 4.  Rare Disease Terminology and Definitions-A Systematic Global Review: Report of the ISPOR Rare Disease Special Interest Group.

Authors:  Trevor Richter; Sandra Nestler-Parr; Robert Babela; Zeba M Khan; Theresa Tesoro; Elizabeth Molsen; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Using four decades of FDA orphan drug designations to describe trends in rare disease drug development: substantial growth seen in development of drugs for rare oncologic, neurologic, and pediatric-onset diseases.

Authors:  Kathleen L Miller; Lewis J Fermaglich; Janet Maynard
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy.

Authors:  Koichi Mikami
Journal:  Soc Hist Med       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 0.973

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.