Literature DB >> 19397760

How did uncommon disorders become 'rare diseases'? History of a boundary object.

Caroline Huyard1.   

Abstract

The category of 'rare diseases' has been in growing use in the fields of public health and patient advocacy for the past 15 years in Europe. In this socio-historical inquiry, I argue that this category, which appeared initially as a by-product of the orphan drug issue in the United States of America, is a boundary object. As such, it has different specific local uses: a meaningless category for physicians, it relates to the patients' experience of illness, whereas the pharmaceutical industry first considered it as being synonymous with small markets and then with innovation. Public bodies contributed to framing a common and blurred use, based on a statistical definition whose purpose was to foster co-operation between the four groups involved in the issue. In the definition process of the category of rare diseases, the key actors were the patients and public bodies, not medical professionals or the pharmaceutical industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397760     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01143.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  10 in total

1.  [Rare diseases: laying out some challenges].

Authors: 
Journal:  Cambios Rev Med       Date:  2017-01

2.  Rarely mentioned: how we arrived at the quantitative definition of a rare disease.

Authors:  Clyde Partin
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 3.  How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Yvonne Denier; Isabelle Huys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  The "technoscientization" of medicine and its limits: technoscientific identities, biosocialities, and rare disease patient organizations.

Authors:  Peter Wehling
Journal:  Poiesis Prax       Date:  2011-11-10

5.  Patient organization involvement and the challenge of securing access to treatments for rare diseases: report of a policy engagement workshop.

Authors:  Koichi Mikami; Steve Sturdy
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2017-09-04

6.  Inclusion and exclusion in the globalisation of genomics; the case of rare genetic disease in Brazil.

Authors:  Sahra Gibbon; Waleska Aureliano
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2018-04

7.  Key outcomes from stakeholder workshops at a symposium to inform the development of an Australian national plan for rare diseases.

Authors:  Caron Molster; Leanne Youngs; Emma Hammond; Hugh Dawkins
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.123

8.  From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): rethinking civil society engagement in technology assessment and development.

Authors:  Peter Wehling
Journal:  Poiesis Prax       Date:  2012-11-16

9.  Funding innovation for treatment for rare diseases: adopting a cost-based yardstick approach.

Authors:  Garret Kent Fellows; Aidan Hollis
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database.

Authors:  Stéphanie Nguengang Wakap; Deborah M Lambert; Annie Olry; Charlotte Rodwell; Charlotte Gueydan; Valérie Lanneau; Daniel Murphy; Yann Le Cam; Ana Rath
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.246

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.