Literature DB >> 3575426

Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment.

A H Franco.   

Abstract

The arch of the foot serves as an adaptable, supportive base for the entire body. This article discusses how the arch of the foot affects the normal biomechanics of the lower limb. An anatomical overview of the three components of the arch of the foot is presented, identifying the medial longitudinal arch as the arch mainly responsible for related structural problems throughout the lower limb. Deviations in the normal structure of the medial longitudinal arch produce unbalanced, functionally unstable conditions of the foot such as pes cavus or pes planus. Specific evaluation criteria for both pes cavus and pes planus are discussed, in addition to the adverse effects these two disorders have on weight bearing, force dissipation, and normal gait. Compensatory pronation associated with pes planus is one of the most common lower extremity disorders seen currently by physical therapists working in sports medicine, and its causes and related lower limb disorders are discussed. Most of these structural deformities can be corrected through the use of various orthotic devices. Specific guidelines are presented for using both soft and permanent orthoses, which offer the foot increased shock absorption and proper structural alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3575426     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/67.5.688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  37 in total

1.  Differences in sole arch indices in various sports.

Authors:  S T Aydog; O Tetik; H A Demirel; M N Doral
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Biomechanical risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries.

Authors:  F G Neely
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Effect of forefoot type on postural stability - a cross sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Guru Karthikeyan; Shamjibhai Jadav Jayraj; Venkatesan Narayanan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

4.  MIDFOOT AND FOREFOOT INVOLVEMENT IN LATERAL ANKLE SPRAINS AND CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITY. PART 1: ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS.

Authors:  John J Fraser; Mark A Feger; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

5.  Increased medial longitudinal arch mobility, lower extremity kinematics, and ground reaction forces in high-arched runners.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Robin N Tierney; Robert J Butler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of Pronated and Supinated Foot Postures on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability.

Authors:  Karen P Cote; Michael E Brunet; Bruce M Gansneder; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Arch height and maximum rearfoot eversion during jogging in 2 static neutral positions.

Authors:  Sae Yong Lee; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Foot structure and muscle reaction time to a simulated ankle sprain.

Authors:  Joanna R Denyer; Naomi L A Hewitt; Andrew C S Mitchell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Impact of various foot arches on dynamic balance and speed performance in collegiate short distance runners: A cross-sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Selvaraj Sudhakar; S Veena Kirthika; K Padmanabhan; G Mohan Kumar; C V Senthil Nathan; R Gopika; Asir John Samuel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02

10.  Foot Posture and Plantar Loading With Ankle Bracing.

Authors:  Laura C Dickerson; Robin M Queen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.